Cargando…
Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
OBJECTIVE: To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context. DESIGN: Realist review SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650 |
_version_ | 1784832265810870272 |
---|---|
author | Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Norman, Wendy V Lewandowska, Maria Meiksin, Rebecca Palmer, Melissa J Scott, Rachel French, Rebecca Wellings, Kaye Ivory, Alice Wong, Geoff |
author_facet | Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Norman, Wendy V Lewandowska, Maria Meiksin, Rebecca Palmer, Melissa J Scott, Rachel French, Rebecca Wellings, Kaye Ivory, Alice Wong, Geoff |
author_sort | Baraitser, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context. DESIGN: Realist review SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants included people seeking or having had an abortion. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions and new models of abortion care relevant to the UK. OUTCOME MEASURES: Causal explanations, in the form of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, to test and develop our realist programme theory. RESULTS: We identified 12 401 abstracts, selecting 944 for full text assessment. Our final review included 50 papers. Medical abortion at home is safe, effective and acceptable to most, but clinical pathways and user experience are variable and a minority would not choose this method again. Having a choice of abortion location remains essential, as some people are unable to have a medical abortion at home. Choice of place of abortion (home or clinical setting) was influenced by service factors (appointment number, timing and wait-times), personal responsibilities (caring/work commitments), geography (travel time/distance), relationships (need for secrecy) and desire for awareness/involvement in the process. We found experiences could be improved by offering: an option for self-referral through a telemedicine consultation, realistic information on a range of experiences, opportunities to personalise the process, improved pain relief, and choice of when and how to discuss contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the work done by patients when moving medical abortion care from clinic to home is important. Patients may benefit from support to: prepare a space, manage privacy and work/caring obligations, decide when/how to take medications, understand what is normal, assess experience and decide when and how to ask for help. The transition of this complex intervention when delivered outside healthcare environments could be supported by strategies that reduce surprise or anxiety, enabling preparation and a sense of control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9670095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96700952022-11-17 Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Norman, Wendy V Lewandowska, Maria Meiksin, Rebecca Palmer, Melissa J Scott, Rachel French, Rebecca Wellings, Kaye Ivory, Alice Wong, Geoff BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine OBJECTIVE: To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context. DESIGN: Realist review SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants included people seeking or having had an abortion. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions and new models of abortion care relevant to the UK. OUTCOME MEASURES: Causal explanations, in the form of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, to test and develop our realist programme theory. RESULTS: We identified 12 401 abstracts, selecting 944 for full text assessment. Our final review included 50 papers. Medical abortion at home is safe, effective and acceptable to most, but clinical pathways and user experience are variable and a minority would not choose this method again. Having a choice of abortion location remains essential, as some people are unable to have a medical abortion at home. Choice of place of abortion (home or clinical setting) was influenced by service factors (appointment number, timing and wait-times), personal responsibilities (caring/work commitments), geography (travel time/distance), relationships (need for secrecy) and desire for awareness/involvement in the process. We found experiences could be improved by offering: an option for self-referral through a telemedicine consultation, realistic information on a range of experiences, opportunities to personalise the process, improved pain relief, and choice of when and how to discuss contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the work done by patients when moving medical abortion care from clinic to home is important. Patients may benefit from support to: prepare a space, manage privacy and work/caring obligations, decide when/how to take medications, understand what is normal, assess experience and decide when and how to ask for help. The transition of this complex intervention when delivered outside healthcare environments could be supported by strategies that reduce surprise or anxiety, enabling preparation and a sense of control. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9670095/ /pubmed/36385017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Medicine Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Norman, Wendy V Lewandowska, Maria Meiksin, Rebecca Palmer, Melissa J Scott, Rachel French, Rebecca Wellings, Kaye Ivory, Alice Wong, Geoff Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review |
title | Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review |
title_full | Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review |
title_fullStr | Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review |
title_short | Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review |
title_sort | improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review |
topic | Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baraitserpaula improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT freecaroline improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT normanwendyv improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT lewandowskamaria improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT meiksinrebecca improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT palmermelissaj improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT scottrachel improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT frenchrebecca improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT wellingskaye improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT ivoryalice improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT wonggeoff improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview AT improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview |