Cargando…

An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes

BACKGROUND: Abutment surfaces are being designed to promote gingival soft tissue attachment and integration. This confirms implant survival for long term by forming a seal around the prosthetics. OBJECTIVES: This study was done to compare the biocompatibility of three implant abutments: titanium unc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagchi, Paulami, Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali, Magar, Swaroopkumar M, Priya, Ritu, Kochhar, Anuraj Singh, Agrawal, Sneh, AlMutairi, Faris Jaser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204906
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_116_20
_version_ 1784832483611639808
author Bagchi, Paulami
Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali
Magar, Swaroopkumar M
Priya, Ritu
Kochhar, Anuraj Singh
Agrawal, Sneh
AlMutairi, Faris Jaser
author_facet Bagchi, Paulami
Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali
Magar, Swaroopkumar M
Priya, Ritu
Kochhar, Anuraj Singh
Agrawal, Sneh
AlMutairi, Faris Jaser
author_sort Bagchi, Paulami
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abutment surfaces are being designed to promote gingival soft tissue attachment and integration. This confirms implant survival for long term by forming a seal around the prosthetics. OBJECTIVES: This study was done to compare the biocompatibility of three implant abutments: titanium uncoated, Ti-nitride coated, and modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with human gingival keratinocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The titanium-uncoated, titanium-nitride-coated, and modified PEEK discs (13 mm × 3 mm) were fabricated and compared with uncoated polyester cell culture discs, which were used as controls. These three implant abutments were evaluated for biocompatibility with respect to human gingival keratinocytes for viability, morphology, proliferation, and migration by scanning electron microscopy imaging and scratch wound healing assays. Measurements of roughness show changes between the investigated surfaces. RESULTS: Keratinocytes cultured on all examined surfaces indicated adhesion and attachment. An assay of cell viability showed no substantial variances among the groups. The modified PEEK surface showed greater cell proliferation and migration among the three abutment materials. CONCLUSION: All three abutment material surface types showed similar epithelial biological responses. However, modified PEEK material showed the highest biocompatibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9671176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96711762022-11-18 An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes Bagchi, Paulami Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali Magar, Swaroopkumar M Priya, Ritu Kochhar, Anuraj Singh Agrawal, Sneh AlMutairi, Faris Jaser Ann Afr Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Abutment surfaces are being designed to promote gingival soft tissue attachment and integration. This confirms implant survival for long term by forming a seal around the prosthetics. OBJECTIVES: This study was done to compare the biocompatibility of three implant abutments: titanium uncoated, Ti-nitride coated, and modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with human gingival keratinocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The titanium-uncoated, titanium-nitride-coated, and modified PEEK discs (13 mm × 3 mm) were fabricated and compared with uncoated polyester cell culture discs, which were used as controls. These three implant abutments were evaluated for biocompatibility with respect to human gingival keratinocytes for viability, morphology, proliferation, and migration by scanning electron microscopy imaging and scratch wound healing assays. Measurements of roughness show changes between the investigated surfaces. RESULTS: Keratinocytes cultured on all examined surfaces indicated adhesion and attachment. An assay of cell viability showed no substantial variances among the groups. The modified PEEK surface showed greater cell proliferation and migration among the three abutment materials. CONCLUSION: All three abutment material surface types showed similar epithelial biological responses. However, modified PEEK material showed the highest biocompatibility. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9671176/ /pubmed/36204906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_116_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Annals of African Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bagchi, Paulami
Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali
Magar, Swaroopkumar M
Priya, Ritu
Kochhar, Anuraj Singh
Agrawal, Sneh
AlMutairi, Faris Jaser
An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes
title An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes
title_full An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes
title_fullStr An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes
title_full_unstemmed An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes
title_short An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes
title_sort in vitro evaluation of effect of implant abutment on human gingival epithelial keratinocytes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204906
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_116_20
work_keys_str_mv AT bagchipaulami aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT alfawzanahmedali aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT magarswaroopkumarm aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT priyaritu aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT kochharanurajsingh aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT agrawalsneh aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT almutairifarisjaser aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT bagchipaulami invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT alfawzanahmedali invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT magarswaroopkumarm invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT priyaritu invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT kochharanurajsingh invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT agrawalsneh invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes
AT almutairifarisjaser invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes