Cargando…

Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCE-MRL) is regularly reported as unable to depict lymphatic vessels in healthy limbs. In this study, we aim to improve lymph vessel conspicuity with appropriate registration and subtraction of a reference baseline image. Five unaffected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mills, Michael, Gordon, Kristiana, Ratnam, Lakshmi, van Zanten, Malou, Mortimer, Peter S, Ostergaard, Pia, Howe, Franklyn A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20210237
_version_ 1784831877414125568
author Mills, Michael
Gordon, Kristiana
Ratnam, Lakshmi
van Zanten, Malou
Mortimer, Peter S
Ostergaard, Pia
Howe, Franklyn A
author_facet Mills, Michael
Gordon, Kristiana
Ratnam, Lakshmi
van Zanten, Malou
Mortimer, Peter S
Ostergaard, Pia
Howe, Franklyn A
author_sort Mills, Michael
collection PubMed
description Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCE-MRL) is regularly reported as unable to depict lymphatic vessels in healthy limbs. In this study, we aim to improve lymph vessel conspicuity with appropriate registration and subtraction of a reference baseline image. Five unaffected individuals and a single unilateral primary lymphoedema patient were recruited to undergo fat suppressed 3D T (1) weighted spoiled gradient echo imaging of the lower limbs at 3.0 T. Images were quality assessed by two physicians and a medical physicist following registration via one of six registration pipelines, and subtraction of the first post-contrast dynamic image (PC1). Wilcoxon non-parametric testing was performed to compare image quality ranking vs the unregistered images and inter-rater reliability estimated using intraclass correlation coefficient. Signal enhancement curves were also computed in lymphatic vessels for two participants. Subtraction images were considered to improve lymphatic visibility, and three registration pipelines significantly (p < 0.05) outranked those without registration. Those registered to PC1 with an affine and elastic approach were rated best quality (p = 0.006). Moderate inter-rater reliability was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71) and signal enhancement behaviour appears affected by registration when motion is evident across the DCE-MRL series. We therefore conclude that lymphatic vessel visibility in DCE-MRL images can be improved with registration and baseline subtraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9668256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96682562022-11-29 Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs Mills, Michael Gordon, Kristiana Ratnam, Lakshmi van Zanten, Malou Mortimer, Peter S Ostergaard, Pia Howe, Franklyn A BJR Case Rep Technical Note Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCE-MRL) is regularly reported as unable to depict lymphatic vessels in healthy limbs. In this study, we aim to improve lymph vessel conspicuity with appropriate registration and subtraction of a reference baseline image. Five unaffected individuals and a single unilateral primary lymphoedema patient were recruited to undergo fat suppressed 3D T (1) weighted spoiled gradient echo imaging of the lower limbs at 3.0 T. Images were quality assessed by two physicians and a medical physicist following registration via one of six registration pipelines, and subtraction of the first post-contrast dynamic image (PC1). Wilcoxon non-parametric testing was performed to compare image quality ranking vs the unregistered images and inter-rater reliability estimated using intraclass correlation coefficient. Signal enhancement curves were also computed in lymphatic vessels for two participants. Subtraction images were considered to improve lymphatic visibility, and three registration pipelines significantly (p < 0.05) outranked those without registration. Those registered to PC1 with an affine and elastic approach were rated best quality (p = 0.006). Moderate inter-rater reliability was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71) and signal enhancement behaviour appears affected by registration when motion is evident across the DCE-MRL series. We therefore conclude that lymphatic vessel visibility in DCE-MRL images can be improved with registration and baseline subtraction. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9668256/ /pubmed/36451913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20210237 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Mills, Michael
Gordon, Kristiana
Ratnam, Lakshmi
van Zanten, Malou
Mortimer, Peter S
Ostergaard, Pia
Howe, Franklyn A
Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs
title Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs
title_full Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs
title_fullStr Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs
title_full_unstemmed Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs
title_short Image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) of the legs
title_sort image registration and subtraction in dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography (mrl) of the legs
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20210237
work_keys_str_mv AT millsmichael imageregistrationandsubtractionindynamicmagneticresonancelymphangiographymrlofthelegs
AT gordonkristiana imageregistrationandsubtractionindynamicmagneticresonancelymphangiographymrlofthelegs
AT ratnamlakshmi imageregistrationandsubtractionindynamicmagneticresonancelymphangiographymrlofthelegs
AT vanzantenmalou imageregistrationandsubtractionindynamicmagneticresonancelymphangiographymrlofthelegs
AT mortimerpeters imageregistrationandsubtractionindynamicmagneticresonancelymphangiographymrlofthelegs
AT ostergaardpia imageregistrationandsubtractionindynamicmagneticresonancelymphangiographymrlofthelegs
AT howefranklyna imageregistrationandsubtractionindynamicmagneticresonancelymphangiographymrlofthelegs