Cargando…

The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The relatively stable aquatic conditions of irrigated lowland and rainfed rice, which is grown across 145 million hectares in more than 100 countries, are capable of generating large numbers of mosquito vectors of malaria, which causes more than 400,000 deaths per year worldwide. Many methods can co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Kallista, Bottomley, Christian, Saito, Kazuki, Lines, Jo, Tusting, Lucy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24055-2
_version_ 1784831999592103936
author Chan, Kallista
Bottomley, Christian
Saito, Kazuki
Lines, Jo
Tusting, Lucy S.
author_facet Chan, Kallista
Bottomley, Christian
Saito, Kazuki
Lines, Jo
Tusting, Lucy S.
author_sort Chan, Kallista
collection PubMed
description The relatively stable aquatic conditions of irrigated lowland and rainfed rice, which is grown across 145 million hectares in more than 100 countries, are capable of generating large numbers of mosquito vectors of malaria, which causes more than 400,000 deaths per year worldwide. Many methods can control these vectors, but a systematic review has not previously been conducted. This study assesses whether larviciding, fish or intermittent irrigation can significantly reduce malaria vectors in rice fields whilst increasing rice yield. After a literature search for studies reporting the effect of larval control and rice cultivation practices on malaria vector densities in rice fields, 33 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Larviciding was effective at reducing rice-field malaria vectors. Pooled analysis of five controlled time-series (CTS) studies with chemical insecticides showed an overall combined reduction of larval densities of 77% compared to no larviciding. Eight CTSs with biological larvicides showed a pooled reduction of 60% compared to no larviciding. Cultivating rice and fish together provided good control too: a pooled analysis of three CTSs showed an overall 82% reduction in anopheline larvae compared to no fish. Pooled analysis of four studies suggested that intermittent irrigation (using various timings and frequencies of drainage) is effective at reducing the abundance of late-stage anopheline larvae (pooled reduction = − 35%), but not overall immature abundance, compared to continuous flooding. We conclude that many interventions such as larvicides, fish and intermittent irrigation can provide riceland malaria vector control, but the critical obstacle to wider use is farmer acceptability. Future research should be led by the agricultural sector, with inputs from entomologists, to investigate malaria control co-benefits within high-yielding rice cultivation practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9668837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96688372022-11-18 The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chan, Kallista Bottomley, Christian Saito, Kazuki Lines, Jo Tusting, Lucy S. Sci Rep Article The relatively stable aquatic conditions of irrigated lowland and rainfed rice, which is grown across 145 million hectares in more than 100 countries, are capable of generating large numbers of mosquito vectors of malaria, which causes more than 400,000 deaths per year worldwide. Many methods can control these vectors, but a systematic review has not previously been conducted. This study assesses whether larviciding, fish or intermittent irrigation can significantly reduce malaria vectors in rice fields whilst increasing rice yield. After a literature search for studies reporting the effect of larval control and rice cultivation practices on malaria vector densities in rice fields, 33 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Larviciding was effective at reducing rice-field malaria vectors. Pooled analysis of five controlled time-series (CTS) studies with chemical insecticides showed an overall combined reduction of larval densities of 77% compared to no larviciding. Eight CTSs with biological larvicides showed a pooled reduction of 60% compared to no larviciding. Cultivating rice and fish together provided good control too: a pooled analysis of three CTSs showed an overall 82% reduction in anopheline larvae compared to no fish. Pooled analysis of four studies suggested that intermittent irrigation (using various timings and frequencies of drainage) is effective at reducing the abundance of late-stage anopheline larvae (pooled reduction = − 35%), but not overall immature abundance, compared to continuous flooding. We conclude that many interventions such as larvicides, fish and intermittent irrigation can provide riceland malaria vector control, but the critical obstacle to wider use is farmer acceptability. Future research should be led by the agricultural sector, with inputs from entomologists, to investigate malaria control co-benefits within high-yielding rice cultivation practices. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9668837/ /pubmed/36385495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24055-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chan, Kallista
Bottomley, Christian
Saito, Kazuki
Lines, Jo
Tusting, Lucy S.
The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort control of malaria vectors in rice fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24055-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chankallista thecontrolofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bottomleychristian thecontrolofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saitokazuki thecontrolofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linesjo thecontrolofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tustinglucys thecontrolofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chankallista controlofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bottomleychristian controlofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saitokazuki controlofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linesjo controlofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tustinglucys controlofmalariavectorsinricefieldsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis