Cargando…
Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science
Many fewer women than men hold senior academic positions, a widely recognized and increasing problem. Our goal is to identify effective and feasible solutions. We begin by providing an in-depth assessment of the drivers of this gender inequity. In our synthesis of existing data, we provide many line...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36382515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1837 |
_version_ | 1784831707793326080 |
---|---|
author | Meirmans, Stephanie Lamatsch, Dunja K. Neiman, Maurine |
author_facet | Meirmans, Stephanie Lamatsch, Dunja K. Neiman, Maurine |
author_sort | Meirmans, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many fewer women than men hold senior academic positions, a widely recognized and increasing problem. Our goal is to identify effective and feasible solutions. We begin by providing an in-depth assessment of the drivers of this gender inequity. In our synthesis of existing data, we provide many lines of evidence highlighting caregiving as a primary main factor. This is not a ‘new’ insight per se, but a point worth repeating that we back up by a strong and synthetic body of recent data. We also believe that our analysis provides a step forward in tackling a complex issue. We then develop a more detailed understanding of the challenges academic caregivers face and discuss whether and why it is important to keep caregivers in science. We find that the attrition due to caregiving should not be seen as a factor but rather as a process with multiple ‘sticky steps’ that eventually drive caregivers out of science—which, as we argue, is partly also good news. Indeed, it is here that we believe actions could be taken that would have a real impact: for example, one could effectively increase and expand upon current funding practices that focus on caregiver career advancement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9667356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96673562022-11-21 Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science Meirmans, Stephanie Lamatsch, Dunja K. Neiman, Maurine Proc Biol Sci Biological Science Practices Many fewer women than men hold senior academic positions, a widely recognized and increasing problem. Our goal is to identify effective and feasible solutions. We begin by providing an in-depth assessment of the drivers of this gender inequity. In our synthesis of existing data, we provide many lines of evidence highlighting caregiving as a primary main factor. This is not a ‘new’ insight per se, but a point worth repeating that we back up by a strong and synthetic body of recent data. We also believe that our analysis provides a step forward in tackling a complex issue. We then develop a more detailed understanding of the challenges academic caregivers face and discuss whether and why it is important to keep caregivers in science. We find that the attrition due to caregiving should not be seen as a factor but rather as a process with multiple ‘sticky steps’ that eventually drive caregivers out of science—which, as we argue, is partly also good news. Indeed, it is here that we believe actions could be taken that would have a real impact: for example, one could effectively increase and expand upon current funding practices that focus on caregiver career advancement. The Royal Society 2022-11-30 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9667356/ /pubmed/36382515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1837 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biological Science Practices Meirmans, Stephanie Lamatsch, Dunja K. Neiman, Maurine Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science |
title | Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science |
title_full | Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science |
title_fullStr | Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science |
title_full_unstemmed | Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science |
title_short | Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science |
title_sort | sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science |
topic | Biological Science Practices |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36382515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meirmansstephanie stickystepsandthegendergaphowthoughtfulpracticescouldhelpkeepcaregiversinscience AT lamatschdunjak stickystepsandthegendergaphowthoughtfulpracticescouldhelpkeepcaregiversinscience AT neimanmaurine stickystepsandthegendergaphowthoughtfulpracticescouldhelpkeepcaregiversinscience |