Cargando…
The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied
While it is widely acknowledged that Darwin’s descriptions of females were gender-biased, gender bias in current sexual selection research is less recognized. An examination of the history of sexual selection research shows prevalent male precedence—that research starts with male-centered investigat...
Autor principal: | Ah-King, Malin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36379954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34770-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Genital Evolution: Why Are Females Still Understudied?
por: Ah-King, Malin, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Cognitive decline assessment in speakers of understudied languages
por: Hatahet, Oula, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Aspirin for recurrence prevention in bipolar disorder—Promising, yet clinically understudied?
por: Haarman, Bartholomeus CM, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Hyperkalemia: Major but still understudied complication among heart transplant recipients
por: Singh, Jagmeet, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
New Translational Research Provides Insights into Liver Dysfunction in Sepsis
por: Marshall, John C.
Publicado: (2012)