Cargando…

Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis

BACKGROUND: Present studies on the efficacy and safety of curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with esophageal cancer reflect heterogenous results especially in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of CRT in patients ≥ 65 years. In a cohort, the focus ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linde, Philipp, Mallmann, Markus, Adams, Anne, Wegen, Simone, Rosenbrock, Johannes, Trommer, Maike, Marnitz, Simone, Baues, Christian, Celik, Eren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02160-w
_version_ 1784832346324729856
author Linde, Philipp
Mallmann, Markus
Adams, Anne
Wegen, Simone
Rosenbrock, Johannes
Trommer, Maike
Marnitz, Simone
Baues, Christian
Celik, Eren
author_facet Linde, Philipp
Mallmann, Markus
Adams, Anne
Wegen, Simone
Rosenbrock, Johannes
Trommer, Maike
Marnitz, Simone
Baues, Christian
Celik, Eren
author_sort Linde, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Present studies on the efficacy and safety of curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with esophageal cancer reflect heterogenous results especially in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of CRT in patients ≥ 65 years. In a cohort, the focus centered around treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE Grade > 3), overall survival as well as progression free survival, comparing these rates in-between patients older than 70 years to those younger than 70 years. METHODS: A total of 67 patients older than 65 years (34 (50.7%) were older than 70 years) met the inclusion criteria for retrospective analysis (period from January 2013 to October 2017). Treatment consisted of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin with the intention of neoadjuvant or definite chemoradiation. A sum of 67 patients received CRT (44 (65.6%) patients in neoadjuvant, 23 (34.4%) in definite intent). Of these, 22 and 12 patients were older than 70 years (50% and 52.2% in both treatment groups, respectively). Median age was 71 years and patients had a good physical performance status (ECOG 0: 57.6%, ECOG 1: 27.3%). Median follow-up was 24 months. Most patients had advanced tumour stages (T3 stage: n = 51, 79.7%) and nodal metastasis (N1 stage: n = 54, 88.5%). A subgroup comparison was conducted between patients aged ≤ 70 years and > 70 years. RESULTS: In severe (CTCAE Grade 3–5) toxicities (acute and late), no significant differences were observed between both patient groups (< 70 years vs. > 70 years). 21% had acute grade 3 events, 4 patients (4%) had grade 4 events, and two patients (3%) had one grade 5 event. Late toxicity after CRT was grade 1 in 13 patients (22%), grade 2 in two (3%), grade 3 in two (3%), grade 4 in four (7%), and grade 5 in one (2%). Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 30 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months. No significant differences were seen for OS (32 months vs. 25 months; p = 0.632) and PFS (16 months vs. 12 months; p = 0.696) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger ones. Trimodal therapy significantly prolonged both OS and PFS (p = 0.005; p = 0.018), regardless of age. CONCLUSION: CRT in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer is feasible and effective. Numbers for acute and late toxicities can be compared to cohorts of younger patients (< 65 years) with EC who received the same therapies. Age at treatment initiation alone should not be the determining factor. Instead, functional status, risk of treatment-related morbidities, life expectancy and patient´s preferences should factor into the choice of therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9670495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96704952022-11-18 Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis Linde, Philipp Mallmann, Markus Adams, Anne Wegen, Simone Rosenbrock, Johannes Trommer, Maike Marnitz, Simone Baues, Christian Celik, Eren Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Present studies on the efficacy and safety of curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with esophageal cancer reflect heterogenous results especially in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of CRT in patients ≥ 65 years. In a cohort, the focus centered around treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE Grade > 3), overall survival as well as progression free survival, comparing these rates in-between patients older than 70 years to those younger than 70 years. METHODS: A total of 67 patients older than 65 years (34 (50.7%) were older than 70 years) met the inclusion criteria for retrospective analysis (period from January 2013 to October 2017). Treatment consisted of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin with the intention of neoadjuvant or definite chemoradiation. A sum of 67 patients received CRT (44 (65.6%) patients in neoadjuvant, 23 (34.4%) in definite intent). Of these, 22 and 12 patients were older than 70 years (50% and 52.2% in both treatment groups, respectively). Median age was 71 years and patients had a good physical performance status (ECOG 0: 57.6%, ECOG 1: 27.3%). Median follow-up was 24 months. Most patients had advanced tumour stages (T3 stage: n = 51, 79.7%) and nodal metastasis (N1 stage: n = 54, 88.5%). A subgroup comparison was conducted between patients aged ≤ 70 years and > 70 years. RESULTS: In severe (CTCAE Grade 3–5) toxicities (acute and late), no significant differences were observed between both patient groups (< 70 years vs. > 70 years). 21% had acute grade 3 events, 4 patients (4%) had grade 4 events, and two patients (3%) had one grade 5 event. Late toxicity after CRT was grade 1 in 13 patients (22%), grade 2 in two (3%), grade 3 in two (3%), grade 4 in four (7%), and grade 5 in one (2%). Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 30 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months. No significant differences were seen for OS (32 months vs. 25 months; p = 0.632) and PFS (16 months vs. 12 months; p = 0.696) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger ones. Trimodal therapy significantly prolonged both OS and PFS (p = 0.005; p = 0.018), regardless of age. CONCLUSION: CRT in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer is feasible and effective. Numbers for acute and late toxicities can be compared to cohorts of younger patients (< 65 years) with EC who received the same therapies. Age at treatment initiation alone should not be the determining factor. Instead, functional status, risk of treatment-related morbidities, life expectancy and patient´s preferences should factor into the choice of therapy. BioMed Central 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9670495/ /pubmed/36397163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02160-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Linde, Philipp
Mallmann, Markus
Adams, Anne
Wegen, Simone
Rosenbrock, Johannes
Trommer, Maike
Marnitz, Simone
Baues, Christian
Celik, Eren
Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis
title Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis
title_full Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis
title_fullStr Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis
title_full_unstemmed Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis
title_short Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis
title_sort chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02160-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lindephilipp chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT mallmannmarkus chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT adamsanne chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT wegensimone chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT rosenbrockjohannes chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT trommermaike chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT marnitzsimone chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT baueschristian chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT celikeren chemoradiationforelderlypatients65yearswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis