Cargando…
Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation
Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole cranio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.003 |
_version_ | 1784832693418065920 |
---|---|
author | Turcas, Andrada Kelly, Sarah M. Clementel, Enrico Cernea, Dana |
author_facet | Turcas, Andrada Kelly, Sarah M. Clementel, Enrico Cernea, Dana |
author_sort | Turcas, Andrada |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) using Tomotherapy and offers a comprehensive comparison between Tomotherapy and other radiotherapy delivery techniques. Databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the keywords “tomotherapy” AND “craniospinal”. Fifty-six papers were included in the review. Patient population was adult in 9 papers, paediatric in 26 papers and mixed in 14 papers. Patients treated with helical Tomotherapy had similar disease-specific clinical outcomes and toxicities as patients treated using other techniques. Compared to any other technique, Tomotherapy provides better target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity in 23, 34 and 22 reports. Tomotherapy showed better organ-at-risk sparing for the thyroid, parotids, cochlea, eyes, heart and esophagus. Beam-On-Time (BOT) was reported to be longer for Tomotherapy in most studies (Median BOT: HT = 11 min, VMAT = 5.49 min, 3DCRT = 1.46 min). In conclusion, Tomotherapy offers good cranio-spinal axis coverage with improved homogeneity and conformity compared to other techniques, but with a considerably longer treatment time. Clinical outcome and toxicities suggest using Tomotherapy for CSI is efficient and safe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9672131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96721312022-11-19 Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation Turcas, Andrada Kelly, Sarah M. Clementel, Enrico Cernea, Dana Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Review Article Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) using Tomotherapy and offers a comprehensive comparison between Tomotherapy and other radiotherapy delivery techniques. Databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the keywords “tomotherapy” AND “craniospinal”. Fifty-six papers were included in the review. Patient population was adult in 9 papers, paediatric in 26 papers and mixed in 14 papers. Patients treated with helical Tomotherapy had similar disease-specific clinical outcomes and toxicities as patients treated using other techniques. Compared to any other technique, Tomotherapy provides better target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity in 23, 34 and 22 reports. Tomotherapy showed better organ-at-risk sparing for the thyroid, parotids, cochlea, eyes, heart and esophagus. Beam-On-Time (BOT) was reported to be longer for Tomotherapy in most studies (Median BOT: HT = 11 min, VMAT = 5.49 min, 3DCRT = 1.46 min). In conclusion, Tomotherapy offers good cranio-spinal axis coverage with improved homogeneity and conformity compared to other techniques, but with a considerably longer treatment time. Clinical outcome and toxicities suggest using Tomotherapy for CSI is efficient and safe. Elsevier 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9672131/ /pubmed/36407491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Turcas, Andrada Kelly, Sarah M. Clementel, Enrico Cernea, Dana Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation |
title | Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation |
title_full | Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation |
title_fullStr | Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation |
title_full_unstemmed | Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation |
title_short | Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation |
title_sort | tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turcasandrada tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation AT kellysarahm tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation AT clementelenrico tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation AT cerneadana tomotherapyforcraniospinalirradiation |