Cargando…
Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study
Inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) poses more challenge than inserting a single-lumen tube. The C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope is a useful alternative to the direct laryngoscope. However, no study has compared its performance with that of the McCoy laryngoscope, which has a hyperangul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031775 |
_version_ | 1784831440909762560 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Kyung Mi Seo, Kwon Hui Kim, You Jung John, Hyunji Moon, Hyun Soo Kim, Namhyun Yeon, Nayoung |
author_facet | Kim, Kyung Mi Seo, Kwon Hui Kim, You Jung John, Hyunji Moon, Hyun Soo Kim, Namhyun Yeon, Nayoung |
author_sort | Kim, Kyung Mi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) poses more challenge than inserting a single-lumen tube. The C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope is a useful alternative to the direct laryngoscope. However, no study has compared its performance with that of the McCoy laryngoscope, which has a hyperangulated blade tip similar to that of the C-MAC D-blade. We aimed to compare the performance of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope with that of the McCoy laryngoscope in DLT intubation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 90 patients requiring DLT intubation were randomly allocated to either the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope group (group C, n = 47) or McCoy laryngoscope group (group M, n = 43). During intubation, the percentage of glottic opening, modified Cormack–Lehane grade, time taken for intubation, malposition of the bronchial lumen, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. After intubation, we assessed the intubation difficulty scale score and, a postoperative sore throat in the recovery room. RESULTS: The time taken for intubation was 35.85 ± 10.77 seconds and 33.18 ± 11.97 seconds in groups C and M, respectively (P = .269). The modified Cormack–Lehane grade was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .000). Percentage of glottic opening was significantly higher in group C (79.36 ± 13.42%) than in group M (53.49 ± 29.83%) (P = .000). The intubation difficulty scale score was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .030). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of malposition status, hemodynamic parameters, or visual analog scale score for a postoperative sore throat. CONCLUSION: Although the time taken for intubation was comparable between the 2 intubation devices, the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope facilitated glottis visualization and reduced the intubation difficulty scale better than the McCoy laryngoscope in patients undergoing DLT intubation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9666159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96661592022-11-16 Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study Kim, Kyung Mi Seo, Kwon Hui Kim, You Jung John, Hyunji Moon, Hyun Soo Kim, Namhyun Yeon, Nayoung Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 Inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) poses more challenge than inserting a single-lumen tube. The C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope is a useful alternative to the direct laryngoscope. However, no study has compared its performance with that of the McCoy laryngoscope, which has a hyperangulated blade tip similar to that of the C-MAC D-blade. We aimed to compare the performance of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope with that of the McCoy laryngoscope in DLT intubation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 90 patients requiring DLT intubation were randomly allocated to either the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope group (group C, n = 47) or McCoy laryngoscope group (group M, n = 43). During intubation, the percentage of glottic opening, modified Cormack–Lehane grade, time taken for intubation, malposition of the bronchial lumen, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. After intubation, we assessed the intubation difficulty scale score and, a postoperative sore throat in the recovery room. RESULTS: The time taken for intubation was 35.85 ± 10.77 seconds and 33.18 ± 11.97 seconds in groups C and M, respectively (P = .269). The modified Cormack–Lehane grade was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .000). Percentage of glottic opening was significantly higher in group C (79.36 ± 13.42%) than in group M (53.49 ± 29.83%) (P = .000). The intubation difficulty scale score was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P = .030). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of malposition status, hemodynamic parameters, or visual analog scale score for a postoperative sore throat. CONCLUSION: Although the time taken for intubation was comparable between the 2 intubation devices, the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope facilitated glottis visualization and reduced the intubation difficulty scale better than the McCoy laryngoscope in patients undergoing DLT intubation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9666159/ /pubmed/36397435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031775 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 3300 Kim, Kyung Mi Seo, Kwon Hui Kim, You Jung John, Hyunji Moon, Hyun Soo Kim, Namhyun Yeon, Nayoung Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title | Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_full | Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_short | Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_sort | comparison of the c-mac d-blade video laryngoscope and the mccoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: a prospective randomized controlled study |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031775 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimkyungmi comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT seokwonhui comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kimyoujung comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT johnhyunji comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT moonhyunsoo comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kimnamhyun comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT yeonnayoung comparisonofthecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopeandthemccoylaryngoscopefordoublelumenendotrachealtubeintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy |