Cargando…

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning contouring (DLC) has the potential to decrease contouring time and variability of organ contours. This work evaluates the effectiveness of DLC for prostate and head and neck across four radiotherapy centres using a commercial system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Compu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Zoe, Bartley, Gary, Hague, Christina, Kelly, Daniel, Navarro, Clara, Rogers, Jane, South, Christopher, Temple, Simon, Whitehurst, Philip, Chuter, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003
_version_ 1784831977543696384
author Walker, Zoe
Bartley, Gary
Hague, Christina
Kelly, Daniel
Navarro, Clara
Rogers, Jane
South, Christopher
Temple, Simon
Whitehurst, Philip
Chuter, Robert
author_facet Walker, Zoe
Bartley, Gary
Hague, Christina
Kelly, Daniel
Navarro, Clara
Rogers, Jane
South, Christopher
Temple, Simon
Whitehurst, Philip
Chuter, Robert
author_sort Walker, Zoe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning contouring (DLC) has the potential to decrease contouring time and variability of organ contours. This work evaluates the effectiveness of DLC for prostate and head and neck across four radiotherapy centres using a commercial system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 123 prostate and 310 head and neck patients were evaluated. Besides one head and neck model, generic DLC models were used. Contouring time using centres’ existing clinical methods and contour editing time after DLC were compared. Timing was evaluated using paired and non-paired studies. Commercial software or in-house scripts assessed dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and distance to agreement (DTA). One centre assessed head and neck inter-observer variability. RESULTS: The mean contouring time saved for prostate structures using DLC compared to the existing clinical method was 5.9 ± 3.5 min. The best agreement was shown for the femoral heads (median DSC 0.92 ± 0.03, median DTA 1.5 ± 0.3 mm) and the worst for the rectum (median DSC 0.68 ± 0.04, median DTA 4.6 ± 0.6 mm). The mean contouring time saved for head and neck structures using DLC was 16.2 ± 8.6 min. For one centre there was no DLC time-saving compared to an atlas-based method. DLC contours reduced inter-observer variability compared to manual contours for the brainstem, left parotid gland and left submandibular gland. CONCLUSIONS: Generic prostate and head and neck DLC models can provide time-savings which can be assessed with paired or non-paired studies to integrate with clinical workload. Reducing inter-observer variability potential has been shown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9668733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96687332022-11-18 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres Walker, Zoe Bartley, Gary Hague, Christina Kelly, Daniel Navarro, Clara Rogers, Jane South, Christopher Temple, Simon Whitehurst, Philip Chuter, Robert Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning contouring (DLC) has the potential to decrease contouring time and variability of organ contours. This work evaluates the effectiveness of DLC for prostate and head and neck across four radiotherapy centres using a commercial system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 123 prostate and 310 head and neck patients were evaluated. Besides one head and neck model, generic DLC models were used. Contouring time using centres’ existing clinical methods and contour editing time after DLC were compared. Timing was evaluated using paired and non-paired studies. Commercial software or in-house scripts assessed dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and distance to agreement (DTA). One centre assessed head and neck inter-observer variability. RESULTS: The mean contouring time saved for prostate structures using DLC compared to the existing clinical method was 5.9 ± 3.5 min. The best agreement was shown for the femoral heads (median DSC 0.92 ± 0.03, median DTA 1.5 ± 0.3 mm) and the worst for the rectum (median DSC 0.68 ± 0.04, median DTA 4.6 ± 0.6 mm). The mean contouring time saved for head and neck structures using DLC was 16.2 ± 8.6 min. For one centre there was no DLC time-saving compared to an atlas-based method. DLC contours reduced inter-observer variability compared to manual contours for the brainstem, left parotid gland and left submandibular gland. CONCLUSIONS: Generic prostate and head and neck DLC models can provide time-savings which can be assessed with paired or non-paired studies to integrate with clinical workload. Reducing inter-observer variability potential has been shown. Elsevier 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9668733/ /pubmed/36405563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Walker, Zoe
Bartley, Gary
Hague, Christina
Kelly, Daniel
Navarro, Clara
Rogers, Jane
South, Christopher
Temple, Simon
Whitehurst, Philip
Chuter, Robert
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres
title Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres
title_full Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres
title_fullStr Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres
title_short Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of deep learning contouring across multiple radiotherapy centres
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerzoe evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT bartleygary evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT haguechristina evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT kellydaniel evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT navarroclara evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT rogersjane evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT southchristopher evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT templesimon evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT whitehurstphilip evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres
AT chuterrobert evaluatingtheeffectivenessofdeeplearningcontouringacrossmultipleradiotherapycentres