Cargando…
Development and validation of novel nomograms to predict survival of patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma
BACKGROUND: There is no unified standard to predict postoperative survival in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC), hence the urgency to develop a model to accurately predict the prognosis of these patients. AIM: To develop and validate nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405263 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11726 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: There is no unified standard to predict postoperative survival in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC), hence the urgency to develop a model to accurately predict the prognosis of these patients. AIM: To develop and validate nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with TSCC. METHODS: A cohort of 3454 patients with TSCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to develop nomograms; another independent cohort of 203 patients with TSCC from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, was used for external validation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify useful variables for the development of nomograms. The calibration curve, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis, concordance index (C-index), net reclassification index (NRI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the calibration, discrimination ability, and clinical utility of the nomograms. RESULTS: Eight variables were selected and used to develop nomograms for patients with TSCC. The C-index (0.741 and 0.757 for OS and CSS in the training cohort and 0.800 and 0.830 in the validation cohort, respectively) and AUC indicated that the discrimination abilities of these nomograms were acceptable. The calibration curves of OS and CSS indicated that the predicted and actual values were consistent in both the training and validation cohorts. The NRI values (training cohort: 0.493 and 0.482 for 3- and 5-year OS and 0.424 and 0.402 for 3- and 5-year CSS; validation cohort: 0.635 and 0.750 for 3- and 5-year OS and 0.354 and 0.608 for 3- and 5-year CSS, respectively) and DCA results indicated that the nomograms were significantly better than the tumor-node-metastasis staging system in predicting the prognosis of patients with TSCC. CONCLUSION: Our nomograms can accurately predict patient prognoses and assist clinicians in improving decision-making concerning patients with TSCC in clinical practice. |
---|