Cargando…
Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review
BACKGROUND: Cognitive remediation (CR) therapy provides an effective way to improve cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. With the advent of telehealth services, especially during COVID 19 pandemic, a suitable alternative can be found in computer and cell phone-based mental health interventions. P...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41983-022-00574-7 |
_version_ | 1784832896869072896 |
---|---|
author | Datta, Reetobaan Vishwanath, Rashmi Shenoy, Sonia |
author_facet | Datta, Reetobaan Vishwanath, Rashmi Shenoy, Sonia |
author_sort | Datta, Reetobaan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cognitive remediation (CR) therapy provides an effective way to improve cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. With the advent of telehealth services, especially during COVID 19 pandemic, a suitable alternative can be found in computer and cell phone-based mental health interventions. Previous studies have proven that remote mental health interventions have by and large been successful. Remote psychotherapy/CR services can now be accessed through smartphone apps, iPads, laptops and wearable devices. This has the advantage of reaching a wider population in resource-limited settings. The lack of access to technology, difficulty in using these online interventions and lack of privacy provide impediments to the delivery of care through these online platforms. Further, as some previous studies have shown, there may be a high rate of dropout in people using remote mental health resources. We aim to look at the factors, which influence the accessibility of remote mental health interventions in schizophrenia. Additionally, we test the feasibility of these interventions and look at how they compare and the potential they hold for implementation in future clinical settings. RESULTS: We found remote cognitive remediation to be both accessible and feasible. Concerning features, however, are the high attrition rates and the concentration of the studies in Western populations. CONCLUSIONS: Remote interventions are a viable alternative to in-person psychotherapy when in-person resources may not always be present. They are efficacious in improving health outcomes among patients with schizophrenia. Further research into the widespread implementation of remote CR will be beneficial in informing clinical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9673189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96731892022-11-18 Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review Datta, Reetobaan Vishwanath, Rashmi Shenoy, Sonia Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg Review BACKGROUND: Cognitive remediation (CR) therapy provides an effective way to improve cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. With the advent of telehealth services, especially during COVID 19 pandemic, a suitable alternative can be found in computer and cell phone-based mental health interventions. Previous studies have proven that remote mental health interventions have by and large been successful. Remote psychotherapy/CR services can now be accessed through smartphone apps, iPads, laptops and wearable devices. This has the advantage of reaching a wider population in resource-limited settings. The lack of access to technology, difficulty in using these online interventions and lack of privacy provide impediments to the delivery of care through these online platforms. Further, as some previous studies have shown, there may be a high rate of dropout in people using remote mental health resources. We aim to look at the factors, which influence the accessibility of remote mental health interventions in schizophrenia. Additionally, we test the feasibility of these interventions and look at how they compare and the potential they hold for implementation in future clinical settings. RESULTS: We found remote cognitive remediation to be both accessible and feasible. Concerning features, however, are the high attrition rates and the concentration of the studies in Western populations. CONCLUSIONS: Remote interventions are a viable alternative to in-person psychotherapy when in-person resources may not always be present. They are efficacious in improving health outcomes among patients with schizophrenia. Further research into the widespread implementation of remote CR will be beneficial in informing clinical decision-making. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9673189/ /pubmed/36415756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41983-022-00574-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Datta, Reetobaan Vishwanath, Rashmi Shenoy, Sonia Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review |
title | Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review |
title_full | Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review |
title_fullStr | Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review |
title_short | Are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? A narrative review |
title_sort | are remote psychotherapy/remediation efforts accessible and feasible in patients with schizophrenia? a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41983-022-00574-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dattareetobaan areremotepsychotherapyremediationeffortsaccessibleandfeasibleinpatientswithschizophreniaanarrativereview AT vishwanathrashmi areremotepsychotherapyremediationeffortsaccessibleandfeasibleinpatientswithschizophreniaanarrativereview AT shenoysonia areremotepsychotherapyremediationeffortsaccessibleandfeasibleinpatientswithschizophreniaanarrativereview |