Cargando…

Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review

OBJECTIVE: To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context. DESIGN: Realist review SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baraitser, Paula, Free, Caroline, Norman, Wendy V, Lewandowska, Maria, Meiksin, Rebecca, Palmer, Melissa J, Scott, Rachel, French, Rebecca, Wellings, Kaye, Ivory, Alice, Wong, Geoff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650
_version_ 1784832265810870272
author Baraitser, Paula
Free, Caroline
Norman, Wendy V
Lewandowska, Maria
Meiksin, Rebecca
Palmer, Melissa J
Scott, Rachel
French, Rebecca
Wellings, Kaye
Ivory, Alice
Wong, Geoff
author_facet Baraitser, Paula
Free, Caroline
Norman, Wendy V
Lewandowska, Maria
Meiksin, Rebecca
Palmer, Melissa J
Scott, Rachel
French, Rebecca
Wellings, Kaye
Ivory, Alice
Wong, Geoff
author_sort Baraitser, Paula
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context. DESIGN: Realist review SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants included people seeking or having had an abortion. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions and new models of abortion care relevant to the UK. OUTCOME MEASURES: Causal explanations, in the form of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, to test and develop our realist programme theory. RESULTS: We identified 12 401 abstracts, selecting 944 for full text assessment. Our final review included 50 papers. Medical abortion at home is safe, effective and acceptable to most, but clinical pathways and user experience are variable and a minority would not choose this method again. Having a choice of abortion location remains essential, as some people are unable to have a medical abortion at home. Choice of place of abortion (home or clinical setting) was influenced by service factors (appointment number, timing and wait-times), personal responsibilities (caring/work commitments), geography (travel time/distance), relationships (need for secrecy) and desire for awareness/involvement in the process. We found experiences could be improved by offering: an option for self-referral through a telemedicine consultation, realistic information on a range of experiences, opportunities to personalise the process, improved pain relief, and choice of when and how to discuss contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the work done by patients when moving medical abortion care from clinic to home is important. Patients may benefit from support to: prepare a space, manage privacy and work/caring obligations, decide when/how to take medications, understand what is normal, assess experience and decide when and how to ask for help. The transition of this complex intervention when delivered outside healthcare environments could be supported by strategies that reduce surprise or anxiety, enabling preparation and a sense of control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9670095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96700952022-11-17 Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Norman, Wendy V Lewandowska, Maria Meiksin, Rebecca Palmer, Melissa J Scott, Rachel French, Rebecca Wellings, Kaye Ivory, Alice Wong, Geoff BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine OBJECTIVE: To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context. DESIGN: Realist review SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants included people seeking or having had an abortion. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions and new models of abortion care relevant to the UK. OUTCOME MEASURES: Causal explanations, in the form of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, to test and develop our realist programme theory. RESULTS: We identified 12 401 abstracts, selecting 944 for full text assessment. Our final review included 50 papers. Medical abortion at home is safe, effective and acceptable to most, but clinical pathways and user experience are variable and a minority would not choose this method again. Having a choice of abortion location remains essential, as some people are unable to have a medical abortion at home. Choice of place of abortion (home or clinical setting) was influenced by service factors (appointment number, timing and wait-times), personal responsibilities (caring/work commitments), geography (travel time/distance), relationships (need for secrecy) and desire for awareness/involvement in the process. We found experiences could be improved by offering: an option for self-referral through a telemedicine consultation, realistic information on a range of experiences, opportunities to personalise the process, improved pain relief, and choice of when and how to discuss contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the work done by patients when moving medical abortion care from clinic to home is important. Patients may benefit from support to: prepare a space, manage privacy and work/caring obligations, decide when/how to take medications, understand what is normal, assess experience and decide when and how to ask for help. The transition of this complex intervention when delivered outside healthcare environments could be supported by strategies that reduce surprise or anxiety, enabling preparation and a sense of control. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9670095/ /pubmed/36385017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Reproductive Medicine
Baraitser, Paula
Free, Caroline
Norman, Wendy V
Lewandowska, Maria
Meiksin, Rebecca
Palmer, Melissa J
Scott, Rachel
French, Rebecca
Wellings, Kaye
Ivory, Alice
Wong, Geoff
Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
title Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
title_full Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
title_fullStr Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
title_full_unstemmed Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
title_short Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
title_sort improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review
topic Reproductive Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650
work_keys_str_mv AT baraitserpaula improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT freecaroline improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT normanwendyv improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT lewandowskamaria improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT meiksinrebecca improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT palmermelissaj improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT scottrachel improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT frenchrebecca improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT wellingskaye improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT ivoryalice improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT wonggeoff improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview
AT improvingexperienceofmedicalabortionathomeinachangingtherapeutictechnologicalandregulatorylandscapearealistreview