Cargando…

Examining how and why polygenic dopamine composite levels moderate adolescents’ vulnerability to peer victimization

Extensive literature documents that dopaminergic genes play an important role in the link between adverse environments and adolescents’ problem behavior. However, little is known about the potential mechanism underlying adolescents’ vulnerability to peer victimization. The current study examined the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Yemiao, Xiong, Yuke, Liu, Xia, Liu, Jinmeng, Li, Jinwen, Wang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-022-00521-7
Descripción
Sumario:Extensive literature documents that dopaminergic genes play an important role in the link between adverse environments and adolescents’ problem behavior. However, little is known about the potential mechanism underlying adolescents’ vulnerability to peer victimization. The current study examined the effect of the interplay between a polygenic dopamine composite (i.e., COMT Val158Met and DRD2-141C Ins/Del polymorphisms) and peer victimization on adolescents’ externalizing problems as well as the mediating role of emotion dysregulation in the interactive effects in a sample of 393 Chinese adolescents (Mean age = 14.71 years; 50.1% girls). A significant moderation of dopaminergic genetic composite was observed in girls but not in boys. In addition, emotion dysregulation partially explained the moderating effect of dopaminergic genes. Specifically, girls with genic composite indexing low dopamine activity reported a higher level of emotion dysregulation when faced with more peer victimization. More difficulties with emotion regulation, in turn, predicted more pronounced externalizing problems in girls. This study underscores polygenic underpinnings of adolescent vulnerability to negative peer experiences and suggests the importance of considering sex differences when investigating genic influence on the relationship between adverse environments and externalizing problems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13034-022-00521-7.