Cargando…

The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol

Since the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a rapid uptake and utilisation of telemedicine in all aspects of healthcare. This presents a key opportunity in surgical site infection surveillance. Remote follow up methods have been used via telephone, with photographs and questionnaires for post-operati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lathan, Ross, Sidapra, Misha, Yiasemidou, Marina, Long, Judith, Totty, Joshua, Smith, George, Chetter, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263549
_version_ 1784832545455603712
author Lathan, Ross
Sidapra, Misha
Yiasemidou, Marina
Long, Judith
Totty, Joshua
Smith, George
Chetter, Ian
author_facet Lathan, Ross
Sidapra, Misha
Yiasemidou, Marina
Long, Judith
Totty, Joshua
Smith, George
Chetter, Ian
author_sort Lathan, Ross
collection PubMed
description Since the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a rapid uptake and utilisation of telemedicine in all aspects of healthcare. This presents a key opportunity in surgical site infection surveillance. Remote follow up methods have been used via telephone, with photographs and questionnaires for post-operative reviews with varying results. This review therefore aims to comprehensively synthesise available evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of all forms of SSI telemedicine monitoring. The protocol has been established as per both PRISMA-P (S1 Table) and the Cochrane handbook for reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL will be searched using a complete search strategy developed with librarian input, in addition to google scholar and hand searching. All study designs with patients over 18 and undergone a primarily closed surgical procedure will be eligible. Index tests will include all forms of telemedicine and a subgroup analysis performed for each of these. Comparative tests must include face to face review, and all reference standards will be included again for sub-group analyses. Search results will be screened by two investigators independently with a third providing consensus review on disagreements. Methodological quality will be assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, first validated by two investigators as per the Cochrane handbook. Exploratory analysis will formulate summary receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots with estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the included studies. Sources of heterogeneity will be identifying and investigated through further analysis. Potential benefits of telemedicine integration in surgical practice will reduce cost and travel time to patients in addition to avoiding wasted clinic appointments, important considerations in a peri-pandemic era. To avoid missed or further complications, there must be confidence in the ability to diagnose infection. This review will systematically determine whether telemedicine is accurate for surgical site infection diagnosis, which methods are well established and if further research is indicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9671442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96714422022-11-18 The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol Lathan, Ross Sidapra, Misha Yiasemidou, Marina Long, Judith Totty, Joshua Smith, George Chetter, Ian PLoS One Study Protocol Since the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a rapid uptake and utilisation of telemedicine in all aspects of healthcare. This presents a key opportunity in surgical site infection surveillance. Remote follow up methods have been used via telephone, with photographs and questionnaires for post-operative reviews with varying results. This review therefore aims to comprehensively synthesise available evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of all forms of SSI telemedicine monitoring. The protocol has been established as per both PRISMA-P (S1 Table) and the Cochrane handbook for reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL will be searched using a complete search strategy developed with librarian input, in addition to google scholar and hand searching. All study designs with patients over 18 and undergone a primarily closed surgical procedure will be eligible. Index tests will include all forms of telemedicine and a subgroup analysis performed for each of these. Comparative tests must include face to face review, and all reference standards will be included again for sub-group analyses. Search results will be screened by two investigators independently with a third providing consensus review on disagreements. Methodological quality will be assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, first validated by two investigators as per the Cochrane handbook. Exploratory analysis will formulate summary receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots with estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the included studies. Sources of heterogeneity will be identifying and investigated through further analysis. Potential benefits of telemedicine integration in surgical practice will reduce cost and travel time to patients in addition to avoiding wasted clinic appointments, important considerations in a peri-pandemic era. To avoid missed or further complications, there must be confidence in the ability to diagnose infection. This review will systematically determine whether telemedicine is accurate for surgical site infection diagnosis, which methods are well established and if further research is indicated. Public Library of Science 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9671442/ /pubmed/36395267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263549 Text en © 2022 Lathan et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lathan, Ross
Sidapra, Misha
Yiasemidou, Marina
Long, Judith
Totty, Joshua
Smith, George
Chetter, Ian
The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol
title The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol
title_full The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol
title_fullStr The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol
title_short The diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: A systematic review protocol
title_sort diagnostic test accuracy of telemedicine for detection of surgical site infection: a systematic review protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263549
work_keys_str_mv AT lathanross thediagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT sidapramisha thediagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT yiasemidoumarina thediagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT longjudith thediagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tottyjoshua thediagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT smithgeorge thediagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT chetterian thediagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lathanross diagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT sidapramisha diagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT yiasemidoumarina diagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT longjudith diagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tottyjoshua diagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT smithgeorge diagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol
AT chetterian diagnostictestaccuracyoftelemedicinefordetectionofsurgicalsiteinfectionasystematicreviewprotocol