Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: In recent years, programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors, including sintilimab, have significantly prolonged the overall survival time of patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab is unclear. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ting, Wang, Xintian, Cao, Yingdan, Yang, Lan, Wang, Zijing, Ma, Aixia, Li, Hongchao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08661-4
_version_ 1784832913711300608
author Zhou, Ting
Wang, Xintian
Cao, Yingdan
Yang, Lan
Wang, Zijing
Ma, Aixia
Li, Hongchao
author_facet Zhou, Ting
Wang, Xintian
Cao, Yingdan
Yang, Lan
Wang, Zijing
Ma, Aixia
Li, Hongchao
author_sort Zhou, Ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors, including sintilimab, have significantly prolonged the overall survival time of patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC. METHODS: A lifetime partitioned survival model was developed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar vs. lenvatinib for advanced HCC from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. The clinical and safety data were derived from two recent randomized clinical trials, the ORIENT-32 and REFLECT studies. Utility data were obtained from previous studies. Long-term direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were predicted. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the robustness of the model. RESULTS: Compared with lenvatinib, combination therapy with sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar yielded an additional 0.493 QALYs at a higher cost ($33,102 vs. $21,037) (2021 US dollars). This resulted in a deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $24,462 per QALY in the base-case analysis. The ICERs were sensitive to the utility of post-progression and the cost of bevacizumab biosimilar. A lower ICER was estimated when the dose of bevacizumab biosimilar decreased from 15 mg to 7.5 mg per kilogram in the scenario analysis. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of being cost-effective for sintilimab treatment at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of one ($12,516) and three times the gross domestic product per capita in China ($37,547) were 11.6% and 88.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option as a first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic HCC in China when WTP threshold is over $23,650. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08661-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9673291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96732912022-11-19 Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma Zhou, Ting Wang, Xintian Cao, Yingdan Yang, Lan Wang, Zijing Ma, Aixia Li, Hongchao BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: In recent years, programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors, including sintilimab, have significantly prolonged the overall survival time of patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC. METHODS: A lifetime partitioned survival model was developed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar vs. lenvatinib for advanced HCC from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. The clinical and safety data were derived from two recent randomized clinical trials, the ORIENT-32 and REFLECT studies. Utility data were obtained from previous studies. Long-term direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were predicted. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the robustness of the model. RESULTS: Compared with lenvatinib, combination therapy with sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar yielded an additional 0.493 QALYs at a higher cost ($33,102 vs. $21,037) (2021 US dollars). This resulted in a deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $24,462 per QALY in the base-case analysis. The ICERs were sensitive to the utility of post-progression and the cost of bevacizumab biosimilar. A lower ICER was estimated when the dose of bevacizumab biosimilar decreased from 15 mg to 7.5 mg per kilogram in the scenario analysis. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of being cost-effective for sintilimab treatment at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of one ($12,516) and three times the gross domestic product per capita in China ($37,547) were 11.6% and 88.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option as a first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic HCC in China when WTP threshold is over $23,650. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08661-4. BioMed Central 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9673291/ /pubmed/36397064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08661-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhou, Ting
Wang, Xintian
Cao, Yingdan
Yang, Lan
Wang, Zijing
Ma, Aixia
Li, Hongchao
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08661-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouting costeffectivenessanalysisofsintilimabplusbevacizumabbiosimilarcomparedwithlenvatinibasthefirstlinetreatmentofunresectableormetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wangxintian costeffectivenessanalysisofsintilimabplusbevacizumabbiosimilarcomparedwithlenvatinibasthefirstlinetreatmentofunresectableormetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT caoyingdan costeffectivenessanalysisofsintilimabplusbevacizumabbiosimilarcomparedwithlenvatinibasthefirstlinetreatmentofunresectableormetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yanglan costeffectivenessanalysisofsintilimabplusbevacizumabbiosimilarcomparedwithlenvatinibasthefirstlinetreatmentofunresectableormetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wangzijing costeffectivenessanalysisofsintilimabplusbevacizumabbiosimilarcomparedwithlenvatinibasthefirstlinetreatmentofunresectableormetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT maaixia costeffectivenessanalysisofsintilimabplusbevacizumabbiosimilarcomparedwithlenvatinibasthefirstlinetreatmentofunresectableormetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lihongchao costeffectivenessanalysisofsintilimabplusbevacizumabbiosimilarcomparedwithlenvatinibasthefirstlinetreatmentofunresectableormetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma