Cargando…

Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation is the recommended treatment method for patients with advanced heart failure that is refractory to clinical treatment. Due to the progressive severity of these patients and the impossibility of performing the transplant in a short term, there are mechanical circul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hette, Adriana Natucci, Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895989
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562
_version_ 1784832317100916736
author Hette, Adriana Natucci
Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto
author_facet Hette, Adriana Natucci
Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto
author_sort Hette, Adriana Natucci
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation is the recommended treatment method for patients with advanced heart failure that is refractory to clinical treatment. Due to the progressive severity of these patients and the impossibility of performing the transplant in a short term, there are mechanical circulatory assist devices that can offer necessary hemodynamic support and clinical stability in the period preceding the heart transplant surgery. The present study aims to address and describe the main devices used as bridges for heart transplantation, as well as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: This work is a literature review, developed with scientific production in the period from 2010 to 2020, that focus on circulatory assist devices as a bridge for heart transplantation. RESULTS: These devices are characterized as a bridge for transplantation. Short-term or temporary devices are those used for hemodynamic support to stabilize the individual clinically in the presence of refractory cardiogenic shock. And long-term devices are indicated for stable patients with long-term strategic planning. CONCLUSION: According to the present study, it is possible to observe that there is a wide variety of devices available on the market, enabling the most appropriate choice according to the patient’s need.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9670353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96703532022-11-21 Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation? Hette, Adriana Natucci Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Review Article INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation is the recommended treatment method for patients with advanced heart failure that is refractory to clinical treatment. Due to the progressive severity of these patients and the impossibility of performing the transplant in a short term, there are mechanical circulatory assist devices that can offer necessary hemodynamic support and clinical stability in the period preceding the heart transplant surgery. The present study aims to address and describe the main devices used as bridges for heart transplantation, as well as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: This work is a literature review, developed with scientific production in the period from 2010 to 2020, that focus on circulatory assist devices as a bridge for heart transplantation. RESULTS: These devices are characterized as a bridge for transplantation. Short-term or temporary devices are those used for hemodynamic support to stabilize the individual clinically in the presence of refractory cardiogenic shock. And long-term devices are indicated for stable patients with long-term strategic planning. CONCLUSION: According to the present study, it is possible to observe that there is a wide variety of devices available on the market, enabling the most appropriate choice according to the patient’s need. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9670353/ /pubmed/35895989 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hette, Adriana Natucci
Sobral, Marcelo Luiz Peixoto
Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
title Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
title_full Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
title_fullStr Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
title_short Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
title_sort mechanical circulatory assist devices: which is the best device as bridge to heart transplantation?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895989
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562
work_keys_str_mv AT hetteadriananatucci mechanicalcirculatoryassistdeviceswhichisthebestdeviceasbridgetohearttransplantation
AT sobralmarceloluizpeixoto mechanicalcirculatoryassistdeviceswhichisthebestdeviceasbridgetohearttransplantation