Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE: ABM/P-15 (anorganic bone matrix/15-amino acid peptide fragment) is a commercially available synthetically manufactured P-15 collagen peptide fragment, that is adsorbed on ABM. This study was done to investigate the efficacy of ABM/P-15 in achieving fusion in the lumbar spine and comparing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sathe, Ashwin, Lee, Sang-Ho, Kim, Shin-Jae, Eun, Sang Soo, Choi, Yong Soo, Lee, Shih-min, Seuk, Ju-Wan, Lee, Yoon Sun, Shin, Sang-Ha, Bae, Junseok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurosurgical Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574583
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0296
_version_ 1784831459731701760
author Sathe, Ashwin
Lee, Sang-Ho
Kim, Shin-Jae
Eun, Sang Soo
Choi, Yong Soo
Lee, Shih-min
Seuk, Ju-Wan
Lee, Yoon Sun
Shin, Sang-Ha
Bae, Junseok
author_facet Sathe, Ashwin
Lee, Sang-Ho
Kim, Shin-Jae
Eun, Sang Soo
Choi, Yong Soo
Lee, Shih-min
Seuk, Ju-Wan
Lee, Yoon Sun
Shin, Sang-Ha
Bae, Junseok
author_sort Sathe, Ashwin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: ABM/P-15 (anorganic bone matrix/15-amino acid peptide fragment) is a commercially available synthetically manufactured P-15 collagen peptide fragment, that is adsorbed on ABM. This study was done to investigate the efficacy of ABM/P-15 in achieving fusion in the lumbar spine and comparing it with that of recombinant bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS: A retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data of 140 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgeries in a single specialty spine hospital between 2016 and 2020, with a minimum 6-month follow-up was conducted. Based on the material used for the augmentation of the bone graft at the fusion site, the patients were divided into three categories namely ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM group. RESULTS: ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM were used in 46, 44, and 50 patients, respectively. Patient characteristics like age, gender, bone mineral density, smoking history, and presence of diabetes mellitus were comparable amongst the three groups. Average follow-up was 16.0±5.2, 17.9±9.8, and 26.2±14.9 months, respectively in ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups. The fusion was achieved in 97.9%, 93.2%, and 98% patients while the average time-to-union was 4.05±2.01, 10±4.28, and 9.44±3.49 months (p<0.001), respectively for ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups. The average pre-operative Visual analogue scale score was 6.93±2.42, 7.14±1.97, 7.01±2.14 (p=0.900) for ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2 and DBM groups, respectively, which reduced to 1.02±0.80, 1.21±0.96, and 0.54±0.70 (p=0.112), respectively at the last follow up. Pre-operative Oswestry disability index scores were 52.7±18.02, 55.4±16.8, and 53.56±19.6 (p=0.751) in ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups, which post-operatively reduced to 33.77±15.52, 39.42±16.47, and 38.3±15.89 (p=0.412) and further to 15.74±8.3, 17.41±10.45, and 16.76±9.81 (p=0.603), respectively at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: ABM/P-15 appears to achieve union significantly earlier than rhBMP-2 and DBM in lumbar spinal fusion cases while maintaining a comparable clinical and complication profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96662402022-11-28 Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion Sathe, Ashwin Lee, Sang-Ho Kim, Shin-Jae Eun, Sang Soo Choi, Yong Soo Lee, Shih-min Seuk, Ju-Wan Lee, Yoon Sun Shin, Sang-Ha Bae, Junseok J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: ABM/P-15 (anorganic bone matrix/15-amino acid peptide fragment) is a commercially available synthetically manufactured P-15 collagen peptide fragment, that is adsorbed on ABM. This study was done to investigate the efficacy of ABM/P-15 in achieving fusion in the lumbar spine and comparing it with that of recombinant bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS: A retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data of 140 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgeries in a single specialty spine hospital between 2016 and 2020, with a minimum 6-month follow-up was conducted. Based on the material used for the augmentation of the bone graft at the fusion site, the patients were divided into three categories namely ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM group. RESULTS: ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM were used in 46, 44, and 50 patients, respectively. Patient characteristics like age, gender, bone mineral density, smoking history, and presence of diabetes mellitus were comparable amongst the three groups. Average follow-up was 16.0±5.2, 17.9±9.8, and 26.2±14.9 months, respectively in ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups. The fusion was achieved in 97.9%, 93.2%, and 98% patients while the average time-to-union was 4.05±2.01, 10±4.28, and 9.44±3.49 months (p<0.001), respectively for ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups. The average pre-operative Visual analogue scale score was 6.93±2.42, 7.14±1.97, 7.01±2.14 (p=0.900) for ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2 and DBM groups, respectively, which reduced to 1.02±0.80, 1.21±0.96, and 0.54±0.70 (p=0.112), respectively at the last follow up. Pre-operative Oswestry disability index scores were 52.7±18.02, 55.4±16.8, and 53.56±19.6 (p=0.751) in ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups, which post-operatively reduced to 33.77±15.52, 39.42±16.47, and 38.3±15.89 (p=0.412) and further to 15.74±8.3, 17.41±10.45, and 16.76±9.81 (p=0.603), respectively at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: ABM/P-15 appears to achieve union significantly earlier than rhBMP-2 and DBM in lumbar spinal fusion cases while maintaining a comparable clinical and complication profile. Korean Neurosurgical Society 2022-11 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9666240/ /pubmed/35574583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0296 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Neurosurgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Sathe, Ashwin
Lee, Sang-Ho
Kim, Shin-Jae
Eun, Sang Soo
Choi, Yong Soo
Lee, Shih-min
Seuk, Ju-Wan
Lee, Yoon Sun
Shin, Sang-Ha
Bae, Junseok
Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_short Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_sort comparative analysis of abm/p-15, bone morphogenic protein and demineralized bone matrix after instrumented lumbar interbody fusion
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574583
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0296
work_keys_str_mv AT satheashwin comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT leesangho comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT kimshinjae comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT eunsangsoo comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT choiyongsoo comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT leeshihmin comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT seukjuwan comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT leeyoonsun comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT shinsangha comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT baejunseok comparativeanalysisofabmp15bonemorphogenicproteinanddemineralizedbonematrixafterinstrumentedlumbarinterbodyfusion