Cargando…

Assessment of dd-cfDNA Levels in Clinically Stable Lung Allograft Recipients Beyond the Initial 2 y Posttransplant

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of acute allograft injury within the first 1 to 2 y after lung transplant, but its utility for diagnosing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has not yet been studied. Understanding baseline dd-cfDNA kinetics beyond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trindade, Anil J., Chapin, Kaitlyn C., Mullican, Amy, Gray, Jennifer N., Hoy, Haley, Demarest, Caitlin T., Lambright, Eric S., McPherson, Katie A., Norfolk, Stephanie G., Robbins, Ivan M., Bacchetta, Matthew, Erasmus, David B., Shaver, Ciara M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36406896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001411
Descripción
Sumario:Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of acute allograft injury within the first 1 to 2 y after lung transplant, but its utility for diagnosing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has not yet been studied. Understanding baseline dd-cfDNA kinetics beyond the initial 2 y posttransplant is a necessary first step in determining the utility of dd-cfDNA as a CLAD biomarker. We seek to establish baseline dd-cfDNA% levels in clinically stable lung allograft recipients who are >2 y posttransplant. METHODS. We performed a prospective, single-center, observational study to identify plasma dd-cfDNA levels in clinically stable lung allograft recipients >2 y posttransplant. RESULTS. Fifty-one subjects were enrolled and ≥3 baseline dd-cfDNA measurements were acquired during a median of 252 d. The median baseline percent dd-cfDNA level in our cohort was 0.45% (interquartile range [IQR], 0.26–0.69). There were statistically significant differences in dd-cfDNA based on posttransplant duration (≤5 y posttransplant median 0.41% [IQR, 0.21–0.64] versus >5 y posttransplant median 0.50% [IQR, 0.33–0.76]; P < 0.02). However, the clinical significance of this small change in dd-cfDNA is uncertain because this magnitude of change is within the biologic test variation of 73%. CONCLUSIONS. This study is the first to define levels of dd-cfDNA in clinically stable patients who are >2 y post–lung transplant. These findings lay the groundwork for the study of dd-cfDNA as a possible biomarker for CLAD.