Cargando…
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened
INTRODUCTION: There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244376 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127 |
_version_ | 1784832315078213632 |
---|---|
author | Güney, Mehmet Raşit Güler, Erhan Albay, Erkan Kehlibar, Tamer Yilmaz, Mehmet Ketenci, Bülend |
author_facet | Güney, Mehmet Raşit Güler, Erhan Albay, Erkan Kehlibar, Tamer Yilmaz, Mehmet Ketenci, Bülend |
author_sort | Güney, Mehmet Raşit |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. RESULTS: In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34(th) month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9670345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96703452022-11-21 Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened Güney, Mehmet Raşit Güler, Erhan Albay, Erkan Kehlibar, Tamer Yilmaz, Mehmet Ketenci, Bülend Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. RESULTS: In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34(th) month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9670345/ /pubmed/35244376 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Güney, Mehmet Raşit Güler, Erhan Albay, Erkan Kehlibar, Tamer Yilmaz, Mehmet Ketenci, Bülend Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
title | Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What
Happened |
title_full | Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What
Happened |
title_fullStr | Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What
Happened |
title_full_unstemmed | Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What
Happened |
title_short | Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What
Happened |
title_sort | coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease: what we did, what
happened |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244376 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guneymehmetrasit coexistingcoronaryandcarotidarterydiseasewhatwedidwhathappened AT gulererhan coexistingcoronaryandcarotidarterydiseasewhatwedidwhathappened AT albayerkan coexistingcoronaryandcarotidarterydiseasewhatwedidwhathappened AT kehlibartamer coexistingcoronaryandcarotidarterydiseasewhatwedidwhathappened AT yilmazmehmet coexistingcoronaryandcarotidarterydiseasewhatwedidwhathappened AT ketencibulend coexistingcoronaryandcarotidarterydiseasewhatwedidwhathappened |