Cargando…

Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE: Total package time, or the time from diagnosis to completion of definitive treatment, has been associated with outcomes for a variety of tumor sites, but especially to head and neck (HN) cancer. Patients with HN cancer often undergo a complex diagnosis and treatment process involving multip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duggar, William N., Weatherall, Lacey, Nittala, Mary R., Thomas, Toms V., Mundra, Eswar K., Otts, Jeremy, Woods, William C., Yang, Claus, Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101117
_version_ 1784831669608382464
author Duggar, William N.
Weatherall, Lacey
Nittala, Mary R.
Thomas, Toms V.
Mundra, Eswar K.
Otts, Jeremy
Woods, William C.
Yang, Claus
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
author_facet Duggar, William N.
Weatherall, Lacey
Nittala, Mary R.
Thomas, Toms V.
Mundra, Eswar K.
Otts, Jeremy
Woods, William C.
Yang, Claus
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
author_sort Duggar, William N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Total package time, or the time from diagnosis to completion of definitive treatment, has been associated with outcomes for a variety of tumor sites, but especially to head and neck (HN) cancer. Patients with HN cancer often undergo a complex diagnosis and treatment process involving multiple disciplines both within and outside of oncology. This complexity can lead to longer package times, and each involved discipline has the responsibility to maintain an efficient and effective process. Strategic intervention to improve package time must involve not only new technology or tools, but also “soft” components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership. This combination is necessary to truly optimize radiation therapy for HN cancer, leading to shorter total package times for these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two interventions were strategically executed to improve radiation therapy workflow: upgrade of the treatment planning system and implementation of an automated patient management and accountability system. The radiation therapy–related timelines of 112 patients with HN cancer treated over 2 years were reviewed, and the average time differences were compared between the patient populations before and after the strategic interventions. RESULTS: Purely upgrading the treatment planning system did not show significant improvements, but when combined with the patient management system, significant improvement in radiation-related package time can be noted for every time point. The overall reduction of radiation-related package time was statistically significant at 22.85 days (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: On face value, the patient management system could be credited as responsible for the improvement, but on qualitative analysis, it is noted that the new system is only a tool that can be ignored or underused. Owing to the addition of important “soft” components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership, the patient management system was optimized and implemented in such a manner as to have the desired effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9667191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96671912022-11-17 Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer Duggar, William N. Weatherall, Lacey Nittala, Mary R. Thomas, Toms V. Mundra, Eswar K. Otts, Jeremy Woods, William C. Yang, Claus Vijayakumar, Srinivasan Adv Radiat Oncol Research Letter PURPOSE: Total package time, or the time from diagnosis to completion of definitive treatment, has been associated with outcomes for a variety of tumor sites, but especially to head and neck (HN) cancer. Patients with HN cancer often undergo a complex diagnosis and treatment process involving multiple disciplines both within and outside of oncology. This complexity can lead to longer package times, and each involved discipline has the responsibility to maintain an efficient and effective process. Strategic intervention to improve package time must involve not only new technology or tools, but also “soft” components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership. This combination is necessary to truly optimize radiation therapy for HN cancer, leading to shorter total package times for these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two interventions were strategically executed to improve radiation therapy workflow: upgrade of the treatment planning system and implementation of an automated patient management and accountability system. The radiation therapy–related timelines of 112 patients with HN cancer treated over 2 years were reviewed, and the average time differences were compared between the patient populations before and after the strategic interventions. RESULTS: Purely upgrading the treatment planning system did not show significant improvements, but when combined with the patient management system, significant improvement in radiation-related package time can be noted for every time point. The overall reduction of radiation-related package time was statistically significant at 22.85 days (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: On face value, the patient management system could be credited as responsible for the improvement, but on qualitative analysis, it is noted that the new system is only a tool that can be ignored or underused. Owing to the addition of important “soft” components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership, the patient management system was optimized and implemented in such a manner as to have the desired effect. Elsevier 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9667191/ /pubmed/36407682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101117 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Duggar, William N.
Weatherall, Lacey
Nittala, Mary R.
Thomas, Toms V.
Mundra, Eswar K.
Otts, Jeremy
Woods, William C.
Yang, Claus
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer
title Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer
title_full Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer
title_fullStr Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer
title_short Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer
title_sort strategic reduction of package time in head and neck cancer
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101117
work_keys_str_mv AT duggarwilliamn strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT weatheralllacey strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT nittalamaryr strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT thomastomsv strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT mundraeswark strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT ottsjeremy strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT woodswilliamc strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT yangclaus strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer
AT vijayakumarsrinivasan strategicreductionofpackagetimeinheadandneckcancer