Cargando…

Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019

We conducted the first profitability comparison study across health care industries in the United States, using the DuPont Analysis framework. The combination of Return on Equity (ROE) and ROE volatility was used to provide a comprehensive “risk-return” approach for profitability comparison. Based o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Ge, Rajgopal, Shivaram, Srivastava, Anup, Zhao, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275245
_version_ 1784831862567337984
author Bai, Ge
Rajgopal, Shivaram
Srivastava, Anup
Zhao, Rong
author_facet Bai, Ge
Rajgopal, Shivaram
Srivastava, Anup
Zhao, Rong
author_sort Bai, Ge
collection PubMed
description We conducted the first profitability comparison study across health care industries in the United States, using the DuPont Analysis framework. The combination of Return on Equity (ROE) and ROE volatility was used to provide a comprehensive “risk-return” approach for profitability comparison. Based on the 2010–2019 financial disclosures of 1,231 publicly traded health care companies in the U.S. that reported positive assets and equity, we estimated the industry-specific fixed effects on ROE and its three components—profit margin, asset utilization, and financial leverage—for ten industries in the health care sector, classified by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). For each industry, we also estimated its fixed effects on ROE volatility. We found that the pharmaceuticals industry and biotechnology industry have lower ROE—mainly driven by their relatively low profit margin and low assets utilization—and higher ROE volatility than other health care industries. We also found that the health care facilities industry relies most on debt financing. This study demonstrates a holistic approach for profitability comparison across industries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9668191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96681912022-11-17 Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019 Bai, Ge Rajgopal, Shivaram Srivastava, Anup Zhao, Rong PLoS One Research Article We conducted the first profitability comparison study across health care industries in the United States, using the DuPont Analysis framework. The combination of Return on Equity (ROE) and ROE volatility was used to provide a comprehensive “risk-return” approach for profitability comparison. Based on the 2010–2019 financial disclosures of 1,231 publicly traded health care companies in the U.S. that reported positive assets and equity, we estimated the industry-specific fixed effects on ROE and its three components—profit margin, asset utilization, and financial leverage—for ten industries in the health care sector, classified by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). For each industry, we also estimated its fixed effects on ROE volatility. We found that the pharmaceuticals industry and biotechnology industry have lower ROE—mainly driven by their relatively low profit margin and low assets utilization—and higher ROE volatility than other health care industries. We also found that the health care facilities industry relies most on debt financing. This study demonstrates a holistic approach for profitability comparison across industries. Public Library of Science 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9668191/ /pubmed/36383519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275245 Text en © 2022 Bai et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bai, Ge
Rajgopal, Shivaram
Srivastava, Anup
Zhao, Rong
Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
title Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
title_full Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
title_fullStr Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
title_full_unstemmed Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
title_short Profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
title_sort profitability and risk-return comparison across health care industries, evidence from publicly traded companies 2010–2019
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275245
work_keys_str_mv AT baige profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019
AT rajgopalshivaram profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019
AT srivastavaanup profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019
AT zhaorong profitabilityandriskreturncomparisonacrosshealthcareindustriesevidencefrompubliclytradedcompanies20102019