Cargando…

Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center

BACKGROUND: To investigate the therapeutic effects and safety of low-dose and standard-dose rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: In this real-world study, we included 22 consecutive patients with APS who received RTX. Standard dose (SD) was defined as an over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gan, Yuzhou, Zhong, Xue, Zhao, Yawei, Li, Gongming, Ye, Hua, Li, Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971366
_version_ 1784832410904428544
author Gan, Yuzhou
Zhong, Xue
Zhao, Yawei
Li, Gongming
Ye, Hua
Li, Chun
author_facet Gan, Yuzhou
Zhong, Xue
Zhao, Yawei
Li, Gongming
Ye, Hua
Li, Chun
author_sort Gan, Yuzhou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the therapeutic effects and safety of low-dose and standard-dose rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: In this real-world study, we included 22 consecutive patients with APS who received RTX. Standard dose (SD) was defined as an overall dosage of RTX ≥ 1000mg in the induction period, and low dose (LD) was defined as an overall dosage of RTX <1000mg. RESULTS: Of included patients, 1 patients died, 2 patients withdrew and 19 patients completed 6-month follow-up. Nine patients received SD-RTX and 13 patients received LD-RTX, and elder patients [LD-RTX vs. SD-RTX: (49.1 ± 15.5) vs. (35.8 ± 12.3) years, p = 0.044] and patients with later-onset [LD-RTX vs. SD-RTX: (46.8 ± 16.3) vs. (31.3 ± 13.6) years, p = 0.029] were more frequently included in LD-RTX than SD-RTX. Following 6 month RTX treatment, 8 patients (42.1%) achieved complete remission, 8 patients (42.1%) achieved partial remission and 3 patients (15.8%) showed no remission. The titers of anticardiolipin antibodies [baseline vs. 6 months: 30.8 (10.7, 90) vs. 19.5 (2.45, 69.10) U/L, p = 0.023] and the levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [baseline vs. 6 months: 29 (6, 63) vs. '6 (3, 14) mm/h, p = 0.021] exhibited a significantly decrease in all APS patients. Remission rate and titers of anti-β2-glycoprotein I and lupus anticoagulant did not differ significantly between two groups. CONCLUSION: RTX might be a safe and effective option for patients with APS, and low dose confers equal efficacy as standard dose. Further cohort studies are needed to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9670802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96708022022-11-18 Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center Gan, Yuzhou Zhong, Xue Zhao, Yawei Li, Gongming Ye, Hua Li, Chun Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: To investigate the therapeutic effects and safety of low-dose and standard-dose rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: In this real-world study, we included 22 consecutive patients with APS who received RTX. Standard dose (SD) was defined as an overall dosage of RTX ≥ 1000mg in the induction period, and low dose (LD) was defined as an overall dosage of RTX <1000mg. RESULTS: Of included patients, 1 patients died, 2 patients withdrew and 19 patients completed 6-month follow-up. Nine patients received SD-RTX and 13 patients received LD-RTX, and elder patients [LD-RTX vs. SD-RTX: (49.1 ± 15.5) vs. (35.8 ± 12.3) years, p = 0.044] and patients with later-onset [LD-RTX vs. SD-RTX: (46.8 ± 16.3) vs. (31.3 ± 13.6) years, p = 0.029] were more frequently included in LD-RTX than SD-RTX. Following 6 month RTX treatment, 8 patients (42.1%) achieved complete remission, 8 patients (42.1%) achieved partial remission and 3 patients (15.8%) showed no remission. The titers of anticardiolipin antibodies [baseline vs. 6 months: 30.8 (10.7, 90) vs. 19.5 (2.45, 69.10) U/L, p = 0.023] and the levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [baseline vs. 6 months: 29 (6, 63) vs. '6 (3, 14) mm/h, p = 0.021] exhibited a significantly decrease in all APS patients. Remission rate and titers of anti-β2-glycoprotein I and lupus anticoagulant did not differ significantly between two groups. CONCLUSION: RTX might be a safe and effective option for patients with APS, and low dose confers equal efficacy as standard dose. Further cohort studies are needed to confirm our findings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9670802/ /pubmed/36405743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971366 Text en Copyright © 2022 Gan, Zhong, Zhao, Li, Ye and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Gan, Yuzhou
Zhong, Xue
Zhao, Yawei
Li, Gongming
Ye, Hua
Li, Chun
Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center
title Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center
title_full Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center
title_fullStr Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center
title_full_unstemmed Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center
title_short Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center
title_sort low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: a pilot study from a tertiary medical center
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971366
work_keys_str_mv AT ganyuzhou lowdoseversusstandarddoserituximabforthetreatmentofantiphospholipidsyndromeapilotstudyfromatertiarymedicalcenter
AT zhongxue lowdoseversusstandarddoserituximabforthetreatmentofantiphospholipidsyndromeapilotstudyfromatertiarymedicalcenter
AT zhaoyawei lowdoseversusstandarddoserituximabforthetreatmentofantiphospholipidsyndromeapilotstudyfromatertiarymedicalcenter
AT ligongming lowdoseversusstandarddoserituximabforthetreatmentofantiphospholipidsyndromeapilotstudyfromatertiarymedicalcenter
AT yehua lowdoseversusstandarddoserituximabforthetreatmentofantiphospholipidsyndromeapilotstudyfromatertiarymedicalcenter
AT lichun lowdoseversusstandarddoserituximabforthetreatmentofantiphospholipidsyndromeapilotstudyfromatertiarymedicalcenter