Cargando…

Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment

CATEGORY: Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: While transfer of the tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) to the lateral cuneiform (LC) following serial casting has been used for over 60 years to treat relapsed clubfoot deformity, modern methods of tendon fixation remain largely unstudied. Though interference scre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Zachary, Polk, Jordan L., Zide, Jacob R., Kanaan, Yassine, Riccio, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673512/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00805
_version_ 1784832955903901696
author Meyer, Zachary
Polk, Jordan L.
Zide, Jacob R.
Kanaan, Yassine
Riccio, Anthony
author_facet Meyer, Zachary
Polk, Jordan L.
Zide, Jacob R.
Kanaan, Yassine
Riccio, Anthony
author_sort Meyer, Zachary
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: While transfer of the tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) to the lateral cuneiform (LC) following serial casting has been used for over 60 years to treat relapsed clubfoot deformity, modern methods of tendon fixation remain largely unstudied. Though interference screw fixation has the potential of obviate concerns of pressure necrosis and proper tendon tensioning associated with plantar button suspensory stabilization, a better understanding of LC morphology in young children is a necessary first step in assessing the viability of this fixation technique. The purpose of this investigation is therefore to define LC morphology in children aged 3-6 years. METHODS: A retrospective radiographic review of 40 healthy pediatric feet aged 3-6 years who had either MRI or CT scans was performed at a single pediatric hospital. The length, width, and height of only the ossified portion of the LC were measured digitally using sagittal, coronal, and axial imaging. In addition, the maximal cross-sectional diameter of the TAT was measured at the level of the tibiotalar joint. RESULTS: Average ossified LC width ranged from 8.5mm in the 3-year-old cohort to 10.3mm in 6-year-old children. While the average width increased with each year of age, ANOVA testing revealed no statistically significant difference in width between age groups (p=0.091). Average ossified LC length ranged from 13.5mm in the 3-year-old cohort to 18.3mm in 6-year-old children with statistically significant increases in all age groups separated by two or more years (p=0.017). the TAT to ossified LC width ratio ranged from 44% to 53% across age groups. (table 1). CONCLUSION: The dimensions of the LC ossification center are large enough to allow interference screw fixation in children 3 to 6 years of age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9673512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96735122022-11-19 Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment Meyer, Zachary Polk, Jordan L. Zide, Jacob R. Kanaan, Yassine Riccio, Anthony Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: While transfer of the tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) to the lateral cuneiform (LC) following serial casting has been used for over 60 years to treat relapsed clubfoot deformity, modern methods of tendon fixation remain largely unstudied. Though interference screw fixation has the potential of obviate concerns of pressure necrosis and proper tendon tensioning associated with plantar button suspensory stabilization, a better understanding of LC morphology in young children is a necessary first step in assessing the viability of this fixation technique. The purpose of this investigation is therefore to define LC morphology in children aged 3-6 years. METHODS: A retrospective radiographic review of 40 healthy pediatric feet aged 3-6 years who had either MRI or CT scans was performed at a single pediatric hospital. The length, width, and height of only the ossified portion of the LC were measured digitally using sagittal, coronal, and axial imaging. In addition, the maximal cross-sectional diameter of the TAT was measured at the level of the tibiotalar joint. RESULTS: Average ossified LC width ranged from 8.5mm in the 3-year-old cohort to 10.3mm in 6-year-old children. While the average width increased with each year of age, ANOVA testing revealed no statistically significant difference in width between age groups (p=0.091). Average ossified LC length ranged from 13.5mm in the 3-year-old cohort to 18.3mm in 6-year-old children with statistically significant increases in all age groups separated by two or more years (p=0.017). the TAT to ossified LC width ratio ranged from 44% to 53% across age groups. (table 1). CONCLUSION: The dimensions of the LC ossification center are large enough to allow interference screw fixation in children 3 to 6 years of age. SAGE Publications 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9673512/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00805 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Meyer, Zachary
Polk, Jordan L.
Zide, Jacob R.
Kanaan, Yassine
Riccio, Anthony
Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment
title Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment
title_full Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment
title_fullStr Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment
title_short Interference Screw vs Suture Button Fixation for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer to Lateral Cuneiform: A Biomechanical Analysis with Implications for Clubfoot Treatment
title_sort interference screw vs suture button fixation for tibialis anterior tendon transfer to lateral cuneiform: a biomechanical analysis with implications for clubfoot treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673512/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00805
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerzachary interferencescrewvssuturebuttonfixationfortibialisanteriortendontransfertolateralcuneiformabiomechanicalanalysiswithimplicationsforclubfoottreatment
AT polkjordanl interferencescrewvssuturebuttonfixationfortibialisanteriortendontransfertolateralcuneiformabiomechanicalanalysiswithimplicationsforclubfoottreatment
AT zidejacobr interferencescrewvssuturebuttonfixationfortibialisanteriortendontransfertolateralcuneiformabiomechanicalanalysiswithimplicationsforclubfoottreatment
AT kanaanyassine interferencescrewvssuturebuttonfixationfortibialisanteriortendontransfertolateralcuneiformabiomechanicalanalysiswithimplicationsforclubfoottreatment
AT riccioanthony interferencescrewvssuturebuttonfixationfortibialisanteriortendontransfertolateralcuneiformabiomechanicalanalysiswithimplicationsforclubfoottreatment