Cargando…
Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review
Heterogeneity of response to paediatric obesity interventions is one of the greatest challenges to obesity care. While evaluating school‐based interventions by mean changes compared to control is important, it does not provide an understanding of the individual variability in response to interventio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12557 |
_version_ | 1784832060028878848 |
---|---|
author | Arlinghaus, Katherine R. Cepni, Aliye B. Helbing, Rachel R. Goodman, Lenora P. Ledoux, Tracey A. Johnston, Craig A. |
author_facet | Arlinghaus, Katherine R. Cepni, Aliye B. Helbing, Rachel R. Goodman, Lenora P. Ledoux, Tracey A. Johnston, Craig A. |
author_sort | Arlinghaus, Katherine R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Heterogeneity of response to paediatric obesity interventions is one of the greatest challenges to obesity care. While evaluating school‐based interventions by mean changes compared to control is important, it does not provide an understanding of the individual variability in response to intervention. The objective of this study was to comprehensively review school‐based interventions that reported study results in terms of response and identify definitions of response used. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search of five scientific databases from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trial design, school‐based setting, weight‐based outcomes (e.g., BMI, BMI z‐score), weight‐based outcomes analysed among youth with overweight/obesity, a study conducted in a developed country and publication in English. A total of 26 reports representing 25 unique studies were included. Overall, 19% (5/26) of articles reported response. Response was defined in three ways: maintenance/decrease in BMI z‐score, decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.10, and decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.20. Few school‐based interventions identified an a priori intervention goal or identified the proportion of participants who responded to the intervention. Without such evaluation participants who do not benefit are likely to be overlooked. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9669238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96692382022-12-28 Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review Arlinghaus, Katherine R. Cepni, Aliye B. Helbing, Rachel R. Goodman, Lenora P. Ledoux, Tracey A. Johnston, Craig A. Clin Obes Review Article Heterogeneity of response to paediatric obesity interventions is one of the greatest challenges to obesity care. While evaluating school‐based interventions by mean changes compared to control is important, it does not provide an understanding of the individual variability in response to intervention. The objective of this study was to comprehensively review school‐based interventions that reported study results in terms of response and identify definitions of response used. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search of five scientific databases from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trial design, school‐based setting, weight‐based outcomes (e.g., BMI, BMI z‐score), weight‐based outcomes analysed among youth with overweight/obesity, a study conducted in a developed country and publication in English. A total of 26 reports representing 25 unique studies were included. Overall, 19% (5/26) of articles reported response. Response was defined in three ways: maintenance/decrease in BMI z‐score, decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.10, and decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.20. Few school‐based interventions identified an a priori intervention goal or identified the proportion of participants who responded to the intervention. Without such evaluation participants who do not benefit are likely to be overlooked. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-09-21 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9669238/ /pubmed/36128952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12557 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Obesity published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Arlinghaus, Katherine R. Cepni, Aliye B. Helbing, Rachel R. Goodman, Lenora P. Ledoux, Tracey A. Johnston, Craig A. Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review |
title | Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review |
title_full | Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review |
title_fullStr | Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review |
title_short | Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review |
title_sort | response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arlinghauskatheriner responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview AT cepnialiyeb responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview AT helbingrachelr responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview AT goodmanlenorap responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview AT ledouxtraceya responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview AT johnstoncraiga responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview |