Cargando…

Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda

People are living, breathing creatures. Dominant feminist discourses are situated within hegemonic human exceptionalism (HHE) which, by framing the body in terms of human forms of meaning-making and social life, eschews first-order embodiment (or creatureliness) as worthy of inquiry. Here, well-know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dess, Nancy K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039210
_version_ 1784831811674701824
author Dess, Nancy K.
author_facet Dess, Nancy K.
author_sort Dess, Nancy K.
collection PubMed
description People are living, breathing creatures. Dominant feminist discourses are situated within hegemonic human exceptionalism (HHE) which, by framing the body in terms of human forms of meaning-making and social life, eschews first-order embodiment (or creatureliness) as worthy of inquiry. Here, well-known reasons for avoidance of “the biological” are briefly summarized and an argument is advanced for meta-theoretical centering of creatureliness. A three-pronged agenda is proposed that embraces the creaturely body without the “-isms” (e.g., essentialism) and “-izings” (e.g., so-called “naturalizing”) that subvert feminist commitments. By unsettling HHE, executing the agenda would promote broader feminist coalitions and new scholarly collaborations aimed at fleshing out gender.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9667943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96679432022-11-17 Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda Dess, Nancy K. Front Psychol Psychology People are living, breathing creatures. Dominant feminist discourses are situated within hegemonic human exceptionalism (HHE) which, by framing the body in terms of human forms of meaning-making and social life, eschews first-order embodiment (or creatureliness) as worthy of inquiry. Here, well-known reasons for avoidance of “the biological” are briefly summarized and an argument is advanced for meta-theoretical centering of creatureliness. A three-pronged agenda is proposed that embraces the creaturely body without the “-isms” (e.g., essentialism) and “-izings” (e.g., so-called “naturalizing”) that subvert feminist commitments. By unsettling HHE, executing the agenda would promote broader feminist coalitions and new scholarly collaborations aimed at fleshing out gender. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9667943/ /pubmed/36405113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039210 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dess. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Dess, Nancy K.
Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda
title Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda
title_full Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda
title_fullStr Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda
title_full_unstemmed Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda
title_short Stardust and feminism: A creatureliness agenda
title_sort stardust and feminism: a creatureliness agenda
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039210
work_keys_str_mv AT dessnancyk stardustandfeminismacreaturelinessagenda