Cargando…
An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes
BACKGROUND: Abutment surfaces are being designed to promote gingival soft tissue attachment and integration. This confirms implant survival for long term by forming a seal around the prosthetics. OBJECTIVES: This study was done to compare the biocompatibility of three implant abutments: titanium unc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_116_20 |
_version_ | 1784832483611639808 |
---|---|
author | Bagchi, Paulami Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali Magar, Swaroopkumar M Priya, Ritu Kochhar, Anuraj Singh Agrawal, Sneh AlMutairi, Faris Jaser |
author_facet | Bagchi, Paulami Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali Magar, Swaroopkumar M Priya, Ritu Kochhar, Anuraj Singh Agrawal, Sneh AlMutairi, Faris Jaser |
author_sort | Bagchi, Paulami |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Abutment surfaces are being designed to promote gingival soft tissue attachment and integration. This confirms implant survival for long term by forming a seal around the prosthetics. OBJECTIVES: This study was done to compare the biocompatibility of three implant abutments: titanium uncoated, Ti-nitride coated, and modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with human gingival keratinocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The titanium-uncoated, titanium-nitride-coated, and modified PEEK discs (13 mm × 3 mm) were fabricated and compared with uncoated polyester cell culture discs, which were used as controls. These three implant abutments were evaluated for biocompatibility with respect to human gingival keratinocytes for viability, morphology, proliferation, and migration by scanning electron microscopy imaging and scratch wound healing assays. Measurements of roughness show changes between the investigated surfaces. RESULTS: Keratinocytes cultured on all examined surfaces indicated adhesion and attachment. An assay of cell viability showed no substantial variances among the groups. The modified PEEK surface showed greater cell proliferation and migration among the three abutment materials. CONCLUSION: All three abutment material surface types showed similar epithelial biological responses. However, modified PEEK material showed the highest biocompatibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9671176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96711762022-11-18 An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes Bagchi, Paulami Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali Magar, Swaroopkumar M Priya, Ritu Kochhar, Anuraj Singh Agrawal, Sneh AlMutairi, Faris Jaser Ann Afr Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Abutment surfaces are being designed to promote gingival soft tissue attachment and integration. This confirms implant survival for long term by forming a seal around the prosthetics. OBJECTIVES: This study was done to compare the biocompatibility of three implant abutments: titanium uncoated, Ti-nitride coated, and modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with human gingival keratinocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The titanium-uncoated, titanium-nitride-coated, and modified PEEK discs (13 mm × 3 mm) were fabricated and compared with uncoated polyester cell culture discs, which were used as controls. These three implant abutments were evaluated for biocompatibility with respect to human gingival keratinocytes for viability, morphology, proliferation, and migration by scanning electron microscopy imaging and scratch wound healing assays. Measurements of roughness show changes between the investigated surfaces. RESULTS: Keratinocytes cultured on all examined surfaces indicated adhesion and attachment. An assay of cell viability showed no substantial variances among the groups. The modified PEEK surface showed greater cell proliferation and migration among the three abutment materials. CONCLUSION: All three abutment material surface types showed similar epithelial biological responses. However, modified PEEK material showed the highest biocompatibility. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9671176/ /pubmed/36204906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_116_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Annals of African Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bagchi, Paulami Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali Magar, Swaroopkumar M Priya, Ritu Kochhar, Anuraj Singh Agrawal, Sneh AlMutairi, Faris Jaser An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes |
title | An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes |
title_full | An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes |
title_fullStr | An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes |
title_full_unstemmed | An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes |
title_short | An In vitro Evaluation of Effect of Implant Abutment on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes |
title_sort | in vitro evaluation of effect of implant abutment on human gingival epithelial keratinocytes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_116_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bagchipaulami aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT alfawzanahmedali aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT magarswaroopkumarm aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT priyaritu aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT kochharanurajsingh aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT agrawalsneh aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT almutairifarisjaser aninvitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT bagchipaulami invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT alfawzanahmedali invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT magarswaroopkumarm invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT priyaritu invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT kochharanurajsingh invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT agrawalsneh invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes AT almutairifarisjaser invitroevaluationofeffectofimplantabutmentonhumangingivalepithelialkeratinocytes |