Cargando…
Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
OBJECTIVE: Neratinib plus capecitabine (Ner+Cap) were proved to be clinically beneficial as a third-line treatment for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Ner+Cap fro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36379662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065299 |
_version_ | 1784831819414241280 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Yue Dong, Zhu Wang, Jiangfeng Fang, Qingxia |
author_facet | Wu, Yue Dong, Zhu Wang, Jiangfeng Fang, Qingxia |
author_sort | Wu, Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Neratinib plus capecitabine (Ner+Cap) were proved to be clinically beneficial as a third-line treatment for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Ner+Cap from the Chinese healthcare perspective. DESIGN: A three-state Markov simulation model was performed based on the results of NALA trial. The utilities of health state and disutilities of adverse events were derived from the published literature. Direct costs of anticancer agents, drug administration, routine follow-up and serious adverse events management were calculated in the model. Uncertainty was evaluated through univariate and probability sensitivity analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with confirmed HER2-positive MBC who previously received at least two HER2-targeted treatments and were aged ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. A total of 621 patients were enrolled in the NALA trial. INTERVENTIONS: Third-line treatment with Ner+Cap or lapatinib plus capecitabine (Lap+Cap). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary health outcomes of the model were costs, expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: When compared with Lap+Cap, Ner+Cap provided an additional 0.431 LYs and 0.339 QALYs, and increased the cost by $4299.2. The corresponding ICERs were 9970.1/LY and $12 670.2/QALY. Univariate sensitivity analyses suggested that the results were generally robust. Besides, Ner+Cap had a 100% probability of being cost-effective according to probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ner+Cap was likely to be a cost-effective regimen as the third-line therapy for women with HER2-positive MBC at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 653.0/QALY in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9667994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96679942022-11-17 Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis Wu, Yue Dong, Zhu Wang, Jiangfeng Fang, Qingxia BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: Neratinib plus capecitabine (Ner+Cap) were proved to be clinically beneficial as a third-line treatment for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Ner+Cap from the Chinese healthcare perspective. DESIGN: A three-state Markov simulation model was performed based on the results of NALA trial. The utilities of health state and disutilities of adverse events were derived from the published literature. Direct costs of anticancer agents, drug administration, routine follow-up and serious adverse events management were calculated in the model. Uncertainty was evaluated through univariate and probability sensitivity analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with confirmed HER2-positive MBC who previously received at least two HER2-targeted treatments and were aged ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. A total of 621 patients were enrolled in the NALA trial. INTERVENTIONS: Third-line treatment with Ner+Cap or lapatinib plus capecitabine (Lap+Cap). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary health outcomes of the model were costs, expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: When compared with Lap+Cap, Ner+Cap provided an additional 0.431 LYs and 0.339 QALYs, and increased the cost by $4299.2. The corresponding ICERs were 9970.1/LY and $12 670.2/QALY. Univariate sensitivity analyses suggested that the results were generally robust. Besides, Ner+Cap had a 100% probability of being cost-effective according to probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ner+Cap was likely to be a cost-effective regimen as the third-line therapy for women with HER2-positive MBC at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 653.0/QALY in China. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9667994/ /pubmed/36379662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065299 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Wu, Yue Dong, Zhu Wang, Jiangfeng Fang, Qingxia Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title | Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full | Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_fullStr | Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_short | Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_sort | neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for her2-positive metastatic breast cancer in china: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36379662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuyue neratinibpluscapecitabineversuslapatinibpluscapecitabineasthethirdlinetherapyforher2positivemetastaticbreastcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysis AT dongzhu neratinibpluscapecitabineversuslapatinibpluscapecitabineasthethirdlinetherapyforher2positivemetastaticbreastcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysis AT wangjiangfeng neratinibpluscapecitabineversuslapatinibpluscapecitabineasthethirdlinetherapyforher2positivemetastaticbreastcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysis AT fangqingxia neratinibpluscapecitabineversuslapatinibpluscapecitabineasthethirdlinetherapyforher2positivemetastaticbreastcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysis |