Cargando…
Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality
OBJECTIVES: Indirect computed tomography venography (CTV) is often the next imaging modality for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) when sonography is inconclusive. Our aim was to investigate the impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement (CE) and examination quality in CTV. METHODS: P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35554646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08841-0 |
_version_ | 1784831989755412480 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Thien Trung Kristiansen, Cathrine Helgestad Thomas, Owen Roy, Sumit Haidl, Felix Ashraf, Haseem Kløw, Nils Einar Stavem, Knut Lauritzen, Peter M. |
author_facet | Tran, Thien Trung Kristiansen, Cathrine Helgestad Thomas, Owen Roy, Sumit Haidl, Felix Ashraf, Haseem Kløw, Nils Einar Stavem, Knut Lauritzen, Peter M. |
author_sort | Tran, Thien Trung |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Indirect computed tomography venography (CTV) is often the next imaging modality for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) when sonography is inconclusive. Our aim was to investigate the impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement (CE) and examination quality in CTV. METHODS: Patients with clinical suspicion or clinical mimics of DVT in one large hospital were enrolled. Age, sex, body weight, height, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac output were registered. CTV of the popliteal veins was obtained at 30 s intervals at 30–210 s delays. The proportions of examinations with CE exceeding predefined cut-offs were estimated and subjective examination quality was rated. Changes in CE with time, and associations between patient factors and time to peak contrast enhancement (TPCE) were modelled with mixed effects non-linear and linear regression, respectively. RESULTS: The CE increased with increasing scan delay and reached a plateau from 120 to 210 s. The percentages of examinations achieving enhancement above cut-offs across all thresholds from 70 to 100 HU were higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no differences across scan delays for any thresholds. No patient factors showed a significant effect on TPCE. The percentage of examinations rated as acceptable was higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no statistically significant differences across scan delays. CONCLUSIONS: No patient factors were associated with TPCE in CTV. A fixed scan delay of 120–210 s yielded the best examination quality. KEY POINTS: • Contrast enhancement reached a plateau at scan delay between 90 and 120 s. • A scan delay of 120–210 s yielded the best examination quality. • No patient factors were associated with time to peak contrast enhancement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9668790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96687902022-11-18 Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality Tran, Thien Trung Kristiansen, Cathrine Helgestad Thomas, Owen Roy, Sumit Haidl, Felix Ashraf, Haseem Kløw, Nils Einar Stavem, Knut Lauritzen, Peter M. Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: Indirect computed tomography venography (CTV) is often the next imaging modality for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) when sonography is inconclusive. Our aim was to investigate the impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement (CE) and examination quality in CTV. METHODS: Patients with clinical suspicion or clinical mimics of DVT in one large hospital were enrolled. Age, sex, body weight, height, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac output were registered. CTV of the popliteal veins was obtained at 30 s intervals at 30–210 s delays. The proportions of examinations with CE exceeding predefined cut-offs were estimated and subjective examination quality was rated. Changes in CE with time, and associations between patient factors and time to peak contrast enhancement (TPCE) were modelled with mixed effects non-linear and linear regression, respectively. RESULTS: The CE increased with increasing scan delay and reached a plateau from 120 to 210 s. The percentages of examinations achieving enhancement above cut-offs across all thresholds from 70 to 100 HU were higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no differences across scan delays for any thresholds. No patient factors showed a significant effect on TPCE. The percentage of examinations rated as acceptable was higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no statistically significant differences across scan delays. CONCLUSIONS: No patient factors were associated with TPCE in CTV. A fixed scan delay of 120–210 s yielded the best examination quality. KEY POINTS: • Contrast enhancement reached a plateau at scan delay between 90 and 120 s. • A scan delay of 120–210 s yielded the best examination quality. • No patient factors were associated with time to peak contrast enhancement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9668790/ /pubmed/35554646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08841-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Computed Tomography Tran, Thien Trung Kristiansen, Cathrine Helgestad Thomas, Owen Roy, Sumit Haidl, Felix Ashraf, Haseem Kløw, Nils Einar Stavem, Knut Lauritzen, Peter M. Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality |
title | Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality |
title_full | Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality |
title_fullStr | Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality |
title_short | Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality |
title_sort | indirect ct venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality |
topic | Computed Tomography |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35554646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08841-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tranthientrung indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT kristiansencathrinehelgestad indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT thomasowen indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT roysumit indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT haidlfelix indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT ashrafhaseem indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT kløwnilseinar indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT stavemknut indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality AT lauritzenpeterm indirectctvenographyofthelowerextremitiesimpactofscandelayandpatientfactorsoncontrastenhancementandexaminationquality |