Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: DW1601, an oral fixed dose combination syrup composed of DW16011 and Pelargonium sidoides, was developed to enhance the symptom relief effect in patients with acute bronchitis. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of DW1601 compared to DW16011 or P. sidoides for treatment of acute b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Young Seok, Lim, Seong Yong, Min, Kyung Hoon, Kim, Do Jin, Yoo, Kwang Ha, Kim, Tae-Bum, Kim, Hak-Ryul, Shim, Jae Jeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2022.104
_version_ 1784831460923932672
author Lee, Young Seok
Lim, Seong Yong
Min, Kyung Hoon
Kim, Do Jin
Yoo, Kwang Ha
Kim, Tae-Bum
Kim, Hak-Ryul
Shim, Jae Jeong
author_facet Lee, Young Seok
Lim, Seong Yong
Min, Kyung Hoon
Kim, Do Jin
Yoo, Kwang Ha
Kim, Tae-Bum
Kim, Hak-Ryul
Shim, Jae Jeong
author_sort Lee, Young Seok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: DW1601, an oral fixed dose combination syrup composed of DW16011 and Pelargonium sidoides, was developed to enhance the symptom relief effect in patients with acute bronchitis. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of DW1601 compared to DW16011 or P. sidoides for treatment of acute bronchitis using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial design. METHODS: A total of 204 patients with acute bronchitis was randomized 1:1:1 to receive DW1601 (n = 67), DW16011 (n = 70), or P. sidoides (n = 64) for 7 days. The primary outcome was efficacy of DW1601 compared to DW16011 or P. sidoides in reducing the total bronchitis severity score (BSS) at day 4 of treatment. Secondary endpoints were changes in total and symptom-specific BSS, response rate and patient satisfaction rate. Safety analysis was assessed at day 7. RESULTS: At 4 days after medication, decrease of total BSS from baseline was significantly greater in the DW1601 group than in the DW16011 group (−3.51 ± 0.18 vs. −2.65 ± 0.18, p = 0.001) or P. sidoides group (−3.56 ± 0.18 vs. −2.64 ± 0.19, p < 0.001). In addition, the BSS total score at day 7 and the BSS cough and sputum component scores at days 4 and 7 were significantly more improved with DW1601 treatment compared with the DW16011 group or P. sidoides group. Participants treated with DW1601 showed higher rates of response and satisfaction than control groups (response rate, DW1601, 100% vs. DW16011, 85.7% vs. P. sidoides, 85.9%; satisfaction rate, DW1601, 92.6% vs. DW16011, 82.9% vs. P. sidoides, 81.2%). Significant adverse events were not observed in the DW1601 group. CONCLUSIONS: DW1601 is superior to DW16011 or P. sidoides in improving symptoms of acute bronchitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96662452022-11-28 The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial Lee, Young Seok Lim, Seong Yong Min, Kyung Hoon Kim, Do Jin Yoo, Kwang Ha Kim, Tae-Bum Kim, Hak-Ryul Shim, Jae Jeong Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: DW1601, an oral fixed dose combination syrup composed of DW16011 and Pelargonium sidoides, was developed to enhance the symptom relief effect in patients with acute bronchitis. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of DW1601 compared to DW16011 or P. sidoides for treatment of acute bronchitis using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial design. METHODS: A total of 204 patients with acute bronchitis was randomized 1:1:1 to receive DW1601 (n = 67), DW16011 (n = 70), or P. sidoides (n = 64) for 7 days. The primary outcome was efficacy of DW1601 compared to DW16011 or P. sidoides in reducing the total bronchitis severity score (BSS) at day 4 of treatment. Secondary endpoints were changes in total and symptom-specific BSS, response rate and patient satisfaction rate. Safety analysis was assessed at day 7. RESULTS: At 4 days after medication, decrease of total BSS from baseline was significantly greater in the DW1601 group than in the DW16011 group (−3.51 ± 0.18 vs. −2.65 ± 0.18, p = 0.001) or P. sidoides group (−3.56 ± 0.18 vs. −2.64 ± 0.19, p < 0.001). In addition, the BSS total score at day 7 and the BSS cough and sputum component scores at days 4 and 7 were significantly more improved with DW1601 treatment compared with the DW16011 group or P. sidoides group. Participants treated with DW1601 showed higher rates of response and satisfaction than control groups (response rate, DW1601, 100% vs. DW16011, 85.7% vs. P. sidoides, 85.9%; satisfaction rate, DW1601, 92.6% vs. DW16011, 82.9% vs. P. sidoides, 81.2%). Significant adverse events were not observed in the DW1601 group. CONCLUSIONS: DW1601 is superior to DW16011 or P. sidoides in improving symptoms of acute bronchitis. Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2022-11 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9666245/ /pubmed/36153858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2022.104 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Young Seok
Lim, Seong Yong
Min, Kyung Hoon
Kim, Do Jin
Yoo, Kwang Ha
Kim, Tae-Bum
Kim, Hak-Ryul
Shim, Jae Jeong
The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial
title The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial
title_full The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial
title_short The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of dw1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase iii clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2022.104
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyoungseok theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT limseongyong theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT minkyunghoon theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT kimdojin theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT yookwangha theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT kimtaebum theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT kimhakryul theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT shimjaejeong theefficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT leeyoungseok efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT limseongyong efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT minkyunghoon efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT kimdojin efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT yookwangha efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT kimtaebum efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT kimhakryul efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT shimjaejeong efficacyandsafetyofdw1601inpatientswithacutebronchitisamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiiclinicaltrial