Cargando…
Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies involving large samples usually face financial and operational challenges. OBJECTIVES: To describe the planning and execution of ADHERE Brazil, an epidemiological study on 1,105 kidney transplant patients, and report on how the study was structured, difficulties f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35507993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0492.R1.15092021 |
_version_ | 1784832500943552512 |
---|---|
author | Marsicano-Souza, Elisa Oliveira Colugnati, Fernando Antônio Basile de Castro, Barbara Bruna Abreu Van Keullen, Maria do Socorro De Geest, Sabina Sanders-Pinheiro, Helady |
author_facet | Marsicano-Souza, Elisa Oliveira Colugnati, Fernando Antônio Basile de Castro, Barbara Bruna Abreu Van Keullen, Maria do Socorro De Geest, Sabina Sanders-Pinheiro, Helady |
author_sort | Marsicano-Souza, Elisa Oliveira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies involving large samples usually face financial and operational challenges. OBJECTIVES: To describe the planning and execution of ADHERE Brazil, an epidemiological study on 1,105 kidney transplant patients, and report on how the study was structured, difficulties faced and solutions found. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional multicenter study in 20 Brazilian kidney transplantation centers. METHODS: Actions developed in each phase of implementation were described, with emphasis on innovations used within the logistics of this study, aimed at estimating the prevalence of nonadherence to treatment. RESULTS: Coordination of activities was divided into four areas: general, regulatory, data collection and statistics. Weekly meetings were held for action planning. The general coordination team was in charge of project elaboration, choice of participating centers, definition of publication policy and monitoring other coordination teams. The regulatory team provided support to centers for submitting the project to ethics committees. The data collection team prepared a manual on the electronic collection system, scheduled web meetings and was available to respond to queries. It also monitored the data quality and reported any inadequacies found. Communication with the centers was through monthly reports via e-mail and distribution of exclusive material. The statistical team acted in all phases of the study, especially in creating the data analysis plan and data bank, generation of randomization lists and data extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Through these logistics, we collected high-quality data and built a local research infrastructure for further studies. We present supporting alternatives for conducting similar studies. CLINICAL TRIAL ANNOTATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ on October 10, 2013; NCT02066935. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9671250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96712502022-11-18 Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study Marsicano-Souza, Elisa Oliveira Colugnati, Fernando Antônio Basile de Castro, Barbara Bruna Abreu Van Keullen, Maria do Socorro De Geest, Sabina Sanders-Pinheiro, Helady Sao Paulo Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies involving large samples usually face financial and operational challenges. OBJECTIVES: To describe the planning and execution of ADHERE Brazil, an epidemiological study on 1,105 kidney transplant patients, and report on how the study was structured, difficulties faced and solutions found. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional multicenter study in 20 Brazilian kidney transplantation centers. METHODS: Actions developed in each phase of implementation were described, with emphasis on innovations used within the logistics of this study, aimed at estimating the prevalence of nonadherence to treatment. RESULTS: Coordination of activities was divided into four areas: general, regulatory, data collection and statistics. Weekly meetings were held for action planning. The general coordination team was in charge of project elaboration, choice of participating centers, definition of publication policy and monitoring other coordination teams. The regulatory team provided support to centers for submitting the project to ethics committees. The data collection team prepared a manual on the electronic collection system, scheduled web meetings and was available to respond to queries. It also monitored the data quality and reported any inadequacies found. Communication with the centers was through monthly reports via e-mail and distribution of exclusive material. The statistical team acted in all phases of the study, especially in creating the data analysis plan and data bank, generation of randomization lists and data extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Through these logistics, we collected high-quality data and built a local research infrastructure for further studies. We present supporting alternatives for conducting similar studies. CLINICAL TRIAL ANNOTATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ on October 10, 2013; NCT02066935. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9671250/ /pubmed/35507993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0492.R1.15092021 Text en © 2022 by Associação Paulista de Medicina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Marsicano-Souza, Elisa Oliveira Colugnati, Fernando Antônio Basile de Castro, Barbara Bruna Abreu Van Keullen, Maria do Socorro De Geest, Sabina Sanders-Pinheiro, Helady Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study |
title | Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study |
title_full | Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study |
title_fullStr | Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study |
title_full_unstemmed | Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study |
title_short | Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study |
title_sort | management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the adhere brazil study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35507993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0492.R1.15092021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marsicanosouzaelisaoliveira managementstrategiesforimplementingamulticentercrosssectionalstudylessonsfromtheadherebrazilstudy AT colugnatifernandoantoniobasile managementstrategiesforimplementingamulticentercrosssectionalstudylessonsfromtheadherebrazilstudy AT decastrobarbarabrunaabreu managementstrategiesforimplementingamulticentercrosssectionalstudylessonsfromtheadherebrazilstudy AT vankeullenmariadosocorro managementstrategiesforimplementingamulticentercrosssectionalstudylessonsfromtheadherebrazilstudy AT degeestsabina managementstrategiesforimplementingamulticentercrosssectionalstudylessonsfromtheadherebrazilstudy AT sanderspinheirohelady managementstrategiesforimplementingamulticentercrosssectionalstudylessonsfromtheadherebrazilstudy |