Cargando…

Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO

BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulation is considered as the most accurate method for dose calculation in radiotherapy. PRIMO is a Monte-Carlo program with a user-friendly graphical interface. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A VitalBeam with 6MV and 6MV flattening filter free (FFF), equipped with the 120 Millennium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yang, Sun, Xingru, Liang, Ying, Hu, Yuchao, Liu, Chenbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36384637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02149-5
_version_ 1784831753882435584
author Li, Yang
Sun, Xingru
Liang, Ying
Hu, Yuchao
Liu, Chenbin
author_facet Li, Yang
Sun, Xingru
Liang, Ying
Hu, Yuchao
Liu, Chenbin
author_sort Li, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulation is considered as the most accurate method for dose calculation in radiotherapy. PRIMO is a Monte-Carlo program with a user-friendly graphical interface. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A VitalBeam with 6MV and 6MV flattening filter free (FFF), equipped with the 120 Millennium multileaf collimator was simulated by PRIMO. We adjusted initial energy, energy full width at half maximum (FWHM), focal spot FWHM, and beam divergence to match the measurements. The water tank and ion-chamber were used in the measurement. Percentage depth dose (PDD) and off axis ratio (OAR) were evaluated with gamma passing rates (GPRs) implemented in PRIMO. PDDs were matched at different widths of standard square fields. OARs were matched at five depths. Transmission factor and dose leaf gap (DLG) were simulated. DLG was measured by electronic portal imaging device using a sweeping gap method. RESULT: For the criterion of 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm, the GPRs of 6MV PDD were 99.33–100%, 99–100%, and 99–100%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV FFF PDD were 99.33–100%, 98.99–99.66%, and 97.64–98.99%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV OAR were 96.4–100%, 90.99–100%, and 85.12–98.62%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV FFF OAR were 95.15–100%, 89.32–100%, and 87.02–99.74%, respectively. The calculated DLG matched well with the measurement (6MV: 1.36 mm vs. 1.41 mm; 6MV FFF: 1.07 mm vs. 1.03 mm, simulation vs measurement). The transmission factors were similar (6MV: 1.25% vs. 1.32%; 6MV FFF: 0.8% vs. 1.12%, simulation vs measurement). CONCLUSION: The calculated PDD, OAR, DLG and transmission factor were all in good agreement with measurements. PRIMO is an independent (with respect to analytical dose calculation algorithm) and accurate Monte Carlo tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02149-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9667592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96675922022-11-17 Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO Li, Yang Sun, Xingru Liang, Ying Hu, Yuchao Liu, Chenbin Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulation is considered as the most accurate method for dose calculation in radiotherapy. PRIMO is a Monte-Carlo program with a user-friendly graphical interface. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A VitalBeam with 6MV and 6MV flattening filter free (FFF), equipped with the 120 Millennium multileaf collimator was simulated by PRIMO. We adjusted initial energy, energy full width at half maximum (FWHM), focal spot FWHM, and beam divergence to match the measurements. The water tank and ion-chamber were used in the measurement. Percentage depth dose (PDD) and off axis ratio (OAR) were evaluated with gamma passing rates (GPRs) implemented in PRIMO. PDDs were matched at different widths of standard square fields. OARs were matched at five depths. Transmission factor and dose leaf gap (DLG) were simulated. DLG was measured by electronic portal imaging device using a sweeping gap method. RESULT: For the criterion of 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm, the GPRs of 6MV PDD were 99.33–100%, 99–100%, and 99–100%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV FFF PDD were 99.33–100%, 98.99–99.66%, and 97.64–98.99%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV OAR were 96.4–100%, 90.99–100%, and 85.12–98.62%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV FFF OAR were 95.15–100%, 89.32–100%, and 87.02–99.74%, respectively. The calculated DLG matched well with the measurement (6MV: 1.36 mm vs. 1.41 mm; 6MV FFF: 1.07 mm vs. 1.03 mm, simulation vs measurement). The transmission factors were similar (6MV: 1.25% vs. 1.32%; 6MV FFF: 0.8% vs. 1.12%, simulation vs measurement). CONCLUSION: The calculated PDD, OAR, DLG and transmission factor were all in good agreement with measurements. PRIMO is an independent (with respect to analytical dose calculation algorithm) and accurate Monte Carlo tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02149-5. BioMed Central 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9667592/ /pubmed/36384637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02149-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Yang
Sun, Xingru
Liang, Ying
Hu, Yuchao
Liu, Chenbin
Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO
title Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO
title_full Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO
title_fullStr Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO
title_full_unstemmed Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO
title_short Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO
title_sort monte carlo simulation of linac using primo
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36384637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02149-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liyang montecarlosimulationoflinacusingprimo
AT sunxingru montecarlosimulationoflinacusingprimo
AT liangying montecarlosimulationoflinacusingprimo
AT huyuchao montecarlosimulationoflinacusingprimo
AT liuchenbin montecarlosimulationoflinacusingprimo