Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES: Several therapies are available for the treatment of advanced/metastatic prostate cancer (PC). However, the systematic assessment of evidence pertaining to the use of these therapies in Asian patients is lacking. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using PubMed/Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saad, Marniza, Umbas, Rainy, Chiong, Edmund, Kanesvaran, Ravindran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359221131525
_version_ 1784831588903682048
author Saad, Marniza
Umbas, Rainy
Chiong, Edmund
Kanesvaran, Ravindran
author_facet Saad, Marniza
Umbas, Rainy
Chiong, Edmund
Kanesvaran, Ravindran
author_sort Saad, Marniza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Several therapies are available for the treatment of advanced/metastatic prostate cancer (PC). However, the systematic assessment of evidence pertaining to the use of these therapies in Asian patients is lacking. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using PubMed/Medline search in May 2021 to identify the randomized/nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs/non-RCTs) and real-world observational studies (prospective/retrospective). Only studies published as full manuscripts in English were included if reporting the efficacy, effectiveness, and/or safety of treatments in Asian patients with advanced/metastatic PC. RESULTS: Of the 1,898 retrieved publications, 24 studies were included. These studies had patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant PC (n = 2), metastatic castration-sensitive PC (n = 4), and metastatic castration-resistant PC (n = 18). Study designs included RCTs (n = 7), non-RCTs (n = 2), and real-world studies (n = 15). Treatments used in included studies were abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP; n = 6), enzalutamide, lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen ((177)Lu-PSMA; n = 4 each), docetaxel (n = 3), apalutamide, radium-223 (n = 2 each), darolutamide, cabazitaxel, and pembrolizumab (n = 1 each). The evidence from RCTs (i.e., ARAMIS, SPARTAN, ARCHES, TITAN, LATITUDE, PREVAIL) demonstrated the clinical benefits of apalutamide, darolutamide, enzalutamide, and AAP in terms of overall, disease-free, and metastasis-free survival in Asian patients. These treatments were reported to be well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified in Asian population. The efficacy and safety profiles in Asian patients were consistent with the overall trial population. Data from real-world studies supported the effectiveness and tolerability of AAP, enzalutamide, radium-223, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, (177)Lu-PSMA, and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic PC. CONCLUSIONS: This SLR of the Asian data on therapies for advanced PC from the pivotal and real-world studies confirms similar efficacy and safety outcomes, consistent with the results from the pivotal clinical trials. These findings will help clinicians make better treatment decisions in clinical practice for patients with advanced/metastatic PC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96668342022-11-17 Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review Saad, Marniza Umbas, Rainy Chiong, Edmund Kanesvaran, Ravindran Ther Adv Med Oncol Review OBJECTIVES: Several therapies are available for the treatment of advanced/metastatic prostate cancer (PC). However, the systematic assessment of evidence pertaining to the use of these therapies in Asian patients is lacking. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using PubMed/Medline search in May 2021 to identify the randomized/nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs/non-RCTs) and real-world observational studies (prospective/retrospective). Only studies published as full manuscripts in English were included if reporting the efficacy, effectiveness, and/or safety of treatments in Asian patients with advanced/metastatic PC. RESULTS: Of the 1,898 retrieved publications, 24 studies were included. These studies had patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant PC (n = 2), metastatic castration-sensitive PC (n = 4), and metastatic castration-resistant PC (n = 18). Study designs included RCTs (n = 7), non-RCTs (n = 2), and real-world studies (n = 15). Treatments used in included studies were abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP; n = 6), enzalutamide, lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen ((177)Lu-PSMA; n = 4 each), docetaxel (n = 3), apalutamide, radium-223 (n = 2 each), darolutamide, cabazitaxel, and pembrolizumab (n = 1 each). The evidence from RCTs (i.e., ARAMIS, SPARTAN, ARCHES, TITAN, LATITUDE, PREVAIL) demonstrated the clinical benefits of apalutamide, darolutamide, enzalutamide, and AAP in terms of overall, disease-free, and metastasis-free survival in Asian patients. These treatments were reported to be well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified in Asian population. The efficacy and safety profiles in Asian patients were consistent with the overall trial population. Data from real-world studies supported the effectiveness and tolerability of AAP, enzalutamide, radium-223, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, (177)Lu-PSMA, and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic PC. CONCLUSIONS: This SLR of the Asian data on therapies for advanced PC from the pivotal and real-world studies confirms similar efficacy and safety outcomes, consistent with the results from the pivotal clinical trials. These findings will help clinicians make better treatment decisions in clinical practice for patients with advanced/metastatic PC. SAGE Publications 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9666834/ /pubmed/36407784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359221131525 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Saad, Marniza
Umbas, Rainy
Chiong, Edmund
Kanesvaran, Ravindran
Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review
title Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review
title_full Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review
title_short Efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in Asia: Evidence from a systematic literature review
title_sort efficacy and safety of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in asia: evidence from a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359221131525
work_keys_str_mv AT saadmarniza efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforadvancedprostatecancerinasiaevidencefromasystematicliteraturereview
AT umbasrainy efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforadvancedprostatecancerinasiaevidencefromasystematicliteraturereview
AT chiongedmund efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforadvancedprostatecancerinasiaevidencefromasystematicliteraturereview
AT kanesvaranravindran efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforadvancedprostatecancerinasiaevidencefromasystematicliteraturereview