Cargando…

P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of prescribing mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of abnormal early pregnancy in emergency departments (EDs) compared to outpatient management at a complex family planning office, and to compare post-treatment follow-up. METHODS: We cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bleck, RR, Virani, V, Nguyen, N, McWalters, J, Danvers, AA, Gurney, EP
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671652/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.111
_version_ 1784832597140963328
author Bleck, RR
Virani, V
Nguyen, N
McWalters, J
Danvers, AA
Gurney, EP
author_facet Bleck, RR
Virani, V
Nguyen, N
McWalters, J
Danvers, AA
Gurney, EP
author_sort Bleck, RR
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of prescribing mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of abnormal early pregnancy in emergency departments (EDs) compared to outpatient management at a complex family planning office, and to compare post-treatment follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study after implementing mifepristone and misoprostol prescription in three Bronx, NY EDs during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave. All patients receiving medical management between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared by treatment setting. Induced abortion only occurred in the outpatient setting. Treatment success was defined as pregnancy resolution after one dose of mifepristone and misoprostol. Safety outcomes included emergent interventions and blood transfusion. We assessed rates of post-treatment follow-up. RESULTS: Some 167 patients received medical management: 33 (19.8%) in the ED and 134 (80.2%) outpatient. ED patients were older (aged 30.9±6.9 vs. 28.1±5.9, p=0.02) and more likely to have Medicaid insurance (81.8% vs. 51.5%, p=0.003). Treatment success occurred for 23 (69.7%) ED and 119 (88.8%) office patients. A multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, insurance status, and pregnancy diagnosis showed lower odds of treatment success in the ED vs. outpatient setting, but was not statistically significant (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.60; 95% CI, 0.17–2.09; p=0.42). ED safety outcomes included two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Outpatient safety outcomes included one admission for intravenous antibiotics. Follow-up was similar: 28 (84%) ED vs 121 (90.3%) outpatients (p=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Medical management of abnormal early pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in the ED is effective. Larger studies are needed to better quantify ED safety outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9671652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96716522022-11-18 P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access Bleck, RR Virani, V Nguyen, N McWalters, J Danvers, AA Gurney, EP Contraception Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of prescribing mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of abnormal early pregnancy in emergency departments (EDs) compared to outpatient management at a complex family planning office, and to compare post-treatment follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study after implementing mifepristone and misoprostol prescription in three Bronx, NY EDs during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave. All patients receiving medical management between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared by treatment setting. Induced abortion only occurred in the outpatient setting. Treatment success was defined as pregnancy resolution after one dose of mifepristone and misoprostol. Safety outcomes included emergent interventions and blood transfusion. We assessed rates of post-treatment follow-up. RESULTS: Some 167 patients received medical management: 33 (19.8%) in the ED and 134 (80.2%) outpatient. ED patients were older (aged 30.9±6.9 vs. 28.1±5.9, p=0.02) and more likely to have Medicaid insurance (81.8% vs. 51.5%, p=0.003). Treatment success occurred for 23 (69.7%) ED and 119 (88.8%) office patients. A multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, insurance status, and pregnancy diagnosis showed lower odds of treatment success in the ED vs. outpatient setting, but was not statistically significant (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.60; 95% CI, 0.17–2.09; p=0.42). ED safety outcomes included two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Outpatient safety outcomes included one admission for intravenous antibiotics. Follow-up was similar: 28 (84%) ED vs 121 (90.3%) outpatients (p=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Medical management of abnormal early pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in the ED is effective. Larger studies are needed to better quantify ED safety outcomes. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-12 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9671652/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.111 Text en Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Bleck, RR
Virani, V
Nguyen, N
McWalters, J
Danvers, AA
Gurney, EP
P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access
title P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access
title_full P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access
title_fullStr P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access
title_full_unstemmed P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access
title_short P087Medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: Evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access
title_sort p087medical management of early pregnancy in emergency departments compared to outpatient: evaluating a covid-19 institutional policy change to increase healthcare access
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671652/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.111
work_keys_str_mv AT bleckrr p087medicalmanagementofearlypregnancyinemergencydepartmentscomparedtooutpatientevaluatingacovid19institutionalpolicychangetoincreasehealthcareaccess
AT viraniv p087medicalmanagementofearlypregnancyinemergencydepartmentscomparedtooutpatientevaluatingacovid19institutionalpolicychangetoincreasehealthcareaccess
AT nguyenn p087medicalmanagementofearlypregnancyinemergencydepartmentscomparedtooutpatientevaluatingacovid19institutionalpolicychangetoincreasehealthcareaccess
AT mcwaltersj p087medicalmanagementofearlypregnancyinemergencydepartmentscomparedtooutpatientevaluatingacovid19institutionalpolicychangetoincreasehealthcareaccess
AT danversaa p087medicalmanagementofearlypregnancyinemergencydepartmentscomparedtooutpatientevaluatingacovid19institutionalpolicychangetoincreasehealthcareaccess
AT gurneyep p087medicalmanagementofearlypregnancyinemergencydepartmentscomparedtooutpatientevaluatingacovid19institutionalpolicychangetoincreasehealthcareaccess