Cargando…
Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7 |
_version_ | 1784832691856736256 |
---|---|
author | Hsu, Kang Yuh, Da-Yo Lin, Shao-Chieh Lyu, Pin-Sian Pan, Guan-Xin Zhuang, Yi-Chun Chang, Chia-Ching Peng, Hsu-Hsia Lee, Tung-Yang Juan, Cheng-Hsuan Juan, Cheng-En Liu, Yi-Jui Juan, Chun-Jung |
author_facet | Hsu, Kang Yuh, Da-Yo Lin, Shao-Chieh Lyu, Pin-Sian Pan, Guan-Xin Zhuang, Yi-Chun Chang, Chia-Ching Peng, Hsu-Hsia Lee, Tung-Yang Juan, Cheng-Hsuan Juan, Cheng-En Liu, Yi-Jui Juan, Chun-Jung |
author_sort | Hsu, Kang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. This study retrospectively enrolled 24 patients who received CBCT. Five U-Nets, including 2Da U-Net, 2Dc U-Net, 2Ds U-Net, 2.5Da U-Net, 3D U-Net, were trained to segment the teeth. Four additional U-Nets, including 2.5Dv U-Net, 3.5Dv5 U-Net, 3.5Dv4 U-Net, and 3.5Dv3 U-Net, were obtained using majority voting. Mathematical morphology operations including erosion and dilation (E&D) were applied to remove diminutive noise speckles. Segmentation performance was evaluated by fourfold cross validation using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was used for group comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Performance of U-Nets significantly varies among different training strategies for teeth segmentation on CBCT (P < 0.05). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net and 2.5Dv U-Net showed DSC and PPV significantly higher than any of five originally trained U-Nets (all P < 0.05). E&D significantly improved the DSC, accuracy, specificity, and PPV (all P < 0.005). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved highest DSC and accuracy among all U-Nets. The segmentation performance of the U-Net can be improved by majority voting and E&D. Overall speaking, the 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved the best segmentation performance among all U-Nets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9672125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96721252022-11-19 Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography Hsu, Kang Yuh, Da-Yo Lin, Shao-Chieh Lyu, Pin-Sian Pan, Guan-Xin Zhuang, Yi-Chun Chang, Chia-Ching Peng, Hsu-Hsia Lee, Tung-Yang Juan, Cheng-Hsuan Juan, Cheng-En Liu, Yi-Jui Juan, Chun-Jung Sci Rep Article Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. This study retrospectively enrolled 24 patients who received CBCT. Five U-Nets, including 2Da U-Net, 2Dc U-Net, 2Ds U-Net, 2.5Da U-Net, 3D U-Net, were trained to segment the teeth. Four additional U-Nets, including 2.5Dv U-Net, 3.5Dv5 U-Net, 3.5Dv4 U-Net, and 3.5Dv3 U-Net, were obtained using majority voting. Mathematical morphology operations including erosion and dilation (E&D) were applied to remove diminutive noise speckles. Segmentation performance was evaluated by fourfold cross validation using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was used for group comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Performance of U-Nets significantly varies among different training strategies for teeth segmentation on CBCT (P < 0.05). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net and 2.5Dv U-Net showed DSC and PPV significantly higher than any of five originally trained U-Nets (all P < 0.05). E&D significantly improved the DSC, accuracy, specificity, and PPV (all P < 0.005). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved highest DSC and accuracy among all U-Nets. The segmentation performance of the U-Net can be improved by majority voting and E&D. Overall speaking, the 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved the best segmentation performance among all U-Nets. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9672125/ /pubmed/36396696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hsu, Kang Yuh, Da-Yo Lin, Shao-Chieh Lyu, Pin-Sian Pan, Guan-Xin Zhuang, Yi-Chun Chang, Chia-Ching Peng, Hsu-Hsia Lee, Tung-Yang Juan, Cheng-Hsuan Juan, Cheng-En Liu, Yi-Jui Juan, Chun-Jung Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography |
title | Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography |
title_full | Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography |
title_short | Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography |
title_sort | improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5d u-net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsukang improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT yuhdayo improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT linshaochieh improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT lyupinsian improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT panguanxin improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT zhuangyichun improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT changchiaching improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT penghsuhsia improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT leetungyang improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT juanchenghsuan improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT juanchengen improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT liuyijui improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography AT juanchunjung improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography |