Cargando…

Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals

OBJECTIVES: To audit the transparent and open science standards of health and medical sciences journal policies and explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional study. SETTING: 19 journals listed in Google Scholar's Top Publications for health and medical sciences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gardener, Antoni D., Hick, Ellen J., Jacklin, Chloe, Tan, Gifford, Cashin, Aidan G., Lee, Hopin, Nunan, David, Toomey, Elaine C., Richards, Georgia C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704221132139
_version_ 1784831594855399424
author Gardener, Antoni D.
Hick, Ellen J.
Jacklin, Chloe
Tan, Gifford
Cashin, Aidan G.
Lee, Hopin
Nunan, David
Toomey, Elaine C.
Richards, Georgia C.
author_facet Gardener, Antoni D.
Hick, Ellen J.
Jacklin, Chloe
Tan, Gifford
Cashin, Aidan G.
Lee, Hopin
Nunan, David
Toomey, Elaine C.
Richards, Georgia C.
author_sort Gardener, Antoni D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To audit the transparent and open science standards of health and medical sciences journal policies and explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional study. SETTING: 19 journals listed in Google Scholar's Top Publications for health and medical sciences. PARTICIPANTS: Blood, Cell, Circulation, European Heart Journal, Gastroenterology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Nature Genetics, Nature Medicine, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science Translational Medicine, The British Medical Journal, The Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet, The Lancet Oncology, and The New England Journal of Medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guideline and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest (COIs) to evaluate journals standards. RESULTS: TOP scores slightly improved during the COVID-19 pandemic, from a median of 5 (IQR: 2–12.5) out of a possible 24 points in February 2020 to 7 (IQR: 4–12) in May 2021, but overall, scores were very low at both time points. Journal policies scored highest for their adherence to data transparency and scored lowest for preregistration of study protocols and analysis plans and the submission of replication studies. Most journals fulfilled all ICMJE provisions for reporting COIs before (84%; n  =  16) and during (95%; n  =  18) the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of practising open science. However, requirements for open science practices in audited policies were overall low, which may impede progress in health and medical research. As key stakeholders in disseminating research, journals should promote a research culture of greater transparency and more robust open science practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96668602022-11-17 Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals Gardener, Antoni D. Hick, Ellen J. Jacklin, Chloe Tan, Gifford Cashin, Aidan G. Lee, Hopin Nunan, David Toomey, Elaine C. Richards, Georgia C. JRSM Open Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To audit the transparent and open science standards of health and medical sciences journal policies and explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional study. SETTING: 19 journals listed in Google Scholar's Top Publications for health and medical sciences. PARTICIPANTS: Blood, Cell, Circulation, European Heart Journal, Gastroenterology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Nature Genetics, Nature Medicine, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science Translational Medicine, The British Medical Journal, The Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet, The Lancet Oncology, and The New England Journal of Medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guideline and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest (COIs) to evaluate journals standards. RESULTS: TOP scores slightly improved during the COVID-19 pandemic, from a median of 5 (IQR: 2–12.5) out of a possible 24 points in February 2020 to 7 (IQR: 4–12) in May 2021, but overall, scores were very low at both time points. Journal policies scored highest for their adherence to data transparency and scored lowest for preregistration of study protocols and analysis plans and the submission of replication studies. Most journals fulfilled all ICMJE provisions for reporting COIs before (84%; n  =  16) and during (95%; n  =  18) the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of practising open science. However, requirements for open science practices in audited policies were overall low, which may impede progress in health and medical research. As key stakeholders in disseminating research, journals should promote a research culture of greater transparency and more robust open science practices. SAGE Publications 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9666860/ /pubmed/36407750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704221132139 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Gardener, Antoni D.
Hick, Ellen J.
Jacklin, Chloe
Tan, Gifford
Cashin, Aidan G.
Lee, Hopin
Nunan, David
Toomey, Elaine C.
Richards, Georgia C.
Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals
title Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals
title_full Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals
title_fullStr Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals
title_full_unstemmed Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals
title_short Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals
title_sort open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the covid-19 pandemic: a repeat cross-sectional study: open science policies of medical journals
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704221132139
work_keys_str_mv AT gardenerantonid openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT hickellenj openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT jacklinchloe openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT tangifford openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT cashinaidang openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT leehopin openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT nunandavid openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT toomeyelainec openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals
AT richardsgeorgiac openscienceandconflictofinterestpoliciesofmedicalandhealthsciencesjournalsbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatcrosssectionalstudyopensciencepoliciesofmedicaljournals