Cargando…

The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health

The development and delivery of religiously integrated health interventions is increasing, however lack of nomenclature to specify the religious components presents barriers to replication, implementation, and evidence synthesis. We describe the development of the “Religious Health Interventions in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Riya, Jong, Jonathan, Worthington, Everett L, Lycett, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac054
_version_ 1784831896495063040
author Patel, Riya
Jong, Jonathan
Worthington, Everett L
Lycett, Deborah
author_facet Patel, Riya
Jong, Jonathan
Worthington, Everett L
Lycett, Deborah
author_sort Patel, Riya
collection PubMed
description The development and delivery of religiously integrated health interventions is increasing, however lack of nomenclature to specify the religious components presents barriers to replication, implementation, and evidence synthesis. We describe the development of the “Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Sciences (RHIBS)” Taxonomy, the first scientific classification of religious intervention components to be used globally by chaplains, healthcare providers, and researchers interested in the scientific study of religion, spirituality, and health. We developed a taxonomy of empirically used religious intervention components in health, sought international cross-disciplinary consensus for definitions and tested its usability. Study 1: systematic review of intervention studies to identify religious components tested within healthcare; development of taxonomy nomenclature, definitions, and categories. Study 2: Delphi exercise with 19 international, cross-disciplinary experts from a variety of religions. Study 3: “think aloud” study and usability testing with 10 end-users. Study 1: 12,337 papers identified from search, 167 intervention studies included, plus an additional 74 from hand-searching 14 systematic reviews. A taxonomy of 191 religious components, grouped into 27 categories resulted. Study 2: two Delphi rounds resulted in international and cross-disciplinary consensus of a revised taxonomy of 81 religious components grouped into 23 categories. Study 3: usability testing by participants (range of disciplines, geography, and religions) led to a final taxonomy comprising 82 religious components grouped into 22 categories and supported by online training. The “RHIBS Taxonomy,” is the first multidisciplinary, global shared language within religion, spirituality, and health, ushering in a new era for religious interventions to be precisely defined, developed, and tested; shaping the evidence-base for future healthcare research/practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9668344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96683442022-11-17 The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health Patel, Riya Jong, Jonathan Worthington, Everett L Lycett, Deborah Transl Behav Med Original Research The development and delivery of religiously integrated health interventions is increasing, however lack of nomenclature to specify the religious components presents barriers to replication, implementation, and evidence synthesis. We describe the development of the “Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Sciences (RHIBS)” Taxonomy, the first scientific classification of religious intervention components to be used globally by chaplains, healthcare providers, and researchers interested in the scientific study of religion, spirituality, and health. We developed a taxonomy of empirically used religious intervention components in health, sought international cross-disciplinary consensus for definitions and tested its usability. Study 1: systematic review of intervention studies to identify religious components tested within healthcare; development of taxonomy nomenclature, definitions, and categories. Study 2: Delphi exercise with 19 international, cross-disciplinary experts from a variety of religions. Study 3: “think aloud” study and usability testing with 10 end-users. Study 1: 12,337 papers identified from search, 167 intervention studies included, plus an additional 74 from hand-searching 14 systematic reviews. A taxonomy of 191 religious components, grouped into 27 categories resulted. Study 2: two Delphi rounds resulted in international and cross-disciplinary consensus of a revised taxonomy of 81 religious components grouped into 23 categories. Study 3: usability testing by participants (range of disciplines, geography, and religions) led to a final taxonomy comprising 82 religious components grouped into 22 categories and supported by online training. The “RHIBS Taxonomy,” is the first multidisciplinary, global shared language within religion, spirituality, and health, ushering in a new era for religious interventions to be precisely defined, developed, and tested; shaping the evidence-base for future healthcare research/practice. Oxford University Press 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9668344/ /pubmed/36005838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac054 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Patel, Riya
Jong, Jonathan
Worthington, Everett L
Lycett, Deborah
The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
title The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
title_full The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
title_fullStr The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
title_full_unstemmed The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
title_short The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
title_sort development of the religious health interventions in behavioural science (rhibs) taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac054
work_keys_str_mv AT patelriya thedevelopmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth
AT jongjonathan thedevelopmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth
AT worthingtoneverettl thedevelopmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth
AT lycettdeborah thedevelopmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth
AT patelriya developmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth
AT jongjonathan developmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth
AT worthingtoneverettl developmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth
AT lycettdeborah developmentofthereligioushealthinterventionsinbehaviouralsciencerhibstaxonomyascientificclassificationofreligiouspracticesinhealth