Cargando…

An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique

BACKGROUND: Clinicians who divide their time between clinical work and research have contributed to some of the most fundamental breakthroughs in medicine in recent history, yet their role is not always well-understood or valued. Understanding the factors which contribute to career success for clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burke, Elaine, Misstear, Karen, Hennessy, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277361
_version_ 1784832546676146176
author Burke, Elaine
Misstear, Karen
Hennessy, Martina
author_facet Burke, Elaine
Misstear, Karen
Hennessy, Martina
author_sort Burke, Elaine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinicians who divide their time between clinical work and research have contributed to some of the most fundamental breakthroughs in medicine in recent history, yet their role is not always well-understood or valued. Understanding the factors which contribute to career success for clinical academics is critical for supporting this workforce. Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) provides a conceptual framework for career success, incorporating personal and environmental factors. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore clinical academics’ construal of successful clinical academic practice and to contribute to a holistic view of the professional identity of the clinical academic. METHODOLOGY: Using a constructivist technique, repertory grid, the authors interviewed ten clinical academics at different career stages in one-to-one structured interviews conducted virtually between November 2020 and April 2021. Data from the interviews were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Common themes were identified, analysed, and ranked according to importance with respect to successful clinical academic practice. Using SCCT as a framework, constructs were categorised as personal factors, organisational factors, competencies and person-environment fit. A differential analysis between established/trainee and female/male participants was carried out. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three constructs were elicited and categorised into 20 themes (constructs). There was consensus among participants that 6 were of high importance with respect to successful clinical academic practice, 8 of intermediate and 4 of low importance, with no consensus on 2 constructs. Personal factors of high importance include innovation and integrity. Competencies including research and teaching skills are highly important, and ability to collaborate is also considered central to successful clinical academic practice. Female participants expressed greater concerns about the impact of familial responsibilities on career progression. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of interactions between the person and environment, and characterises the important attributes of successful clinical academics including personal factors such as integrity and innovation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9671447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96714472022-11-18 An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique Burke, Elaine Misstear, Karen Hennessy, Martina PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinicians who divide their time between clinical work and research have contributed to some of the most fundamental breakthroughs in medicine in recent history, yet their role is not always well-understood or valued. Understanding the factors which contribute to career success for clinical academics is critical for supporting this workforce. Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) provides a conceptual framework for career success, incorporating personal and environmental factors. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore clinical academics’ construal of successful clinical academic practice and to contribute to a holistic view of the professional identity of the clinical academic. METHODOLOGY: Using a constructivist technique, repertory grid, the authors interviewed ten clinical academics at different career stages in one-to-one structured interviews conducted virtually between November 2020 and April 2021. Data from the interviews were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Common themes were identified, analysed, and ranked according to importance with respect to successful clinical academic practice. Using SCCT as a framework, constructs were categorised as personal factors, organisational factors, competencies and person-environment fit. A differential analysis between established/trainee and female/male participants was carried out. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three constructs were elicited and categorised into 20 themes (constructs). There was consensus among participants that 6 were of high importance with respect to successful clinical academic practice, 8 of intermediate and 4 of low importance, with no consensus on 2 constructs. Personal factors of high importance include innovation and integrity. Competencies including research and teaching skills are highly important, and ability to collaborate is also considered central to successful clinical academic practice. Female participants expressed greater concerns about the impact of familial responsibilities on career progression. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of interactions between the person and environment, and characterises the important attributes of successful clinical academics including personal factors such as integrity and innovation. Public Library of Science 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9671447/ /pubmed/36395251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277361 Text en © 2022 Burke et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burke, Elaine
Misstear, Karen
Hennessy, Martina
An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique
title An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique
title_full An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique
title_fullStr An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique
title_full_unstemmed An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique
title_short An exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique
title_sort exploration of the professional identity of clinical academics using repertory grid technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277361
work_keys_str_mv AT burkeelaine anexplorationoftheprofessionalidentityofclinicalacademicsusingrepertorygridtechnique
AT misstearkaren anexplorationoftheprofessionalidentityofclinicalacademicsusingrepertorygridtechnique
AT hennessymartina anexplorationoftheprofessionalidentityofclinicalacademicsusingrepertorygridtechnique
AT burkeelaine explorationoftheprofessionalidentityofclinicalacademicsusingrepertorygridtechnique
AT misstearkaren explorationoftheprofessionalidentityofclinicalacademicsusingrepertorygridtechnique
AT hennessymartina explorationoftheprofessionalidentityofclinicalacademicsusingrepertorygridtechnique