Cargando…

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia

PURPOSE: To report retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in eyes with amblyopia compared with contralateral healthy eyes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included patients with anisometropic amblyopia, strabismic amblyopia, and mixed amblyopia. All subjects underwent complete ophtha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parikh, Rajul, Sachdeva, Virender, Kekunnaya, Ramesh, Rao, B Venkateshwar, Parikh, Shefali, Thomas, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918974
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2875_21
_version_ 1784832801465434112
author Parikh, Rajul
Sachdeva, Virender
Kekunnaya, Ramesh
Rao, B Venkateshwar
Parikh, Shefali
Thomas, Ravi
author_facet Parikh, Rajul
Sachdeva, Virender
Kekunnaya, Ramesh
Rao, B Venkateshwar
Parikh, Shefali
Thomas, Ravi
author_sort Parikh, Rajul
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in eyes with amblyopia compared with contralateral healthy eyes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included patients with anisometropic amblyopia, strabismic amblyopia, and mixed amblyopia. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmic examination, including RNFLT measurement with time-domain OCT (Stratus OCT) and scanning laser polarimeter (GDX VCC). A paired “t” test was used to compare average and quadrant-wise RNFL thickness between the amblyopic and contralateral normal eyes. In addition, an analysis of variance test was used to compare various RNFL thickness parameters between the three groups. RESULTS: A total of 33 eyes of 33 subjects with anisometropic amblyopia, 20 eyes of 20 subjects with strabismic amblyopia, and 38 eyes of 38 subjects with mixed amblyopia were included. In the anisometropic amblyopia group, the average RNFLT in the amblyopic eye was 98.2 mm and 99.8 mm in the fellow normal eye (P = 0.5), the total foveal thickness was 152.82 mm (26.78) in the anisometropic eye and 150.42 mm (23.84) in the fellow eye (P = 0.38). The difference between amblyopic and contralateral normal eye for RNFL and macular parameters was statistically insignificant in all three groups. The RNFL thickness in four quadrants was similar in the amblyopic and non-amblyopic eye between all three groups and statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that RNFL thickness was similar in amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes between all three amblyopia groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9672721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96727212022-11-19 Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia Parikh, Rajul Sachdeva, Virender Kekunnaya, Ramesh Rao, B Venkateshwar Parikh, Shefali Thomas, Ravi Indian J Ophthalmol Special Focus, Pediatric Ophthalmology, Original Article PURPOSE: To report retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in eyes with amblyopia compared with contralateral healthy eyes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included patients with anisometropic amblyopia, strabismic amblyopia, and mixed amblyopia. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmic examination, including RNFLT measurement with time-domain OCT (Stratus OCT) and scanning laser polarimeter (GDX VCC). A paired “t” test was used to compare average and quadrant-wise RNFL thickness between the amblyopic and contralateral normal eyes. In addition, an analysis of variance test was used to compare various RNFL thickness parameters between the three groups. RESULTS: A total of 33 eyes of 33 subjects with anisometropic amblyopia, 20 eyes of 20 subjects with strabismic amblyopia, and 38 eyes of 38 subjects with mixed amblyopia were included. In the anisometropic amblyopia group, the average RNFLT in the amblyopic eye was 98.2 mm and 99.8 mm in the fellow normal eye (P = 0.5), the total foveal thickness was 152.82 mm (26.78) in the anisometropic eye and 150.42 mm (23.84) in the fellow eye (P = 0.38). The difference between amblyopic and contralateral normal eye for RNFL and macular parameters was statistically insignificant in all three groups. The RNFL thickness in four quadrants was similar in the amblyopic and non-amblyopic eye between all three groups and statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that RNFL thickness was similar in amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes between all three amblyopia groups. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-08 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9672721/ /pubmed/35918974 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2875_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Special Focus, Pediatric Ophthalmology, Original Article
Parikh, Rajul
Sachdeva, Virender
Kekunnaya, Ramesh
Rao, B Venkateshwar
Parikh, Shefali
Thomas, Ravi
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia
title Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia
title_full Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia
title_fullStr Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia
title_full_unstemmed Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia
title_short Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia
title_sort retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia
topic Special Focus, Pediatric Ophthalmology, Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918974
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2875_21
work_keys_str_mv AT parikhrajul retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessinamblyopia
AT sachdevavirender retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessinamblyopia
AT kekunnayaramesh retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessinamblyopia
AT raobvenkateshwar retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessinamblyopia
AT parikhshefali retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessinamblyopia
AT thomasravi retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessinamblyopia