Cargando…

Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography

Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Kang, Yuh, Da-Yo, Lin, Shao-Chieh, Lyu, Pin-Sian, Pan, Guan-Xin, Zhuang, Yi-Chun, Chang, Chia-Ching, Peng, Hsu-Hsia, Lee, Tung-Yang, Juan, Cheng-Hsuan, Juan, Cheng-En, Liu, Yi-Jui, Juan, Chun-Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7
_version_ 1784832691856736256
author Hsu, Kang
Yuh, Da-Yo
Lin, Shao-Chieh
Lyu, Pin-Sian
Pan, Guan-Xin
Zhuang, Yi-Chun
Chang, Chia-Ching
Peng, Hsu-Hsia
Lee, Tung-Yang
Juan, Cheng-Hsuan
Juan, Cheng-En
Liu, Yi-Jui
Juan, Chun-Jung
author_facet Hsu, Kang
Yuh, Da-Yo
Lin, Shao-Chieh
Lyu, Pin-Sian
Pan, Guan-Xin
Zhuang, Yi-Chun
Chang, Chia-Ching
Peng, Hsu-Hsia
Lee, Tung-Yang
Juan, Cheng-Hsuan
Juan, Cheng-En
Liu, Yi-Jui
Juan, Chun-Jung
author_sort Hsu, Kang
collection PubMed
description Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. This study retrospectively enrolled 24 patients who received CBCT. Five U-Nets, including 2Da U-Net, 2Dc U-Net, 2Ds U-Net, 2.5Da U-Net, 3D U-Net, were trained to segment the teeth. Four additional U-Nets, including 2.5Dv U-Net, 3.5Dv5 U-Net, 3.5Dv4 U-Net, and 3.5Dv3 U-Net, were obtained using majority voting. Mathematical morphology operations including erosion and dilation (E&D) were applied to remove diminutive noise speckles. Segmentation performance was evaluated by fourfold cross validation using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was used for group comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Performance of U-Nets significantly varies among different training strategies for teeth segmentation on CBCT (P < 0.05). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net and 2.5Dv U-Net showed DSC and PPV significantly higher than any of five originally trained U-Nets (all P < 0.05). E&D significantly improved the DSC, accuracy, specificity, and PPV (all P < 0.005). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved highest DSC and accuracy among all U-Nets. The segmentation performance of the U-Net can be improved by majority voting and E&D. Overall speaking, the 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved the best segmentation performance among all U-Nets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9672125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96721252022-11-19 Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography Hsu, Kang Yuh, Da-Yo Lin, Shao-Chieh Lyu, Pin-Sian Pan, Guan-Xin Zhuang, Yi-Chun Chang, Chia-Ching Peng, Hsu-Hsia Lee, Tung-Yang Juan, Cheng-Hsuan Juan, Cheng-En Liu, Yi-Jui Juan, Chun-Jung Sci Rep Article Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. This study retrospectively enrolled 24 patients who received CBCT. Five U-Nets, including 2Da U-Net, 2Dc U-Net, 2Ds U-Net, 2.5Da U-Net, 3D U-Net, were trained to segment the teeth. Four additional U-Nets, including 2.5Dv U-Net, 3.5Dv5 U-Net, 3.5Dv4 U-Net, and 3.5Dv3 U-Net, were obtained using majority voting. Mathematical morphology operations including erosion and dilation (E&D) were applied to remove diminutive noise speckles. Segmentation performance was evaluated by fourfold cross validation using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was used for group comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Performance of U-Nets significantly varies among different training strategies for teeth segmentation on CBCT (P < 0.05). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net and 2.5Dv U-Net showed DSC and PPV significantly higher than any of five originally trained U-Nets (all P < 0.05). E&D significantly improved the DSC, accuracy, specificity, and PPV (all P < 0.005). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved highest DSC and accuracy among all U-Nets. The segmentation performance of the U-Net can be improved by majority voting and E&D. Overall speaking, the 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved the best segmentation performance among all U-Nets. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9672125/ /pubmed/36396696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hsu, Kang
Yuh, Da-Yo
Lin, Shao-Chieh
Lyu, Pin-Sian
Pan, Guan-Xin
Zhuang, Yi-Chun
Chang, Chia-Ching
Peng, Hsu-Hsia
Lee, Tung-Yang
Juan, Cheng-Hsuan
Juan, Cheng-En
Liu, Yi-Jui
Juan, Chun-Jung
Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_full Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_short Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_sort improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5d u-net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hsukang improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT yuhdayo improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT linshaochieh improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT lyupinsian improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT panguanxin improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT zhuangyichun improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT changchiaching improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT penghsuhsia improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT leetungyang improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT juanchenghsuan improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT juanchengen improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT liuyijui improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT juanchunjung improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography