Cargando…
Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation is the recommended treatment method for patients with advanced heart failure that is refractory to clinical treatment. Due to the progressive severity of these patients and the impossibility of performing the transplant in a short term, there are mechanical circul...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895989 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562 |
_version_ | 1784832317100916736 |
---|---|
author | Hette, Adriana Natucci Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto |
author_facet | Hette, Adriana Natucci Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto |
author_sort | Hette, Adriana Natucci |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation is the recommended treatment method for patients with advanced heart failure that is refractory to clinical treatment. Due to the progressive severity of these patients and the impossibility of performing the transplant in a short term, there are mechanical circulatory assist devices that can offer necessary hemodynamic support and clinical stability in the period preceding the heart transplant surgery. The present study aims to address and describe the main devices used as bridges for heart transplantation, as well as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: This work is a literature review, developed with scientific production in the period from 2010 to 2020, that focus on circulatory assist devices as a bridge for heart transplantation. RESULTS: These devices are characterized as a bridge for transplantation. Short-term or temporary devices are those used for hemodynamic support to stabilize the individual clinically in the presence of refractory cardiogenic shock. And long-term devices are indicated for stable patients with long-term strategic planning. CONCLUSION: According to the present study, it is possible to observe that there is a wide variety of devices available on the market, enabling the most appropriate choice according to the patient’s need. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9670353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96703532022-11-21 Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation? Hette, Adriana Natucci Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Review Article INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation is the recommended treatment method for patients with advanced heart failure that is refractory to clinical treatment. Due to the progressive severity of these patients and the impossibility of performing the transplant in a short term, there are mechanical circulatory assist devices that can offer necessary hemodynamic support and clinical stability in the period preceding the heart transplant surgery. The present study aims to address and describe the main devices used as bridges for heart transplantation, as well as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: This work is a literature review, developed with scientific production in the period from 2010 to 2020, that focus on circulatory assist devices as a bridge for heart transplantation. RESULTS: These devices are characterized as a bridge for transplantation. Short-term or temporary devices are those used for hemodynamic support to stabilize the individual clinically in the presence of refractory cardiogenic shock. And long-term devices are indicated for stable patients with long-term strategic planning. CONCLUSION: According to the present study, it is possible to observe that there is a wide variety of devices available on the market, enabling the most appropriate choice according to the patient’s need. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9670353/ /pubmed/35895989 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hette, Adriana Natucci Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation? |
title | Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as
Bridge to Heart Transplantation? |
title_full | Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as
Bridge to Heart Transplantation? |
title_fullStr | Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as
Bridge to Heart Transplantation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as
Bridge to Heart Transplantation? |
title_short | Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as
Bridge to Heart Transplantation? |
title_sort | mechanical circulatory assist devices: which is the best device as
bridge to heart transplantation? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895989 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hetteadriananatucci mechanicalcirculatoryassistdeviceswhichisthebestdeviceasbridgetohearttransplantation AT sobralmarceloluizpeixoto mechanicalcirculatoryassistdeviceswhichisthebestdeviceasbridgetohearttransplantation |