Cargando…
Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design
Data-driven design shows the promise of accelerating materials discovery but is challenging due to the prohibitive cost of searching the vast design space of chemistry, structure, and synthesis methods. Bayesian optimization (BO) employs uncertainty-aware machine learning models to select promising...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23431-2 |
_version_ | 1784832707623124992 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hengrui Chen, Wei (Wayne) Iyer, Akshay Apley, Daniel W. Chen, Wei |
author_facet | Zhang, Hengrui Chen, Wei (Wayne) Iyer, Akshay Apley, Daniel W. Chen, Wei |
author_sort | Zhang, Hengrui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data-driven design shows the promise of accelerating materials discovery but is challenging due to the prohibitive cost of searching the vast design space of chemistry, structure, and synthesis methods. Bayesian optimization (BO) employs uncertainty-aware machine learning models to select promising designs to evaluate, hence reducing the cost. However, BO with mixed numerical and categorical variables, which is of particular interest in materials design, has not been well studied. In this work, we survey frequentist and Bayesian approaches to uncertainty quantification of machine learning with mixed variables. We then conduct a systematic comparative study of their performances in BO using a popular representative model from each group, the random forest-based Lolo model (frequentist) and the latent variable Gaussian process model (Bayesian). We examine the efficacy of the two models in the optimization of mathematical functions, as well as properties of structural and functional materials, where we observe performance differences as related to problem dimensionality and complexity. By investigating the machine learning models’ predictive and uncertainty estimation capabilities, we provide interpretations of the observed performance differences. Our results provide practical guidance on choosing between frequentist and Bayesian uncertainty-aware machine learning models for mixed-variable BO in materials design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9672324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96723242022-11-19 Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design Zhang, Hengrui Chen, Wei (Wayne) Iyer, Akshay Apley, Daniel W. Chen, Wei Sci Rep Article Data-driven design shows the promise of accelerating materials discovery but is challenging due to the prohibitive cost of searching the vast design space of chemistry, structure, and synthesis methods. Bayesian optimization (BO) employs uncertainty-aware machine learning models to select promising designs to evaluate, hence reducing the cost. However, BO with mixed numerical and categorical variables, which is of particular interest in materials design, has not been well studied. In this work, we survey frequentist and Bayesian approaches to uncertainty quantification of machine learning with mixed variables. We then conduct a systematic comparative study of their performances in BO using a popular representative model from each group, the random forest-based Lolo model (frequentist) and the latent variable Gaussian process model (Bayesian). We examine the efficacy of the two models in the optimization of mathematical functions, as well as properties of structural and functional materials, where we observe performance differences as related to problem dimensionality and complexity. By investigating the machine learning models’ predictive and uncertainty estimation capabilities, we provide interpretations of the observed performance differences. Our results provide practical guidance on choosing between frequentist and Bayesian uncertainty-aware machine learning models for mixed-variable BO in materials design. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9672324/ /pubmed/36396678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23431-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Hengrui Chen, Wei (Wayne) Iyer, Akshay Apley, Daniel W. Chen, Wei Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design |
title | Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design |
title_full | Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design |
title_fullStr | Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design |
title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design |
title_short | Uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design |
title_sort | uncertainty-aware mixed-variable machine learning for materials design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23431-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghengrui uncertaintyawaremixedvariablemachinelearningformaterialsdesign AT chenweiwayne uncertaintyawaremixedvariablemachinelearningformaterialsdesign AT iyerakshay uncertaintyawaremixedvariablemachinelearningformaterialsdesign AT apleydanielw uncertaintyawaremixedvariablemachinelearningformaterialsdesign AT chenwei uncertaintyawaremixedvariablemachinelearningformaterialsdesign |