Cargando…

Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND

Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expecta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatia, Kriti, Löwenkamp, Christian, Franz, Volker H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.13
_version_ 1784832206390165504
author Bhatia, Kriti
Löwenkamp, Christian
Franz, Volker H.
author_facet Bhatia, Kriti
Löwenkamp, Christian
Franz, Volker H.
author_sort Bhatia, Kriti
collection PubMed
description Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expectation: When repeatedly grasping large objects, the variability is similar to that when grasping small objects. Based on this result, it was often concluded that grasping violated Weber's law. This astonishing finding generated a flurry of research, with contradictory results and potentially far-reaching implications for theorizing about the functional architecture of the brain. We show that previous studies ignored nonlinearities in the scaling of the grasping response. These nonlinearities result from, for example, the finger span being limited such that the opening of the fingers reaches a ceiling for large objects. We describe how to mathematically take these nonlinearities into account and apply this approach to our own data, as well as to the data of three influential studies on this topic. In all four datasets, we found that—when appropriately estimated—JNDs increase with object size, as expected by Weber's law. We conclude that grasping obeys Weber's law, as do essentially all sensory dimensions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9669808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96698082022-11-18 Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND Bhatia, Kriti Löwenkamp, Christian Franz, Volker H. J Vis Article Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expectation: When repeatedly grasping large objects, the variability is similar to that when grasping small objects. Based on this result, it was often concluded that grasping violated Weber's law. This astonishing finding generated a flurry of research, with contradictory results and potentially far-reaching implications for theorizing about the functional architecture of the brain. We show that previous studies ignored nonlinearities in the scaling of the grasping response. These nonlinearities result from, for example, the finger span being limited such that the opening of the fingers reaches a ceiling for large objects. We describe how to mathematically take these nonlinearities into account and apply this approach to our own data, as well as to the data of three influential studies on this topic. In all four datasets, we found that—when appropriately estimated—JNDs increase with object size, as expected by Weber's law. We conclude that grasping obeys Weber's law, as do essentially all sensory dimensions. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9669808/ /pubmed/36374493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.13 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Bhatia, Kriti
Löwenkamp, Christian
Franz, Volker H.
Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
title Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
title_full Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
title_fullStr Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
title_full_unstemmed Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
title_short Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
title_sort grasping follows weber's law: how to use response variability as a proxy for jnd
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.13
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatiakriti graspingfollowsweberslawhowtouseresponsevariabilityasaproxyforjnd
AT lowenkampchristian graspingfollowsweberslawhowtouseresponsevariabilityasaproxyforjnd
AT franzvolkerh graspingfollowsweberslawhowtouseresponsevariabilityasaproxyforjnd