Cargando…

A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) is strongly linked to the survivorship of gastric cancer (GC). The goal of this study was to assess the prognostic implications of the ELNs number and to construct an ELNs-based risk signature and nomogram model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Huling, Lin, Dandan, Yu, Zhen, Li, Hui, Zhao, Shi, Hainisayimu, Tuersun, Liu, Lin, Wang, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.947802
_version_ 1784831695555395584
author Li, Huling
Lin, Dandan
Yu, Zhen
Li, Hui
Zhao, Shi
Hainisayimu, Tuersun
Liu, Lin
Wang, Kai
author_facet Li, Huling
Lin, Dandan
Yu, Zhen
Li, Hui
Zhao, Shi
Hainisayimu, Tuersun
Liu, Lin
Wang, Kai
author_sort Li, Huling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) is strongly linked to the survivorship of gastric cancer (GC). The goal of this study was to assess the prognostic implications of the ELNs number and to construct an ELNs-based risk signature and nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) characteristics in GC patients. METHODS: This inception cohort study included 19,317 GC patients from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, who were separated into a training group and an internal validation group. The nomogram was built with the training set, then internally verified with SEER data, and externally validated with two different data sets. Based on the RNA-seq data, ELNs-related DERNAs (DElncRNAs, DEmiRNAs, andDEmRNAs) and immune cells were identified. The LASSO–Cox regression analysis was utilized to construct ELNs-related DERNAs and immune cell prognostic signature in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. The OS of subgroups with high- and low-ELN signature was compared using the Kaplan–Meier (K-M) analysis. A nomogram was successfully constructed based on the ELNs signature and other clinical characteristics. The concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were all used to evaluate the nomogram model. The meta-analysis, the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database, and reverse transcription–quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were utilized to validate the RNA expression or abundance of prognostic genes and immune cells between GC tissues and normal gastric tissues, respectively. Finally, we analyzed the correlations between immune checkpoints, chemotherapy drug sensitivity, and risk score. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed that the high ELNs improved OS compared with low ELNs (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.659, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.626–0.694, p < 0.0001). Using the training set, a nomogram incorporating ELNs was built and proven to have good calibration and discrimination (C-index [95% CI], 0.714 [0.710–0.718]), which was validated in the internal validation set (C-index [95% CI], 0.720 [0.714–0.726]), the TCGA set (C-index [95% CI], 0.693 [0.662–0.724]), and the Chinese set (C-index [95% CI], 0.750 [0.720–0.782]). An ELNs-related signature model based on ELNs group, regulatory T cells (Tregs), neutrophils, CDKN2B-AS1, H19, HOTTIP, LINC00643, MIR663AHG, TMEM236, ZNF705A, and hsa-miR-135a-5p was constructed by the LASSO–Cox regression analysis. The result showed that OS was remarkably lower in patients with high-ELNs signature compared with those with low-ELN signature (HR = 2.418, 95% CI: 1.804–3.241, p < 0.001). This signature performed well in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival (AUC [95% CI] = 0.688 [0.612–0.763], 0.744 [0.659–0.830], and 0.778 [0.647–0.909], respectively). The multivariate Cox analysis illustrated that the risk score was an independent predictor of survival for patients with GC. Moreover, the expression of prognostic genes (LINC00643, TMEM236, and hsa-miR-135a-5p) displayed differences between GC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues. The C-index of the nomogram that can be used to predict the OS of GC patients was 0.710 (95% CI: 0.663–0.753). Both the calibration plots and DCA showed that the nomogram has good predictive performance. Moreover, the signature was significantly correlated with the N stage and T stage. According to our analysis, GC patients in the low-ELN signature group may have a better immunotherapy response and OS outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We explored the prognostic role of ELNs in GC and successfully constructed an ELNs signature linked to the GC prognosis in TCGA. The findings manifested that the signature is a powerful predictive indicator for patients with GC. The signature might contain potential biomarkers for treatment response prediction for GC patients. Additionally, we identified a novel and robust nomogram combining the characteristics of ELNs and clinical factors for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in GC patients, which will facilitate personalized survival prediction and aid clinical decision-making in GC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9667298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96672982022-11-17 A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer Li, Huling Lin, Dandan Yu, Zhen Li, Hui Zhao, Shi Hainisayimu, Tuersun Liu, Lin Wang, Kai Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) is strongly linked to the survivorship of gastric cancer (GC). The goal of this study was to assess the prognostic implications of the ELNs number and to construct an ELNs-based risk signature and nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) characteristics in GC patients. METHODS: This inception cohort study included 19,317 GC patients from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, who were separated into a training group and an internal validation group. The nomogram was built with the training set, then internally verified with SEER data, and externally validated with two different data sets. Based on the RNA-seq data, ELNs-related DERNAs (DElncRNAs, DEmiRNAs, andDEmRNAs) and immune cells were identified. The LASSO–Cox regression analysis was utilized to construct ELNs-related DERNAs and immune cell prognostic signature in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. The OS of subgroups with high- and low-ELN signature was compared using the Kaplan–Meier (K-M) analysis. A nomogram was successfully constructed based on the ELNs signature and other clinical characteristics. The concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were all used to evaluate the nomogram model. The meta-analysis, the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database, and reverse transcription–quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were utilized to validate the RNA expression or abundance of prognostic genes and immune cells between GC tissues and normal gastric tissues, respectively. Finally, we analyzed the correlations between immune checkpoints, chemotherapy drug sensitivity, and risk score. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed that the high ELNs improved OS compared with low ELNs (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.659, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.626–0.694, p < 0.0001). Using the training set, a nomogram incorporating ELNs was built and proven to have good calibration and discrimination (C-index [95% CI], 0.714 [0.710–0.718]), which was validated in the internal validation set (C-index [95% CI], 0.720 [0.714–0.726]), the TCGA set (C-index [95% CI], 0.693 [0.662–0.724]), and the Chinese set (C-index [95% CI], 0.750 [0.720–0.782]). An ELNs-related signature model based on ELNs group, regulatory T cells (Tregs), neutrophils, CDKN2B-AS1, H19, HOTTIP, LINC00643, MIR663AHG, TMEM236, ZNF705A, and hsa-miR-135a-5p was constructed by the LASSO–Cox regression analysis. The result showed that OS was remarkably lower in patients with high-ELNs signature compared with those with low-ELN signature (HR = 2.418, 95% CI: 1.804–3.241, p < 0.001). This signature performed well in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival (AUC [95% CI] = 0.688 [0.612–0.763], 0.744 [0.659–0.830], and 0.778 [0.647–0.909], respectively). The multivariate Cox analysis illustrated that the risk score was an independent predictor of survival for patients with GC. Moreover, the expression of prognostic genes (LINC00643, TMEM236, and hsa-miR-135a-5p) displayed differences between GC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues. The C-index of the nomogram that can be used to predict the OS of GC patients was 0.710 (95% CI: 0.663–0.753). Both the calibration plots and DCA showed that the nomogram has good predictive performance. Moreover, the signature was significantly correlated with the N stage and T stage. According to our analysis, GC patients in the low-ELN signature group may have a better immunotherapy response and OS outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We explored the prognostic role of ELNs in GC and successfully constructed an ELNs signature linked to the GC prognosis in TCGA. The findings manifested that the signature is a powerful predictive indicator for patients with GC. The signature might contain potential biomarkers for treatment response prediction for GC patients. Additionally, we identified a novel and robust nomogram combining the characteristics of ELNs and clinical factors for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in GC patients, which will facilitate personalized survival prediction and aid clinical decision-making in GC patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9667298/ /pubmed/36405735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.947802 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Lin, Yu, Li, Zhao, Hainisayimu, Liu and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Li, Huling
Lin, Dandan
Yu, Zhen
Li, Hui
Zhao, Shi
Hainisayimu, Tuersun
Liu, Lin
Wang, Kai
A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer
title A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer
title_full A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer
title_fullStr A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer
title_short A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer
title_sort nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes–related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.947802
work_keys_str_mv AT lihuling anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT lindandan anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT yuzhen anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT lihui anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT zhaoshi anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT hainisayimutuersun anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT liulin anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT wangkai anomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT lihuling nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT lindandan nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT yuzhen nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT lihui nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT zhaoshi nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT hainisayimutuersun nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT liulin nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer
AT wangkai nomogrammodelbasedonthenumberofexaminedlymphnodesrelatedsignaturetopredictprognosisandguideclinicaltherapyingastriccancer