Cargando…

Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review

Heterogeneity of response to paediatric obesity interventions is one of the greatest challenges to obesity care. While evaluating school‐based interventions by mean changes compared to control is important, it does not provide an understanding of the individual variability in response to interventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arlinghaus, Katherine R., Cepni, Aliye B., Helbing, Rachel R., Goodman, Lenora P., Ledoux, Tracey A., Johnston, Craig A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12557
_version_ 1784832060028878848
author Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
Cepni, Aliye B.
Helbing, Rachel R.
Goodman, Lenora P.
Ledoux, Tracey A.
Johnston, Craig A.
author_facet Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
Cepni, Aliye B.
Helbing, Rachel R.
Goodman, Lenora P.
Ledoux, Tracey A.
Johnston, Craig A.
author_sort Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
collection PubMed
description Heterogeneity of response to paediatric obesity interventions is one of the greatest challenges to obesity care. While evaluating school‐based interventions by mean changes compared to control is important, it does not provide an understanding of the individual variability in response to intervention. The objective of this study was to comprehensively review school‐based interventions that reported study results in terms of response and identify definitions of response used. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search of five scientific databases from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trial design, school‐based setting, weight‐based outcomes (e.g., BMI, BMI z‐score), weight‐based outcomes analysed among youth with overweight/obesity, a study conducted in a developed country and publication in English. A total of 26 reports representing 25 unique studies were included. Overall, 19% (5/26) of articles reported response. Response was defined in three ways: maintenance/decrease in BMI z‐score, decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.10, and decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.20. Few school‐based interventions identified an a priori intervention goal or identified the proportion of participants who responded to the intervention. Without such evaluation participants who do not benefit are likely to be overlooked.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9669238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96692382022-12-28 Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review Arlinghaus, Katherine R. Cepni, Aliye B. Helbing, Rachel R. Goodman, Lenora P. Ledoux, Tracey A. Johnston, Craig A. Clin Obes Review Article Heterogeneity of response to paediatric obesity interventions is one of the greatest challenges to obesity care. While evaluating school‐based interventions by mean changes compared to control is important, it does not provide an understanding of the individual variability in response to intervention. The objective of this study was to comprehensively review school‐based interventions that reported study results in terms of response and identify definitions of response used. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search of five scientific databases from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trial design, school‐based setting, weight‐based outcomes (e.g., BMI, BMI z‐score), weight‐based outcomes analysed among youth with overweight/obesity, a study conducted in a developed country and publication in English. A total of 26 reports representing 25 unique studies were included. Overall, 19% (5/26) of articles reported response. Response was defined in three ways: maintenance/decrease in BMI z‐score, decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.10, and decrease in BMI z‐score ≥0.20. Few school‐based interventions identified an a priori intervention goal or identified the proportion of participants who responded to the intervention. Without such evaluation participants who do not benefit are likely to be overlooked. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-09-21 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9669238/ /pubmed/36128952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12557 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Obesity published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
Cepni, Aliye B.
Helbing, Rachel R.
Goodman, Lenora P.
Ledoux, Tracey A.
Johnston, Craig A.
Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review
title Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review
title_full Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review
title_short Response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: A systematic scoping review
title_sort response to school‐based interventions for overweight and obesity: a systematic scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12557
work_keys_str_mv AT arlinghauskatheriner responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview
AT cepnialiyeb responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview
AT helbingrachelr responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview
AT goodmanlenorap responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview
AT ledouxtraceya responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview
AT johnstoncraiga responsetoschoolbasedinterventionsforoverweightandobesityasystematicscopingreview