Cargando…
Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
We conducted the first profitability comparison study across health care industries in the United States, using the DuPont Analysis framework. The combination of Return on Equity (ROE) and ROE volatility was used to provide a comprehensive “risk-return” approach for profitability comparison. Based o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275245 |
_version_ | 1784831862567337984 |
---|---|
author | Bai, Ge Rajgopal, Shivaram Srivastava, Anup Zhao, Rong |
author_facet | Bai, Ge Rajgopal, Shivaram Srivastava, Anup Zhao, Rong |
author_sort | Bai, Ge |
collection | PubMed |
description | We conducted the first profitability comparison study across health care industries in the United States, using the DuPont Analysis framework. The combination of Return on Equity (ROE) and ROE volatility was used to provide a comprehensive “risk-return” approach for profitability comparison. Based on the 2010–2019 financial disclosures of 1,231 publicly traded health care companies in the U.S. that reported positive assets and equity, we estimated the industry-specific fixed effects on ROE and its three components—profit margin, asset utilization, and financial leverage—for ten industries in the health care sector, classified by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). For each industry, we also estimated its fixed effects on ROE volatility. We found that the pharmaceuticals industry and biotechnology industry have lower ROE—mainly driven by their relatively low profit margin and low assets utilization—and higher ROE volatility than other health care industries. We also found that the health care facilities industry relies most on debt financing. This study demonstrates a holistic approach for profitability comparison across industries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9668191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96681912022-11-17 Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 Bai, Ge Rajgopal, Shivaram Srivastava, Anup Zhao, Rong PLoS One Research Article We conducted the first profitability comparison study across health care industries in the United States, using the DuPont Analysis framework. The combination of Return on Equity (ROE) and ROE volatility was used to provide a comprehensive “risk-return” approach for profitability comparison. Based on the 2010–2019 financial disclosures of 1,231 publicly traded health care companies in the U.S. that reported positive assets and equity, we estimated the industry-specific fixed effects on ROE and its three components—profit margin, asset utilization, and financial leverage—for ten industries in the health care sector, classified by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). For each industry, we also estimated its fixed effects on ROE volatility. We found that the pharmaceuticals industry and biotechnology industry have lower ROE—mainly driven by their relatively low profit margin and low assets utilization—and higher ROE volatility than other health care industries. We also found that the health care facilities industry relies most on debt financing. This study demonstrates a holistic approach for profitability comparison across industries. Public Library of Science 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9668191/ /pubmed/36383519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275245 Text en © 2022 Bai et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bai, Ge Rajgopal, Shivaram Srivastava, Anup Zhao, Rong Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 |
title | Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 |
title_full | Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 |
title_fullStr | Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 |
title_full_unstemmed | Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 |
title_short | Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 |
title_sort | profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baige profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019 AT rajgopalshivaram profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019 AT srivastavaanup profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019 AT zhaorong profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019 |