Cargando…
Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study
INTRODUCTION: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is one of the most serious complications and causes of death in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) model based on the light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.986867 |
_version_ | 1784831640459018240 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jitao Zheng, Tianlei Liao, Yong Geng, Shi Li, Jinlong Zhang, Zhanguo Shang, Dong Liu, Chengyu Yu, Peng Huang, Yifei Liu, Chuan Liu, Yanna Liu, Shanghao Wang, Mingguang Liu, Dengxiang Miao, Hongrui Li, Shuang Zhang, Biao Huang, Anliang Zhang, Yewei Qi, Xiaolong Chen, Shubo |
author_facet | Wang, Jitao Zheng, Tianlei Liao, Yong Geng, Shi Li, Jinlong Zhang, Zhanguo Shang, Dong Liu, Chengyu Yu, Peng Huang, Yifei Liu, Chuan Liu, Yanna Liu, Shanghao Wang, Mingguang Liu, Dengxiang Miao, Hongrui Li, Shuang Zhang, Biao Huang, Anliang Zhang, Yewei Qi, Xiaolong Chen, Shubo |
author_sort | Wang, Jitao |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is one of the most serious complications and causes of death in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) model based on the light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) algorithm for predicting PHLF. METHODS: A total of 875 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy were randomized into a training cohort (n=612), a validation cohort (n=88), and a testing cohort (n=175). Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) was performed to determine the importance of individual variables. By combining these independent risk factors, an ML model for predicting PHLF was established. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and decision curve analyses (DCA) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the ML model and compare it to that of other noninvasive models. RESULTS: The AUCs of the ML model for predicting PHLF in the training cohort, validation cohort, and testing cohort were 0.944, 0.870, and 0.822, respectively. The ML model had a higher AUC for predicting PHLF than did other non-invasive models. The ML model for predicting PHLF was found to be more valuable than other noninvasive models. CONCLUSION: A novel ML model for the prediction of PHLF using common clinical parameters was constructed and validated. The novel ML model performed better than did existing noninvasive models for the prediction of PHLF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9667038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96670382022-11-17 Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study Wang, Jitao Zheng, Tianlei Liao, Yong Geng, Shi Li, Jinlong Zhang, Zhanguo Shang, Dong Liu, Chengyu Yu, Peng Huang, Yifei Liu, Chuan Liu, Yanna Liu, Shanghao Wang, Mingguang Liu, Dengxiang Miao, Hongrui Li, Shuang Zhang, Biao Huang, Anliang Zhang, Yewei Qi, Xiaolong Chen, Shubo Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is one of the most serious complications and causes of death in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) model based on the light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) algorithm for predicting PHLF. METHODS: A total of 875 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy were randomized into a training cohort (n=612), a validation cohort (n=88), and a testing cohort (n=175). Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) was performed to determine the importance of individual variables. By combining these independent risk factors, an ML model for predicting PHLF was established. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and decision curve analyses (DCA) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the ML model and compare it to that of other noninvasive models. RESULTS: The AUCs of the ML model for predicting PHLF in the training cohort, validation cohort, and testing cohort were 0.944, 0.870, and 0.822, respectively. The ML model had a higher AUC for predicting PHLF than did other non-invasive models. The ML model for predicting PHLF was found to be more valuable than other noninvasive models. CONCLUSION: A novel ML model for the prediction of PHLF using common clinical parameters was constructed and validated. The novel ML model performed better than did existing noninvasive models for the prediction of PHLF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9667038/ /pubmed/36408144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.986867 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Zheng, Liao, Geng, Li, Zhang, Shang, Liu, Yu, Huang, Liu, Liu, Liu, Wang, Liu, Miao, Li, Zhang, Huang, Zhang, Qi and Chen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Wang, Jitao Zheng, Tianlei Liao, Yong Geng, Shi Li, Jinlong Zhang, Zhanguo Shang, Dong Liu, Chengyu Yu, Peng Huang, Yifei Liu, Chuan Liu, Yanna Liu, Shanghao Wang, Mingguang Liu, Dengxiang Miao, Hongrui Li, Shuang Zhang, Biao Huang, Anliang Zhang, Yewei Qi, Xiaolong Chen, Shubo Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study |
title | Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study |
title_full | Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study |
title_short | Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study |
title_sort | machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.986867 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjitao machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT zhengtianlei machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT liaoyong machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT gengshi machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT lijinlong machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT zhangzhanguo machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT shangdong machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT liuchengyu machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT yupeng machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT huangyifei machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT liuchuan machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT liuyanna machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT liushanghao machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT wangmingguang machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT liudengxiang machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT miaohongrui machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT lishuang machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT zhangbiao machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT huanganliang machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT zhangyewei machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT qixiaolong machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy AT chenshubo machinelearningpredictionmodelforposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterstudy |