Cargando…

The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze whether involved field irradiation (IFI) is associated with improving survival outcomes and reducing adverse events compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in patients of esophageal cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. SUMMA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hesong, Song, Chunyang, Zhao, Xiaohan, Deng, Wenzhao, Shen, Wenbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1034656
_version_ 1784831603504054272
author Wang, Hesong
Song, Chunyang
Zhao, Xiaohan
Deng, Wenzhao
Shen, Wenbin
author_facet Wang, Hesong
Song, Chunyang
Zhao, Xiaohan
Deng, Wenzhao
Shen, Wenbin
author_sort Wang, Hesong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze whether involved field irradiation (IFI) is associated with improving survival outcomes and reducing adverse events compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in patients of esophageal cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Radiotherapy plays an important role for not surgery patients. However, the role of radiation target size is still uncertain. METHODS: We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central for English and non-English publications comparing esophageal cancer patients who received radiotherapy with IFI with those with ENI. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and adverse events related to radiotherapy. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Standard for non-randomized studies. We evaluated the certainty of evidence by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: Totally, 23 studies with 4120 patients were included. IFI group demonstrated significant improvement in the OS rates at 5 years, but not at 1, 2, and 3 years, compared with the ENI group (pooled Risk Ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.90; P = 0.0004; high certainty). In addition, IFI demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of grade ≥2 acute esophagitis (AE) (pooled RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69–0.90; P = 0.0005; high certainty) and grade ≥3 AE (pooled RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38–0.69; P < 0.00001; high certainty) compared with ENI, but not in the incidence of grades ≥3 acute pneumonia, late esophagitis, and late pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ENI, IFI demonstrated significant improvement in OS at 5 years. The addition of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to IFI increased the 5-year OS; however, similar results were not observed with the addition of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to IFI and ENI. Furthermore, IFI demonstrated a significant decrease in grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 AE, while IMRT demonstrated no difference in the incidence of grade ≥3 AE. IFI and ENI do not differ in the incidence of grades ≥3 acute pneumonia, late esophagitis, and late pneumonia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96668942022-11-17 The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Hesong Song, Chunyang Zhao, Xiaohan Deng, Wenzhao Shen, Wenbin Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze whether involved field irradiation (IFI) is associated with improving survival outcomes and reducing adverse events compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in patients of esophageal cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Radiotherapy plays an important role for not surgery patients. However, the role of radiation target size is still uncertain. METHODS: We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central for English and non-English publications comparing esophageal cancer patients who received radiotherapy with IFI with those with ENI. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and adverse events related to radiotherapy. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Standard for non-randomized studies. We evaluated the certainty of evidence by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: Totally, 23 studies with 4120 patients were included. IFI group demonstrated significant improvement in the OS rates at 5 years, but not at 1, 2, and 3 years, compared with the ENI group (pooled Risk Ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.90; P = 0.0004; high certainty). In addition, IFI demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of grade ≥2 acute esophagitis (AE) (pooled RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69–0.90; P = 0.0005; high certainty) and grade ≥3 AE (pooled RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38–0.69; P < 0.00001; high certainty) compared with ENI, but not in the incidence of grades ≥3 acute pneumonia, late esophagitis, and late pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ENI, IFI demonstrated significant improvement in OS at 5 years. The addition of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to IFI increased the 5-year OS; however, similar results were not observed with the addition of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to IFI and ENI. Furthermore, IFI demonstrated a significant decrease in grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 AE, while IMRT demonstrated no difference in the incidence of grade ≥3 AE. IFI and ENI do not differ in the incidence of grades ≥3 acute pneumonia, late esophagitis, and late pneumonia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9666894/ /pubmed/36408184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1034656 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Song, Zhao, Deng and Shen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Hesong
Song, Chunyang
Zhao, Xiaohan
Deng, Wenzhao
Shen, Wenbin
The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1034656
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghesong theroleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songchunyang theroleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoxiaohan theroleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dengwenzhao theroleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenwenbin theroleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghesong roleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songchunyang roleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoxiaohan roleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dengwenzhao roleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenwenbin roleofinvolvedfieldirradiationversuselectivenodalirradiationindefinitiveradiotherapyorchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis