Cargando…

Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Ruxolitinib for COVID-19–Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome*

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Ruxolitinib in Participants With COVID-19–Associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rein, Lindsay, Calero, Karel, Shah, Ronak, Ojielo, Charles, Hudock, Kristin M., Lodhi, Saba, Sadaka, Farid, Bellam, Shashi, Palma, Christopher, Hager, David N., Daniel, Jeannie, Schaub, Richard, O’Hayer, Kevin, Theodoropoulos, Nicole M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005682
Descripción
Sumario:Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Ruxolitinib in Participants With COVID-19–Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Require Mechanical Ventilation (RUXCOVID-DEVENT; NCT04377620). SETTING: Hospitals and community-based private or group practices in the United States (29 sites) and Russia (4 sites). PATIENTS: Eligible patients were greater than or equal to 12 years old, hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, and mechanically ventilated with a Pao(2)/Fio(2) of less than or equal to 300 mm Hg within 6 hours of randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive twice-daily ruxolitinib 15 mg, ruxolitinib 5 mg, or placebo, each plus standard therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint, 28-day mortality, was tested for each ruxolitinib group versus placebo using a mixed-effects logistic regression model and one-tailed significance test (significance threshold: p < 0.025); no type 1 error was allocated to secondary endpoints. Between May 24, 2020 and December 15, 2020, 211 patients (age range, 24–87 yr) were randomized (ruxolitinib 15/5 mg, n = 77/87; placebo, n = 47). Acute respiratory distress syndrome was categorized as severe in 27% of patients (58/211) at randomization; 90% (190/211) received concomitant steroids. Day-28 mortality was 51% (39/77; 95% CI, 39–62%) for ruxolitinib 15 mg, 53% (45/85; 95% CI, 42–64%) for ruxolitinib 5 mg, and 70% (33/47; 95% CI, 55–83%) for placebo. Neither ruxolitinib 15 mg (odds ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.201–1.028]; one-sided p = 0.029) nor 5 mg (odds ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.171–1.023]; one-sided p = 0.028) significantly reduced 28-day mortality versus placebo. Numerical improvements with ruxolitinib 15 mg versus placebo were observed in secondary outcomes including ventilator-, ICU-, and vasopressor-free days. Rates of overall and serious treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reduction in 28-day mortality rate between ruxolitinib and placebo in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome was not statistically significant; however, the trial was underpowered owing to early termination.