Cargando…

Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study

Inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) poses more challenge than inserting a single-lumen tube. The C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope is a useful alternative to the direct laryngoscope. However, no study has compared its performance with that of the McCoy laryngoscope, which has a hyperangul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Kyung Mi, Seo, Kwon Hui, Kim, You Jung, John, Hyunji, Moon, Hyun Soo, Kim, Namhyun, Yeon, Nayoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031775
_version_ 1784831440909762560
author Kim, Kyung Mi
Seo, Kwon Hui
Kim, You Jung
John, Hyunji
Moon, Hyun Soo
Kim, Namhyun
Yeon, Nayoung
author_facet Kim, Kyung Mi
Seo, Kwon Hui
Kim, You Jung
John, Hyunji
Moon, Hyun Soo
Kim, Namhyun
Yeon, Nayoung
author_sort Kim, Kyung Mi
collection PubMed
description Inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) poses more challenge than inserting a single-lumen tube. The C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope is a useful alternative to the direct laryngoscope. However, no study has compared its performance with that of the McCoy laryngoscope, which has a hyperangulated blade tip similar to that of the C-MAC D-blade. We aimed to compare the performance of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope with that of the McCoy laryngoscope in DLT intubation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 90 patients requiring DLT intubation were randomly allocated to either the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope group (group C, n = 47) or McCoy laryngoscope group (group M, n = 43). During intubation, the percentage of glottic opening, modified Cormack–Lehane grade, time taken for intubation, malposition of the bronchial lumen, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. After intubation, we assessed the intubation difficulty scale score and, a postoperative sore throat in the recovery room. RESULTS: The time taken for intubation was 35.85 ± 10.77 seconds and 33.18 ± 11.97 seconds in groups C and M, respectively (P = .269). The modified Cormack–Lehane grade was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .000). Percentage of glottic opening was significantly higher in group C (79.36 ± 13.42%) than in group M (53.49 ± 29.83%) (P = .000). The intubation difficulty scale score was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .030). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of malposition status, hemodynamic parameters, or visual analog scale score for a postoperative sore throat. CONCLUSION: Although the time taken for intubation was comparable between the 2 intubation devices, the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope facilitated glottis visualization and reduced the intubation difficulty scale better than the McCoy laryngoscope in patients undergoing DLT intubation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96661592022-11-16 Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study Kim, Kyung Mi Seo, Kwon Hui Kim, You Jung John, Hyunji Moon, Hyun Soo Kim, Namhyun Yeon, Nayoung Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 Inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) poses more challenge than inserting a single-lumen tube. The C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope is a useful alternative to the direct laryngoscope. However, no study has compared its performance with that of the McCoy laryngoscope, which has a hyperangulated blade tip similar to that of the C-MAC D-blade. We aimed to compare the performance of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope with that of the McCoy laryngoscope in DLT intubation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 90 patients requiring DLT intubation were randomly allocated to either the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope group (group C, n = 47) or McCoy laryngoscope group (group M, n = 43). During intubation, the percentage of glottic opening, modified Cormack–Lehane grade, time taken for intubation, malposition of the bronchial lumen, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. After intubation, we assessed the intubation difficulty scale score and, a postoperative sore throat in the recovery room. RESULTS: The time taken for intubation was 35.85 ± 10.77 seconds and 33.18 ± 11.97 seconds in groups C and M, respectively (P = .269). The modified Cormack–Lehane grade was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .000). Percentage of glottic opening was significantly higher in group C (79.36 ± 13.42%) than in group M (53.49 ± 29.83%) (P = .000). The intubation difficulty scale score was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .030). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of malposition status, hemodynamic parameters, or visual analog scale score for a postoperative sore throat. CONCLUSION: Although the time taken for intubation was comparable between the 2 intubation devices, the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope facilitated glottis visualization and reduced the intubation difficulty scale better than the McCoy laryngoscope in patients undergoing DLT intubation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9666159/ /pubmed/36397435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031775 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 3300
Kim, Kyung Mi
Seo, Kwon Hui
Kim, You Jung
John, Hyunji
Moon, Hyun Soo
Kim, Namhyun
Yeon, Nayoung
Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study
title Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_full Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_short Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_sort comparison of the c-mac d-blade video laryngoscope and the mccoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: a prospective randomized controlled study
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031775
work_keys_str_mv AT kimkyungmi comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT seokwonhui comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimyoujung comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT johnhyunji comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT moonhyunsoo comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimnamhyun comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yeonnayoung comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy