Cargando…
All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles
Ethics of technology systems have become an area of interest in academic research as well as international policy in recent years. Several organisation have consequently published principles of ethical artificial intelligence (AI) in line with this trend. The documents identify principles, values, a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36406882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00232-x |
_version_ | 1784831795634634752 |
---|---|
author | Rees, Connor Müller, Berndt |
author_facet | Rees, Connor Müller, Berndt |
author_sort | Rees, Connor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ethics of technology systems have become an area of interest in academic research as well as international policy in recent years. Several organisation have consequently published principles of ethical artificial intelligence (AI) in line with this trend. The documents identify principles, values, and other abstract requirements for AI development and deployment. Critics raise concerns about whether these documents are in fact constructive, or if they are produced as a higher form of virtue signalling. A theme that is beginning to become apparent in the academic literature regarding these documents is the inherent lack of effective and practical methods and processes for producing ethical AI. This article attempts a critical analysis which draws upon ethical AI documents from a range of contexts including company, organisational, governmental, and academic perspectives. Both the theoretical and practical components of AI guidelines are explored and analysed, consequently bringing to light the necessity of introducing a measurable component to such documents for the purpose of ensuring a positive outcome of deploying AI systems based on ethical principles. We propose a minimal framework for stakeholders to develop AI in an ethical and human-centred manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9667859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96678592022-11-16 All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles Rees, Connor Müller, Berndt AI Ethics Original Research Ethics of technology systems have become an area of interest in academic research as well as international policy in recent years. Several organisation have consequently published principles of ethical artificial intelligence (AI) in line with this trend. The documents identify principles, values, and other abstract requirements for AI development and deployment. Critics raise concerns about whether these documents are in fact constructive, or if they are produced as a higher form of virtue signalling. A theme that is beginning to become apparent in the academic literature regarding these documents is the inherent lack of effective and practical methods and processes for producing ethical AI. This article attempts a critical analysis which draws upon ethical AI documents from a range of contexts including company, organisational, governmental, and academic perspectives. Both the theoretical and practical components of AI guidelines are explored and analysed, consequently bringing to light the necessity of introducing a measurable component to such documents for the purpose of ensuring a positive outcome of deploying AI systems based on ethical principles. We propose a minimal framework for stakeholders to develop AI in an ethical and human-centred manner. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9667859/ /pubmed/36406882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00232-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rees, Connor Müller, Berndt All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles |
title | All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles |
title_full | All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles |
title_fullStr | All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles |
title_full_unstemmed | All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles |
title_short | All that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical AI principles |
title_sort | all that glitters is not gold: trustworthy and ethical ai principles |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36406882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00232-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reesconnor allthatglittersisnotgoldtrustworthyandethicalaiprinciples AT mullerberndt allthatglittersisnotgoldtrustworthyandethicalaiprinciples |