Cargando…

The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis

Oral health is a window to a patient’s general well-being. Balance in oral microbiome functions is crucial for health maintenance. A state of oral dysbiosis may lead to a variety of local and systemic pathological conditions. The presence of dental plaque is related to the majority of oral infection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudek-Wicher, R., Junka, A. F., Migdał, P., Korzeniowska-Kowal, A., Wzorek, A., Bartoszewicz, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4
_version_ 1784832777513861120
author Dudek-Wicher, R.
Junka, A. F.
Migdał, P.
Korzeniowska-Kowal, A.
Wzorek, A.
Bartoszewicz, M.
author_facet Dudek-Wicher, R.
Junka, A. F.
Migdał, P.
Korzeniowska-Kowal, A.
Wzorek, A.
Bartoszewicz, M.
author_sort Dudek-Wicher, R.
collection PubMed
description Oral health is a window to a patient’s general well-being. Balance in oral microbiome functions is crucial for health maintenance. A state of oral dysbiosis may lead to a variety of local and systemic pathological conditions. The presence of dental plaque is related to the majority of oral infections. Proper oral hygiene is crucial and the most economic practice contributing to oral health prophylaxis. Aside from prophylactic treatments provided by dental practitioners, mouth rinses, containing antimicrobial agents, are one of the possible tools used for oral care. Our study was to determine whether available mouth rinses and selected products dedicated for professional use are efficient to eradicate biofilm formed by reference and clinical strains of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Candida albicans on the surface of hydroxyapatite – major mineral component of a tooth. Therefore, such antimicrobials as chlorhexidine, cetylpyridine chloride, polyhexanide, silver nanoparticles, sulphonated phenolics, and natural antiplaque essential oils and coconut oil were analyzed. Applied experimental settings in in vitro models were designed to reflect accurately the recommended use of the tested substances, therefore four types of eradication procedure were conducted. Sialorrhea simulation was also performed to evaluate antibiofilm potential of diluted mouth rinses. Biofilm was investigated with quantitative method where absorbance values were measured. Statistical differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with a post-hoc Dunnett’s analysis. Results have shown that biofilms displayed a diversified sensitivity to the tested antimicrobials. The highest antibiofilm activity was detected for cetylpyridine chloride while the lowest for chlorhexidine. However the differences in E. faecalis biofilm reduction observed after the use of these two compounds were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), whereas all observed differences in S. aureus survival after exposure to the examined antimicrobial agents were statistically significant (p < 0.5). The PHMB, both in standard and in sialorrhea simulated conditions had the highest potential against streptococci. The coconut oil reduced C. albicans fungus biofilm by 65.48% but low eradication level was observed in case of bacterial biofilms. The dehydrating mechanism of action of sulfonated phenolics turned out to be ineffective against streptococcal biofilm which in turn was effectively eradicated by silver nanoparticles. The implementation of Antibiofilm Dressing's Activity Measurement method allowed to observe strain-related differences in terms of antimicrobial sensitivity. The obtained results may be introduced in everyday out-patient dental plaque prophylaxis as well as clinical environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9672622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96726222022-11-18 The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis Dudek-Wicher, R. Junka, A. F. Migdał, P. Korzeniowska-Kowal, A. Wzorek, A. Bartoszewicz, M. BMC Oral Health Research Oral health is a window to a patient’s general well-being. Balance in oral microbiome functions is crucial for health maintenance. A state of oral dysbiosis may lead to a variety of local and systemic pathological conditions. The presence of dental plaque is related to the majority of oral infections. Proper oral hygiene is crucial and the most economic practice contributing to oral health prophylaxis. Aside from prophylactic treatments provided by dental practitioners, mouth rinses, containing antimicrobial agents, are one of the possible tools used for oral care. Our study was to determine whether available mouth rinses and selected products dedicated for professional use are efficient to eradicate biofilm formed by reference and clinical strains of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Candida albicans on the surface of hydroxyapatite – major mineral component of a tooth. Therefore, such antimicrobials as chlorhexidine, cetylpyridine chloride, polyhexanide, silver nanoparticles, sulphonated phenolics, and natural antiplaque essential oils and coconut oil were analyzed. Applied experimental settings in in vitro models were designed to reflect accurately the recommended use of the tested substances, therefore four types of eradication procedure were conducted. Sialorrhea simulation was also performed to evaluate antibiofilm potential of diluted mouth rinses. Biofilm was investigated with quantitative method where absorbance values were measured. Statistical differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with a post-hoc Dunnett’s analysis. Results have shown that biofilms displayed a diversified sensitivity to the tested antimicrobials. The highest antibiofilm activity was detected for cetylpyridine chloride while the lowest for chlorhexidine. However the differences in E. faecalis biofilm reduction observed after the use of these two compounds were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), whereas all observed differences in S. aureus survival after exposure to the examined antimicrobial agents were statistically significant (p < 0.5). The PHMB, both in standard and in sialorrhea simulated conditions had the highest potential against streptococci. The coconut oil reduced C. albicans fungus biofilm by 65.48% but low eradication level was observed in case of bacterial biofilms. The dehydrating mechanism of action of sulfonated phenolics turned out to be ineffective against streptococcal biofilm which in turn was effectively eradicated by silver nanoparticles. The implementation of Antibiofilm Dressing's Activity Measurement method allowed to observe strain-related differences in terms of antimicrobial sensitivity. The obtained results may be introduced in everyday out-patient dental plaque prophylaxis as well as clinical environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4. BioMed Central 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9672622/ /pubmed/36397044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dudek-Wicher, R.
Junka, A. F.
Migdał, P.
Korzeniowska-Kowal, A.
Wzorek, A.
Bartoszewicz, M.
The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_full The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_fullStr The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_short The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_sort antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dudekwicherr theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT junkaaf theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT migdałp theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT korzeniowskakowala theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT wzoreka theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT bartoszewiczm theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT dudekwicherr antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT junkaaf antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT migdałp antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT korzeniowskakowala antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT wzoreka antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT bartoszewiczm antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis