Cargando…
Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expecta...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.13 |
_version_ | 1784832206390165504 |
---|---|
author | Bhatia, Kriti Löwenkamp, Christian Franz, Volker H. |
author_facet | Bhatia, Kriti Löwenkamp, Christian Franz, Volker H. |
author_sort | Bhatia, Kriti |
collection | PubMed |
description | Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expectation: When repeatedly grasping large objects, the variability is similar to that when grasping small objects. Based on this result, it was often concluded that grasping violated Weber's law. This astonishing finding generated a flurry of research, with contradictory results and potentially far-reaching implications for theorizing about the functional architecture of the brain. We show that previous studies ignored nonlinearities in the scaling of the grasping response. These nonlinearities result from, for example, the finger span being limited such that the opening of the fingers reaches a ceiling for large objects. We describe how to mathematically take these nonlinearities into account and apply this approach to our own data, as well as to the data of three influential studies on this topic. In all four datasets, we found that—when appropriately estimated—JNDs increase with object size, as expected by Weber's law. We conclude that grasping obeys Weber's law, as do essentially all sensory dimensions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9669808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96698082022-11-18 Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND Bhatia, Kriti Löwenkamp, Christian Franz, Volker H. J Vis Article Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expectation: When repeatedly grasping large objects, the variability is similar to that when grasping small objects. Based on this result, it was often concluded that grasping violated Weber's law. This astonishing finding generated a flurry of research, with contradictory results and potentially far-reaching implications for theorizing about the functional architecture of the brain. We show that previous studies ignored nonlinearities in the scaling of the grasping response. These nonlinearities result from, for example, the finger span being limited such that the opening of the fingers reaches a ceiling for large objects. We describe how to mathematically take these nonlinearities into account and apply this approach to our own data, as well as to the data of three influential studies on this topic. In all four datasets, we found that—when appropriately estimated—JNDs increase with object size, as expected by Weber's law. We conclude that grasping obeys Weber's law, as do essentially all sensory dimensions. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9669808/ /pubmed/36374493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.13 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Bhatia, Kriti Löwenkamp, Christian Franz, Volker H. Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND |
title | Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND |
title_full | Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND |
title_fullStr | Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND |
title_full_unstemmed | Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND |
title_short | Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND |
title_sort | grasping follows weber's law: how to use response variability as a proxy for jnd |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhatiakriti graspingfollowsweberslawhowtouseresponsevariabilityasaproxyforjnd AT lowenkampchristian graspingfollowsweberslawhowtouseresponsevariabilityasaproxyforjnd AT franzvolkerh graspingfollowsweberslawhowtouseresponsevariabilityasaproxyforjnd |