Cargando…

Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation

Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole cranio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turcas, Andrada, Kelly, Sarah M., Clementel, Enrico, Cernea, Dana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.003
_version_ 1784832693418065920
author Turcas, Andrada
Kelly, Sarah M.
Clementel, Enrico
Cernea, Dana
author_facet Turcas, Andrada
Kelly, Sarah M.
Clementel, Enrico
Cernea, Dana
author_sort Turcas, Andrada
collection PubMed
description Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) using Tomotherapy and offers a comprehensive comparison between Tomotherapy and other radiotherapy delivery techniques. Databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the keywords “tomotherapy” AND “craniospinal”. Fifty-six papers were included in the review. Patient population was adult in 9 papers, paediatric in 26 papers and mixed in 14 papers. Patients treated with helical Tomotherapy had similar disease-specific clinical outcomes and toxicities as patients treated using other techniques. Compared to any other technique, Tomotherapy provides better target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity in 23, 34 and 22 reports. Tomotherapy showed better organ-at-risk sparing for the thyroid, parotids, cochlea, eyes, heart and esophagus. Beam-On-Time (BOT) was reported to be longer for Tomotherapy in most studies (Median BOT: HT = 11 min, VMAT = 5.49 min, 3DCRT = 1.46 min). In conclusion, Tomotherapy offers good cranio-spinal axis coverage with improved homogeneity and conformity compared to other techniques, but with a considerably longer treatment time. Clinical outcome and toxicities suggest using Tomotherapy for CSI is efficient and safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9672131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96721312022-11-19 Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation Turcas, Andrada Kelly, Sarah M. Clementel, Enrico Cernea, Dana Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Review Article Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) using Tomotherapy and offers a comprehensive comparison between Tomotherapy and other radiotherapy delivery techniques. Databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the keywords “tomotherapy” AND “craniospinal”. Fifty-six papers were included in the review. Patient population was adult in 9 papers, paediatric in 26 papers and mixed in 14 papers. Patients treated with helical Tomotherapy had similar disease-specific clinical outcomes and toxicities as patients treated using other techniques. Compared to any other technique, Tomotherapy provides better target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity in 23, 34 and 22 reports. Tomotherapy showed better organ-at-risk sparing for the thyroid, parotids, cochlea, eyes, heart and esophagus. Beam-On-Time (BOT) was reported to be longer for Tomotherapy in most studies (Median BOT: HT = 11 min, VMAT = 5.49 min, 3DCRT = 1.46 min). In conclusion, Tomotherapy offers good cranio-spinal axis coverage with improved homogeneity and conformity compared to other techniques, but with a considerably longer treatment time. Clinical outcome and toxicities suggest using Tomotherapy for CSI is efficient and safe. Elsevier 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9672131/ /pubmed/36407491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Turcas, Andrada
Kelly, Sarah M.
Clementel, Enrico
Cernea, Dana
Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
title Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
title_full Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
title_fullStr Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
title_short Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
title_sort tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT turcasandrada tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation
AT kellysarahm tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation
AT clementelenrico tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation
AT cerneadana tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation