Cargando…

Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves

BACKGROUND: Conduction disorders (CD) are the most common complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). The last generation of Edwards balloon expandable valves, the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U), is provided with an external sealing skirt that aims to further reduce paravalvular leakag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monizzi, Giovanni, Olivares, Paolo, Makmur, Giulio, Fabbiocchi, Franco, Grancini, Luca, Mastrangelo, Angelo, Ferrari, Cristina, Galli, Stefano, Montorsi, Piero, Bartorelli, Antonio L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.922696
_version_ 1784831500420644864
author Monizzi, Giovanni
Olivares, Paolo
Makmur, Giulio
Fabbiocchi, Franco
Grancini, Luca
Mastrangelo, Angelo
Ferrari, Cristina
Galli, Stefano
Montorsi, Piero
Bartorelli, Antonio L.
author_facet Monizzi, Giovanni
Olivares, Paolo
Makmur, Giulio
Fabbiocchi, Franco
Grancini, Luca
Mastrangelo, Angelo
Ferrari, Cristina
Galli, Stefano
Montorsi, Piero
Bartorelli, Antonio L.
author_sort Monizzi, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conduction disorders (CD) are the most common complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). The last generation of Edwards balloon expandable valves, the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U), is provided with an external sealing skirt that aims to further reduce paravalvular leakage (PVL) compared to SAPIEN 3 (S3) and could potentially lead to higher CD rate. We sought to investigate the rate of new-onset CD in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 or S3U valve. METHODS: We included 582 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in a single high-volume Center. Patients with previously implanted pacemaker and Valve in valve procedures were excluded. CD rate was evaluated early after implantation and at discharge. RESULTS: No significant difference in the overall CD rate was found between S3 and S3U patients both immediately after the procedure (S3 45.5% vs. S3U 41.8%, p = 0.575) and at discharge (S3 30.4% vs. S3U 35.6%, p = 0.348) with low rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (S3 6.3% vs. S3U 5.5%, p = 0.749). No significant differences were found also in patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (S3 8.2% vs. S3U 5%, p = 0.648). A significantly lower rate of PVL was found with S3U compared to S3 (S3 42% vs. S3U 26%, p = 0.007). According to the manufacturer’s guidelines we confirmed that S3U were implanted in a significantly higher position compared to S3 (S3 4.89 ± 1.57 mm vs. S3U 4.47 ± 1.36 mm, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the rate of CD, including the need for PPM implantation, was found in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 compared to S3U. Moreover, S3U significantly reduced the PVL rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96664212022-11-17 Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves Monizzi, Giovanni Olivares, Paolo Makmur, Giulio Fabbiocchi, Franco Grancini, Luca Mastrangelo, Angelo Ferrari, Cristina Galli, Stefano Montorsi, Piero Bartorelli, Antonio L. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Conduction disorders (CD) are the most common complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). The last generation of Edwards balloon expandable valves, the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U), is provided with an external sealing skirt that aims to further reduce paravalvular leakage (PVL) compared to SAPIEN 3 (S3) and could potentially lead to higher CD rate. We sought to investigate the rate of new-onset CD in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 or S3U valve. METHODS: We included 582 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in a single high-volume Center. Patients with previously implanted pacemaker and Valve in valve procedures were excluded. CD rate was evaluated early after implantation and at discharge. RESULTS: No significant difference in the overall CD rate was found between S3 and S3U patients both immediately after the procedure (S3 45.5% vs. S3U 41.8%, p = 0.575) and at discharge (S3 30.4% vs. S3U 35.6%, p = 0.348) with low rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (S3 6.3% vs. S3U 5.5%, p = 0.749). No significant differences were found also in patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (S3 8.2% vs. S3U 5%, p = 0.648). A significantly lower rate of PVL was found with S3U compared to S3 (S3 42% vs. S3U 26%, p = 0.007). According to the manufacturer’s guidelines we confirmed that S3U were implanted in a significantly higher position compared to S3 (S3 4.89 ± 1.57 mm vs. S3U 4.47 ± 1.36 mm, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the rate of CD, including the need for PPM implantation, was found in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 compared to S3U. Moreover, S3U significantly reduced the PVL rate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9666421/ /pubmed/36407470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.922696 Text en Copyright © 2022 Monizzi, Olivares, Makmur, Fabbiocchi, Grancini, Mastrangelo, Ferrari, Galli, Montorsi and Bartorelli. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Monizzi, Giovanni
Olivares, Paolo
Makmur, Giulio
Fabbiocchi, Franco
Grancini, Luca
Mastrangelo, Angelo
Ferrari, Cristina
Galli, Stefano
Montorsi, Piero
Bartorelli, Antonio L.
Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves
title Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves
title_full Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves
title_fullStr Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves
title_full_unstemmed Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves
title_short Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves
title_sort conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison between sapien 3 and sapien 3 ultra balloon-expandable valves
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.922696
work_keys_str_mv AT monizzigiovanni conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT olivarespaolo conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT makmurgiulio conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT fabbiocchifranco conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT granciniluca conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT mastrangeloangelo conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT ferraricristina conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT gallistefano conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT montorsipiero conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves
AT bartorelliantoniol conductiondisordersaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationacomparisonbetweensapien3andsapien3ultraballoonexpandablevalves