Cargando…

Reliability of respiratory event detection with continuous positive airway pressure in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea — comparison of polysomnography with a device-based analysis

PURPOSE: Monitored polysomnography (PSG) is considered the gold standard technique to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and titrate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the accepted primary treatment method. Currently, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) considers automatic PAP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richter, Matthias, Schroeder, Maik, Domanski, Ulrike, Schwaibold, Matthias, Nilius, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-022-02740-w
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Monitored polysomnography (PSG) is considered the gold standard technique to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and titrate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the accepted primary treatment method. Currently, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) considers automatic PAP therapy initiation at home comparable to laboratory titration and recommends telemonitoring-guided interventions. Advanced CPAP devices evaluate and report the residual apnea–hypopnea index (AHI). However, in order to control the effectiveness of the prescribed therapy outside of a PSG setting, the automatic event detection must provide reliable data. METHODS: A CPAP titration was performed in the sleep laboratory by PSG in patients with OSA. The residual event indices detected by the tested device (prismaLine, Loewenstein Medical Technology) were compared to the manually scored PSG indices. Results of the device (AHI(FLOW)) were compared according to the AASM scoring criteria 1A (AHI(1A), hypopneas with a flow signal reduction of ≥ 30% with ≥ 3% oxygen reduction and/or an arousal) and 1B (AHI(1B), hypopneas with a flow signal decrease by ≥ 30% with a ≥ 4% oxygen desaturation). RESULTS: In 50 patients with OSA, the mean PSG AHI(1A) was 10.5 ± 13.8/h and the PSG AHI(1B) was 7.4 ± 12.6/h compared to a mean device AHI(Flow) of 8.4 ± 10.0/h. The correlation coefficient regarding PSG AHI(1A) and AHI(Flow) was 0.968. The correlation regarding central hypopneas on the other hand was 0.153. There were few central events to be compared in this patient group. CONCLUSION: The device-based analysis showed a high correlation in the determination of residual obstructive AHI under therapy. The recorded residual respiratory event indices in combination with the data about leakage and adherence of the studied device provide reliable information for the implementation and follow-up of CPAP therapy in a typical group of patients with OSA. Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04407949, May 29, 2020, retrospectively registered.