Cargando…
Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Several studies have documented the production of wasteful research, defined as research of no scientific importance and/or not meeting societal needs. We argue that this redundancy in research may to a large degree be due to the lack of a systematic evaluation of the best available evid...
Autores principales: | Lund, Hans, Robinson, Karen A., Gjerland, Ane, Nykvist, Hanna, Drachen, Thea Marie, Christensen, Robin, Juhl, Carsten Bogh, Jamtvedt, Gro, Nortvedt, Monica, Bjerrum, Merete, Westmore, Matt, Yost, Jennifer, Brunnhuber, Klara |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36380367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02096-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
por: Andreasen, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
por: Draborg, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
EBRNetwork – a call to action for evidence-based research
por: Robinson, Karen A, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Bridge Building Model: connecting evidence-based practice, evidence-based research, public involvement and needs led research
por: Ormstad, Heidi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes — a scoping review of evidence syntheses
por: Lund, Hans, et al.
Publicado: (2022)