Cargando…

Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones

Multi-resistant pathogenic strains of non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli (NLF E. coli) are responsible for various intestinal and extraintestinal infections. Although several studies have characterised such strains using conventional methods, they have not been comprehensively studied at the ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazumder, Razib, Hussain, Arif, Phelan, Jody E., Campino, Susana, Haider, S. M. Arefeen, Mahmud, Araf, Ahmed, Dilruba, Asadulghani, Md, Clark, Taane G., Mondal, Dinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36406419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1027494
_version_ 1784832151120773120
author Mazumder, Razib
Hussain, Arif
Phelan, Jody E.
Campino, Susana
Haider, S. M. Arefeen
Mahmud, Araf
Ahmed, Dilruba
Asadulghani, Md
Clark, Taane G.
Mondal, Dinesh
author_facet Mazumder, Razib
Hussain, Arif
Phelan, Jody E.
Campino, Susana
Haider, S. M. Arefeen
Mahmud, Araf
Ahmed, Dilruba
Asadulghani, Md
Clark, Taane G.
Mondal, Dinesh
author_sort Mazumder, Razib
collection PubMed
description Multi-resistant pathogenic strains of non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli (NLF E. coli) are responsible for various intestinal and extraintestinal infections. Although several studies have characterised such strains using conventional methods, they have not been comprehensively studied at the genomic level. To address this gap, we used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) coupled with detailed microbiological and biochemical testing to investigate 17 NLF E. coli from a diagnostic centre (icddr,b) in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The prevalence of NLF E. coli was 10%, of which 47% (8/17) exhibited multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotypes. All isolates (17/17) were confirmed as E. coli and could not ferment lactose sugar. WGS data analysis revealed international high-risk clonal lineages. The most prevalent sequence types (STs) were ST131 (23%), ST1193 (18%), ST12 (18%), ST501 (12%), ST167 (6%), ST73 (6%) and ST12 (6%). Phylogenetic analysis corroborated a striking clonal population amongst the studied NLF E. coli isolates. The predominant phylogroup detected was B2 (65%). The bla(CTX-M-15) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase gene was present in 53% of isolates (9/17), whilst 64.7% (11/17) isolates were affiliated with pathogenic pathotypes. All extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli pathotypes demonstrated β-hemolysis. Our study underscores the presence of critical pathogens and MDR clones amongst non-lactose fermenting E. coli. We suggest that non-lactose fermenting E. coli be considered equally capable as lactose fermenting forms in causing intestinal and extraintestinal infections. Further, there is a need to undertake systematic, unbiased monitoring of predominant lineages amongst non-lactose fermenting E. coli that would help in better treatment and prevention strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9669651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96696512022-11-18 Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones Mazumder, Razib Hussain, Arif Phelan, Jody E. Campino, Susana Haider, S. M. Arefeen Mahmud, Araf Ahmed, Dilruba Asadulghani, Md Clark, Taane G. Mondal, Dinesh Front Microbiol Microbiology Multi-resistant pathogenic strains of non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli (NLF E. coli) are responsible for various intestinal and extraintestinal infections. Although several studies have characterised such strains using conventional methods, they have not been comprehensively studied at the genomic level. To address this gap, we used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) coupled with detailed microbiological and biochemical testing to investigate 17 NLF E. coli from a diagnostic centre (icddr,b) in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The prevalence of NLF E. coli was 10%, of which 47% (8/17) exhibited multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotypes. All isolates (17/17) were confirmed as E. coli and could not ferment lactose sugar. WGS data analysis revealed international high-risk clonal lineages. The most prevalent sequence types (STs) were ST131 (23%), ST1193 (18%), ST12 (18%), ST501 (12%), ST167 (6%), ST73 (6%) and ST12 (6%). Phylogenetic analysis corroborated a striking clonal population amongst the studied NLF E. coli isolates. The predominant phylogroup detected was B2 (65%). The bla(CTX-M-15) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase gene was present in 53% of isolates (9/17), whilst 64.7% (11/17) isolates were affiliated with pathogenic pathotypes. All extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli pathotypes demonstrated β-hemolysis. Our study underscores the presence of critical pathogens and MDR clones amongst non-lactose fermenting E. coli. We suggest that non-lactose fermenting E. coli be considered equally capable as lactose fermenting forms in causing intestinal and extraintestinal infections. Further, there is a need to undertake systematic, unbiased monitoring of predominant lineages amongst non-lactose fermenting E. coli that would help in better treatment and prevention strategies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9669651/ /pubmed/36406419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1027494 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mazumder, Hussain, Phelan, Campino, Haider, Mahmud, Ahmed, Asadulghani, Clark and Mondal. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Mazumder, Razib
Hussain, Arif
Phelan, Jody E.
Campino, Susana
Haider, S. M. Arefeen
Mahmud, Araf
Ahmed, Dilruba
Asadulghani, Md
Clark, Taane G.
Mondal, Dinesh
Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones
title Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones
title_full Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones
title_fullStr Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones
title_full_unstemmed Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones
title_short Non-lactose fermenting Escherichia coli: Following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting E. coli high-risk clones
title_sort non-lactose fermenting escherichia coli: following in the footsteps of lactose fermenting e. coli high-risk clones
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36406419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1027494
work_keys_str_mv AT mazumderrazib nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT hussainarif nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT phelanjodye nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT campinosusana nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT haidersmarefeen nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT mahmudaraf nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT ahmeddilruba nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT asadulghanimd nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT clarktaaneg nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones
AT mondaldinesh nonlactosefermentingescherichiacolifollowinginthefootstepsoflactosefermentingecolihighriskclones