Cargando…
The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication from general anesthesia that impacts on postoperative recovery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prophylactic rewarming following general anesthesia, so as to decrease the incidence of PONV among patients undergoing laparoscopic hys...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0059.R2.06072020 |
_version_ | 1784833038860943360 |
---|---|
author | Liang, DongDong Shan, YuanLu Wang, Leilei |
author_facet | Liang, DongDong Shan, YuanLu Wang, Leilei |
author_sort | Liang, DongDong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication from general anesthesia that impacts on postoperative recovery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prophylactic rewarming following general anesthesia, so as to decrease the incidence of PONV among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized clinical study at a hospital in China. METHODS: Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned into two groups. The forced air warming (FAW) group received pre-warmed Ringer's solution with FAW until the end of surgery. The control group received Ringer's solution without FAW. The pre-warmed Ringer's solution was stored in a cabinet set at 40 °C. The FAW tube was placed beside the patient's shoulder with a temperature of 43 °C. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed the study. The FAW group showed significant differences versus the controls regarding temperature. At 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, the incidences of PONV were 53.3%, 6.7% and 3.3% in the FAW group versus 63.3%, 30% and 3.3% in the controls. VAS scores were significantly lower in the FAW group than in the controls at 24 hours (P= 0.035). Forty-item questionnaire total scores in the FAW group were significantly higher than in the controls. The physical independence and pain scores at 24 hours and emotional support and pain scores at 48 hours in the FAW group were higher than in the controls (P < 0.05). There was no difference in hemodynamics or demographics between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic rewarming relieved PONV and improved the quality of postoperative recovery. CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER (CHICTR): ChiCTR-IOR-17012901. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9673860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96738602022-11-21 The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study Liang, DongDong Shan, YuanLu Wang, Leilei Sao Paulo Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication from general anesthesia that impacts on postoperative recovery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prophylactic rewarming following general anesthesia, so as to decrease the incidence of PONV among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized clinical study at a hospital in China. METHODS: Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned into two groups. The forced air warming (FAW) group received pre-warmed Ringer's solution with FAW until the end of surgery. The control group received Ringer's solution without FAW. The pre-warmed Ringer's solution was stored in a cabinet set at 40 °C. The FAW tube was placed beside the patient's shoulder with a temperature of 43 °C. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed the study. The FAW group showed significant differences versus the controls regarding temperature. At 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, the incidences of PONV were 53.3%, 6.7% and 3.3% in the FAW group versus 63.3%, 30% and 3.3% in the controls. VAS scores were significantly lower in the FAW group than in the controls at 24 hours (P= 0.035). Forty-item questionnaire total scores in the FAW group were significantly higher than in the controls. The physical independence and pain scores at 24 hours and emotional support and pain scores at 48 hours in the FAW group were higher than in the controls (P < 0.05). There was no difference in hemodynamics or demographics between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic rewarming relieved PONV and improved the quality of postoperative recovery. CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER (CHICTR): ChiCTR-IOR-17012901. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9673860/ /pubmed/33053048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0059.R2.06072020 Text en © 2022 by Associação Paulista de Medicina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Liang, DongDong Shan, YuanLu Wang, Leilei The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study |
title | The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study |
title_full | The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study |
title_fullStr | The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study |
title_short | The effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study |
title_sort | effect of prophylactic rewarming on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0059.R2.06072020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangdongdong theeffectofprophylacticrewarmingonpostoperativenauseaandvomitingamongpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy AT shanyuanlu theeffectofprophylacticrewarmingonpostoperativenauseaandvomitingamongpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy AT wangleilei theeffectofprophylacticrewarmingonpostoperativenauseaandvomitingamongpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy AT liangdongdong effectofprophylacticrewarmingonpostoperativenauseaandvomitingamongpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy AT shanyuanlu effectofprophylacticrewarmingonpostoperativenauseaandvomitingamongpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy AT wangleilei effectofprophylacticrewarmingonpostoperativenauseaandvomitingamongpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy |